Questioning The Definition of 'Religion'

nope------you heard me screech "Nazi"? I describe---usually in writing-----persons who adhere to Nazi principles like "restricted towns" as Nazis. or segregationists as
"Nazis" "COMMUNIST" was used as if it was a filthy INSULT ------like "n#%%@r" in my childhood town which was almost still all restricted when I got there----aged five. The name of the town was WASP-VILLE-----the
village cuisine was WHITE BREAD AND HOSTESS CUPCAKES and the village sport
was filling birds with buckshot

Since there are no "Nazi" towns in America, we can conclude that you calling the one you grew up in this is just hyperbole. You were clearly filled with hate and lashed out against the object of your hate by attributing to them the worst attribute you could. As a Jew, that was to be a Nazi. In truth I doubt there were any who harbored any sympathy toward Hitler or his Reich.

well---you are wrong------historically---the area of the world in which I was a child is known for its Nazi enclaves and FAMOUS historical Nazis. I had no idea as a child. The extensive body of Nazi propaganda which I read as a child----was stuff fluttering around town-----old seedy pamphlets. It is true that I knew I was a jew------the stuff interested me because it was ALL ABOUT JEWS. I read the koran as a teen too------also ---ALL ABOUT JEWS (I never attended any programs for the education of jewish children
so that my sunday school education was unmarred by preconceived notions)
 
sure I know----lots of jerks like to ELEVATE sociology and economics to a PURE SCIENCE------like Physics----it makes them feel a little smarter. Most Psychology majors -------are psych majors because they could not get thru CALCULUS

What does sociology have to do with economics?

Calculus is a prerequisite for applied statistics. Applied statistics is a prerequisite for economics.

Again, you have no clue what you are babbling about.

not true ECONOMICS 101 ---at least in my undergrad school had NO PRE-REQUISITES at all. I did not take that course. Yes---advanced stats---includes formulas requiring knowledge of calculus. I hated stats---but had to do a little anyway
 
PS----your statement "what does sociology have to do with economics" is really hilarious.
Ask BRONISLAW MALINOWSKI
 
not true ECONOMICS 101 ---at least in my undergrad school had NO PRE-REQUISITES at all. I did not take that course. Yes---advanced stats---includes formulas requiring knowledge of calculus. I hated stats---but had to do a little anyway

Without linear regression, ANOVA, non-parametric analysis, Chi-Squared, etc. it is impossible to calculate the formulas behind economics. Economics is all about advanced mathematics. Simply tracking inflation curves is dependent on trend analysis.

You could not survive anything beyond a survey course of economics without a solid grasp of calculus.


Many economists have mathematics degrees. Mine is an MBA with a concentration in economics. I will get my Ph.D. in August, in SPCM.
 
not true ECONOMICS 101 ---at least in my undergrad school had NO PRE-REQUISITES at all. I did not take that course. Yes---advanced stats---includes formulas requiring knowledge of calculus. I hated stats---but had to do a little anyway

Without linear regression, ANOVA, non-parametric analysis, Chi-Squared, etc. it is impossible to calculate the formulas behind economics. Economics is all about advanced mathematics. Simply tracking inflation curves is dependent on trend analysis.

You could not survive anything beyond a survey course of economics without a solid grasp of calculus.


Many economists have mathematics degrees. Mine is an MBA with a concentration in economics. I will get my Ph.D. in August, in SPCM.

not impressed----anyone who believes that one has to know calculus in order to calculate chi squared is in need of returning to the 101 level------sorry baby-----I ACED calculus----the only one in my class of over 50 ---(started out as two classes and ended with seven students---freshman calculus----so many became either psych majors of POLY SCI after that knock'em dead course
 
PS----your statement "what does sociology have to do with economics" is really hilarious.
Ask BRONISLAW MALINOWSKI


The anthropologist? I mean, he's dead, but were he not, why would I ask him such a thing?

There is a branch of economics associated with psychology called "behavioral economics" that attempts to explain consumer patterns and trends.

BTW, the liberal arts are history, linguistics, art, music, and philosophy. (cultural studies, women's/black studies, underwater basket weaving, and studying the migration patterns of Peruvian sea slugs.)

Sociology is a science.
 
PS----your statement "what does sociology have to do with economics" is really hilarious.
Ask BRONISLAW MALINOWSKI


The anthropologist? I mean, he's dead, but were he not, why would I ask him such a thing?

There is a branch of economics associated with psychology called "behavioral economics" that attempts to explain consumer patterns and trends.

BTW, the liberal arts are history, linguistics, art, music, and philosophy. (cultural studies, women's/black studies, underwater basket weaving, and studying the migration patterns of Peruvian sea slugs.)

Sociology is a science.

ROFLMAO yeah-----COMING OF AGE IN SAMOA -----is ROCKET SCIENCE. Intro to psych 101----requires a deep understanding of
astro physics
 
not impressed----anyone who believes that one has to know calculus in order to calculate chi squared is in need of returning to the 101 level------sorry baby-----I ACED calculus----the only one in my class of over 50 ---(started out as two classes and ended with seven students---freshman calculus----so many became either psych majors of POLY SCI after that knock'em dead course

LOL;

pure bullshit.

http://basics.sjtu.edu.cn/~yuxi/papers/ic.pdf
 
she actually spoke at one of the graduations in my college-----uhm---not mine----she was old---kind frail

BRONISLAW MALINOWSKI? :eek:

220px-Bronislawmalinowski.jpg


How very exciting for you... :eusa_whistle:
 
RC's believe in being socialists. That should be obvious. If only more would practice what they preach.

Jesus was a socialist in the Pharisee mode.
The people who live in catholic monasteries--
priests and nuns----and whatever else ends up
there live SOCIALIST lives albeit with a very
AUTHORITATIVE hierarchy but I have never
heard of "socialism" as a dogma of the catholic church

We believe in giving and charity. Although some live as monks or nuns and do not hurt anyone, seems to me
like a waste. I am not referring to a government, but the RCC teaching.

Canon law was compiled as THE LAW of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE and includes issues of economy and social structure. It was not based on socialism-----it was a theocratic government with a capitalistic
economy

You right there was social structure, and like every social structure, all are not equal. The US is based on Roman law before the legalization of Christianity, freedom of religion, but all roads do lead to Rome. The NT taught us well, give to Caesar what is his, obey your rulers. Since I'm not wealthy, I will give to others less fortunate or in need, those Republicans hate freedom, at one time the Democrats did, now just the opposite. Like a wheel, keeps on spinning. I got off long ago.

Nether the USA legal or social structure is based on the either the ancient ROMAN SYSTEM or the system of the "holy" roman empire------you got that silly idea from your catechism whore who also told you that the system of justice including the INQUISITION of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE was sublime
justice for all

All roads lead to Rome like it or not. Blame it all on Kamza and bar Kamza. Rome Is not to blame.
 
Jesus was a socialist in the Pharisee mode.
The people who live in catholic monasteries--
priests and nuns----and whatever else ends up
there live SOCIALIST lives albeit with a very
AUTHORITATIVE hierarchy but I have never
heard of "socialism" as a dogma of the catholic church

We believe in giving and charity. Although some live as monks or nuns and do not hurt anyone, seems to me
like a waste. I am not referring to a government, but the RCC teaching.

Canon law was compiled as THE LAW of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE and includes issues of economy and social structure. It was not based on socialism-----it was a theocratic government with a capitalistic
economy

You right there was social structure, and like every social structure, all are not equal. The US is based on Roman law before the legalization of Christianity, freedom of religion, but all roads do lead to Rome. The NT taught us well, give to Caesar what is his, obey your rulers. Since I'm not wealthy, I will give to others less fortunate or in need, those Republicans hate freedom, at one time the Democrats did, now just the opposite. Like a wheel, keeps on spinning. I got off long ago.

Nether the USA legal or social structure is based on the either the ancient ROMAN SYSTEM or the system of the "holy" roman empire------you got that silly idea from your catechism whore who also told you that the system of justice including the INQUISITION of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE was sublime
justice for all

All roads lead to Rome like it or not. Blame it all on Kamza and bar Kamza. Rome Is not to blame.

who is "kamza" according to your catechism whore?
 
Jesus was a socialist in the Pharisee mode.
The people who live in catholic monasteries--
priests and nuns----and whatever else ends up
there live SOCIALIST lives albeit with a very
AUTHORITATIVE hierarchy but I have never
heard of "socialism" as a dogma of the catholic church

We believe in giving and charity. Although some live as monks or nuns and do not hurt anyone, seems to me
like a waste. I am not referring to a government, but the RCC teaching.

