Alexandre Fedorovski
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2017
- 2,536
- 1,161
- 210
Cryptoneosionist media continue anti-Russian hysteria over interference in US elections. Recently, the US prosecutor's office brought charges against 13 legal and 3 individuals from Russia. And then, like a bolt from the clear sky, interviews with former agents and the CIA leadership appeared, which confirm that the US HAS INTERVENED AND CONTINUES TO INTERVENE IN ELECTIONS IN OTHER COUNTRIES.
James Woolsey, former CIA Director, in particular, giving an interview to Fox News, admitted that America meddled in foreign elections in the past and interferes now making a reservation that it is done "for a very good cause"
(Former CIA Director and Fox News Host Share a Laugh Over American Interference in Foreign Elections).
As we understand, a "good cause" is understood as a goal to ensure the most favored nation treatment in a "target country". You do not need to be a current or former director of the CIA or director of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service to get to know that the practice of direct or indirect intervention in elections of other countries is a routine of international relations.
It is difficult to say how much money is spent for these purposes, since each special service has its own budget, but it is known that in 2018 Washington planned to send only $ 4.6 billion to implement the initiative to contain Russia in Europe.
These funds would be enough to significantly reduce poverty in the United States.
But that's not the point. IF the US political elite recognizes the right to interfere in the internal politics of other countries, why can we not (hypothetically) recognize the right of these countries to do likewise?!
Or are we once again confronted with the cryptoneozionist concept of "exclusivity" and "superiority" of Americans over others ???
James Woolsey, former CIA Director, in particular, giving an interview to Fox News, admitted that America meddled in foreign elections in the past and interferes now making a reservation that it is done "for a very good cause"
(Former CIA Director and Fox News Host Share a Laugh Over American Interference in Foreign Elections).
As we understand, a "good cause" is understood as a goal to ensure the most favored nation treatment in a "target country". You do not need to be a current or former director of the CIA or director of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service to get to know that the practice of direct or indirect intervention in elections of other countries is a routine of international relations.
It is difficult to say how much money is spent for these purposes, since each special service has its own budget, but it is known that in 2018 Washington planned to send only $ 4.6 billion to implement the initiative to contain Russia in Europe.
These funds would be enough to significantly reduce poverty in the United States.
But that's not the point. IF the US political elite recognizes the right to interfere in the internal politics of other countries, why can we not (hypothetically) recognize the right of these countries to do likewise?!
Or are we once again confronted with the cryptoneozionist concept of "exclusivity" and "superiority" of Americans over others ???
Last edited:
