Question for you all

Gop guy

Member
Apr 17, 2004
927
3
16
West Reading PA
This really only applies to those of us who are 18 or older, but I guess you young bucks can just vote for who you like better. 18 and older, please tell me if that applies to you when you post.

The question: Who are you voting for in November?

I can't believe no one else has asked this before lol.

Oh and of course I'm voting for our honorable President Bush!

Thanks and God bless.
 
Been asked many times already, in poll format, but I guess it won't hurt to do it again!

I'm slightly over 18 :D

I'll be voting for George Bush.
 
My choice:

http://www.peroutka2004.com/
Michael Anthony Peroutka, a graduate of Loyola college in Maryland and the University of Baltimore School of Law, is Chairman of the Constitution Party of Maryland and a member of the Executive Committee of the Constitution Party National Committee. Michael and his wife, Diane, live in Millersville, Maryland with their three children, Timothy, Patrick, and Elizabeth.

Founder of the Institute on the Constitution, a nation-wide program teaching the principles incorporated in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, Michael has, for 18 years been a partner with his brother, Stephen, in the Pasadena, Maryland law firm of Peroutka & Peroutka.

Inspired by his parents, Anthony and Elizabeth Peroutka, Michael was called to public service at an early age, providing leadership in support of the right to life, the right to keep and bear arms, and other Constitutional causes. Michael resigned from a position with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services when he recognized that none of the programs on which he was working were constitutionally permissible.

Michael aslo serves on the Board of Trustees of The Conservative Caucus Research, Analysis & Education Foundation.
 
Being here in Texas leaves me in a rotten ass predicament. You would think that its a purely owned Bush state but the group of Independent Texans has now erupted into a 'quagmire', for lack of a better term at this point, and is currently in crisis of disbanding because half the members may outright quit if they decide to support nader. Apparently the disdain for Bush is so intense that they will abandon their independent thinking and vote kerry with the mindset of 'anybody but bush'. Talk about a blow to the democratic process. On top of that, we independents have to deal with both Bush and Kerry hemming and delaying the political questionnaire we sent for positions on various issues along with the democrats doing all they can to scuttle the progress of putting Nader on the texas ballot.

I weep for my countrys political system today
 
Originally posted by NewGuy
My choice:

http://www.peroutka2004.com/

Nice site. The faq section doesn't even work. I suspect this party is just a red/white/blue front for a bunch of commies who've coopted god and the flag as part of their mind control. What convinces me most is newGuys's antiIntellectualism.
 
Originally posted by NewGuy
Really?

I guess you are still learning how to use a computer.

It works for me:
http://www.peroutka2004.com/schedule/index.php?action=eventview&event_id=116

"Do you support Civil Disobedience against the United States to gain your rights?

Absolutely not. Civil disobedience is an action that violates the Law to gain your own personal interests. However, any law passed that prohibits the free exercise of religion is no law, and ultimately violates the supreme Law of God. It is not civil disobedience to obey God, the source of all Law and Liberty."


So is this actually a yes, michael?
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
"Do you support Civil Disobedience against the United States to gain your rights?

Absolutely not. Civil disobedience is an action that violates the Law to gain your own personal interests. However, any law passed that prohibits the free exercise of religion is no law, and ultimately violates the supreme Law of God. It is not civil disobedience to obey God, the source of all Law and Liberty."


So is this actually a yes, michael?

He is discrediting the term "civil disobedience" as applied in the question. He also gives logical evidence to his line of thinking by regard to higher law and role of our rights in society.

I guess it got too complicated. I should have found a summary site with one liners.
 
Originally posted by NewGuy
He is discrediting the term "civil disobedience" as applied in the question. He also gives logical evidence to his line of thinking by regard to higher law and role of our rights in society.

I guess it got too complicated. I should have found a summary site with one liners.

Yes. But redefining words is not the clearest communication, Michael. HE. haha.

You should have just said yes. If you want to get elected, quit double talk.
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
I'm interested in catholic fascism just as much as I am in socialism.

If you are referring to Peroutka, he is not a catholic from anything I have seen.
 
Originally posted by NewGuy
If you are referring to Peroutka, he is not a catholic from anything I have seen.

I'm referring to you, Michael Peroutka. How does god feel about lies?
 
Originally posted by NewGuy
:laugh:
:cof:

Yep. You won't deny it. Because I do believe you believe in god, and you don't want to lie.


Instead of posting an emoticon, say it "I'm not Michael Peroutka."
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Yep. You won't deny it. Because I do believe you believe in god, and you don't want to lie.

I DO believe in God, and I DON'T lie. That was a common behavior trait of mine years ago, and I gave it up.

Instead of posting an emoticon, say it "I'm not Michael Peroutka."

:rolleyes:
 
Welcome to the board Michael. Hey are you an isolationist? Because isolationism and autarky are death to any nation. Hence, if you're an isolationist, you're anti-american.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top