Canon law was compiled as THE LAW of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE and includes issues of economy and social structure. It was not based on socialism-----it was a theocratic government with a capitalistic
economy

You right there was social structure, and like every social structure, all are not equal. The US is based on Roman law before the legalization of Christianity, freedom of religion, but all roads do lead to Rome. The NT taught us well, give to Caesar what is his, obey your rulers. Since I'm not wealthy, I will give to others less fortunate or in need, those Republicans hate freedom, at one time the Democrats did, now just the opposite. Like a wheel, keeps on spinning. I got off long ago.

Nether the USA legal or social structure is based on the either the ancient ROMAN SYSTEM or the system of the "holy" roman empire------you got that silly idea from your catechism whore who also told you that the system of justice including the INQUISITION of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE was sublime
justice for all

All roads lead to Rome like it or not. Blame it all on Kamza and bar Kamza. Rome Is not to blame.

Hickory Dickory Dock---the mouse ran up the clock
 
We believe in giving and charity. Although some live as monks or nuns and do not hurt anyone, seems to me
like a waste. I am not referring to a government, but the RCC teaching.

Canon law was compiled as THE LAW of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE and includes issues of economy and social structure. It was not based on socialism-----it was a theocratic government with a capitalistic
economy

You right there was social structure, and like every social structure, all are not equal. The US is based on Roman law before the legalization of Christianity, freedom of religion, but all roads do lead to Rome. The NT taught us well, give to Caesar what is his, obey your rulers. Since I'm not wealthy, I will give to others less fortunate or in need, those Republicans hate freedom, at one time the Democrats did, now just the opposite. Like a wheel, keeps on spinning. I got off long ago.

Nether the USA legal or social structure is based on the either the ancient ROMAN SYSTEM or the system of the "holy" roman empire------you got that silly idea from your catechism whore who also told you that the system of justice including the INQUISITION of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE was sublime
justice for all

All roads lead to Rome like it or not. Blame it all on Kamza and bar Kamza. Rome Is not to blame.

Hickory Dickory Dock---the mouse ran up the clock


The story of Kamsa and Bar Kamsa (or Kamtza and Bar Kamtza) (Hebrew: קמצא ובר קמצא‎‎) is the most famous midrash (Jewish legend) regarding the Destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in the 1st century CE.[1] The story appears in the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Gittin, folio 55b, and in the Midrash, Lamentations Rabbah 4:3.

Kamsa and Bar Kamsa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Canon law was compiled as THE LAW of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE and includes issues of economy and social structure. It was not based on socialism-----it was a theocratic government with a capitalistic
economy

You right there was social structure, and like every social structure, all are not equal. The US is based on Roman law before the legalization of Christianity, freedom of religion, but all roads do lead to Rome. The NT taught us well, give to Caesar what is his, obey your rulers. Since I'm not wealthy, I will give to others less fortunate or in need, those Republicans hate freedom, at one time the Democrats did, now just the opposite. Like a wheel, keeps on spinning. I got off long ago.

Nether the USA legal or social structure is based on the either the ancient ROMAN SYSTEM or the system of the "holy" roman empire------you got that silly idea from your catechism whore who also told you that the system of justice including the INQUISITION of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE was sublime
justice for all

All roads lead to Rome like it or not. Blame it all on Kamza and bar Kamza. Rome Is not to blame.

Hickory Dickory Dock---the mouse ran up the clock


The story of Kamsa and Bar Kamsa (or Kamtza and Bar Kamtza) (Hebrew: קמצא ובר קמצא‎‎) is the most famous midrash (Jewish legend) regarding the Destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in the 1st century CE.[1] The story appears in the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Gittin, folio 55b, and in the Midrash, Lamentations Rabbah 4:3.

Kamsa and Bar Kamsa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

the "story" is not history------if it is written anywhere ----which it probably is not------it is CERTAINLY NOT IN GITTEN------for some reason ----mysterious to me-----islamo Nazi dogs and sluts ALWAYS claim they are quoting from "GITTEN"------I am an expert in Gitten------your citation is a piece of shit
(as usual)
 
When Mohammad created Islam, his purpose was to invest in himself a sense of ultimate power so his warriors would not question him as he instructed them to rape, murder and pillage their way to dominance. The religious aspects were simply grafted onto his political agenda as he cobbled together various bits from other religions to give the appearance of religion, but retaining the aggressive agenda.

Precious little has changed in 1400 years, as aggression is still the purpose, and religion is simply the ruse used to attain the ends.
Wrooong.The jew-ish people made islam.See this is why the caucasians are not to teach our history.Simply You Don`t Know,At All,no Inkling of a lil hint.you people are amazing.:bsflag:
 

Forum List

Back
Top