Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Marc, are you saying Obama never campaigned or meant to be a uniter for the country?
Marc, are you saying Obama never campaigned or meant to be a uniter for the country?
I'm saying he never said it. Wheras Bush did. That was one of his main campaign messages.
Please present where Obama did this, as you RWers have been suggesting for the past 3 years or so now.
Thanks.
Is Herman Cain your definition of a uniter?
....Well?!??
Is Herman Cain your definition of a uniter?
....Well?!??
That would require you guys actually wanting to unite behind a President.
If you guys are the example, then you know exactly what you can expect.
I thought you people were all about leadership. Why don't you try LEADING by example for a change?
Is Herman Cain your definition of a uniter?
....Well?!??
LOL....you guys are TOO FUNNY.
All those snide remarks about Obama NOT being a uniter and all this criticism of him being a divider instead.
Seems like it was all HOGWASH, as you people aren't interested in uniters, unity or anything of the sort.
You're just interested in Right Wing Rule.
Isn't that it?
Just fess up and be blatant and upfront about it. You've already spilled the beans.
If you guys are the example, then you know exactly what you can expect.
I thought you people were all about leadership. Why don't you try LEADING by example for a change?
We are. We are leading people away from marxism and toward personal responsibility.
Red Herring.
Start a thread about Personal Responsibility and Marxism then.
This thread is about a leader that is a Uniter.
Unless of course, you are ready to admit that all that claptrap you and your ilk have been spewing for the last three years about unity was all BS.
So are you ready to do that now?
We could almost stop here, I'm right. I believe he IS being the President to ALL Americans. Are you trying to suggest that you will agree with EVERYTHING a President does, particular if they are of a differing ideology than you do? Let's get real here.You are right. He never claimed to be a uniter, but he did promise to be the president of ALL Americans.
I think it was a step in the right direction. A President not only has to deal and consider Americans, but other nations, their leaders and how America relates to them. You know, the bigger picture. Calling other nations and potential allies "axis of evil" and all sorts of disparaging adjectives isn't helping anyone. It was certainly no mistake it was a VERY wise and thoughtful and beneficial move. I'm very glad he did that, it helped a lot.How did you feel when Obama refused to let the administration use the word "terrorist" when discussing those from the Middle East who wished to harm Americans, then called the Republicans "terrorists" months later. Just a mistake on his part, or was there something deeper?
When did RWers become so touchy feely all of a sudden? I felt he was justified in what he said. The cop was stupid. Why are you so in support of the cop who was TOTALLY wrong for what he did, but not for the Professor who was totally WRONGED by the cop that was acting like a loose cannon? Can you agree that this is one of those issues that people are just going to have different OPINIONS about? And we all know what they say about opinions...right? Obama was right for defending his friend. Can you imagine what would have happened to a cop who arrested one of Bush's kronies irresponsibly? Please...How did you feel when the Cambridge professor was breaking into his own home because he didn't have a key and was approached by LE after a neighbor called in the suspicious acting man at the door appearing to break it in. Obama, who shouldn't have lowered himself to such a local incident, but got involvedf because the professor just happened to be a friend. Obama said that was a lesson for the stupidity of the cops! He did not have the facts of the entire situation yet made a racially based decision that was entirely wrong.
I think it's irrational, irresponsible or totally ignorant to expect that any politicial would be COMPLETELY unbiased. The thing you should be concerned about is are they being FAIR. Obama certainly is. Furthermore, he's not nearly as left as you RWers are claiming he is. Had he been us liberals would NOT have been so upset at him. He's actually been fairly right of center. Even RepubliCON$ attack him by calling him Bush II. What does that tell you? You should practice being fair and rational Jackson.He never claimed to be a uniter but has made controversial decisions that would make anyone think he is not leading with an unbiased hand. Next it was class warfare, and both you and other posters are painting all Democrats and all Republicans with broad brushes.
An Independent winning the Presidency is a pipe dream. Take the Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street movements as your ques. America is MASSIVELY divided, and no one wants to give in to the other. BTW, what "liberal strategies" has this Administration been using?It makes for a perfect opportunity for the Independent Voter to sway this election. They are the most objective portion of the population and perhaps dangerous to the liberal strategies that this administration is using.
Is this your admission to never being sincerely interested in unity then?We believe in freedom. Why on earth would we unite with someone who wants to rob us and control us? Seriously, we aren't stupid.
Ahhh...I see. Either YOUR RW way or no way eh? Some uniter you want.Is this your admission to never being sincerely interested in unity then?
No. It's a statement that you don't unite for the sake of unity. You unite for a cause and purpose.
I will not unite with those who's goal is to overthrow the liberty of me or anyone else. I am not going to unite with those who want to overthrow the Constitution. I am not going to unite with corruption. Nor will I unite behind movements who are going to try to take away my right to serve God.
Who on earth blindly unites behind someone who has the intentions to make things worse for society?
Kinda like the Jews did/do with a Warrior King Jesus eh?Is Herman Cain your definition of a uniter?
....Well?!??
Umm the right does not want a uniter. They want a conquering leader.
Ahhh....typical Republican and self-proclaimed "Conservative" BS and irresponsibility. Never willing to TAKE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY eh?If you guys are the example, then you know exactly what you can expect.
I thought you people were all about leadership. Why don't you try LEADING by example for a change?
why don't you put your money where your big fat mouth is? you cannot just bullshit the troops. we've all been around the Bush block, the McCain block, the Palin block, the Bachman Block, the Beck Block the Fox block,, you''ve flat out demonized every republican and conservative idea in the country and now you want to bitch and whine like a fuzzzy dog cause yer bitch obie doodle has to take the heat.. grow a pair whydonchya?
Bush is record for CAMPAIGNING on "I'm a uniter, not a divider" B.S. and ALL the RepubliCON$ lined up behind him with that and used it as one of their bludgeoning tools against any and all critics.
CNN Transcript - Special Event: Gov. Bush: 'I'm a Uniter, Not a Divider' - February 29, 2000
You people continued to use that same argument AGAINST Obama claiming that he's not a uniter, but a divider. Not sure when exactly did Obama claim to a uniter, but that's what you guys did.
Now, you're running away from it once called on your B.S.
Typical, typical, RW irresponsibility. *SMH*
Marc, are you saying Obama never campaigned or meant to be a uniter for the country?
I'm saying he never said it. Wheras Bush did. That was one of his main campaign messages.
Please present where Obama did this, as you RWers have been suggesting for the past 3 years or so now.
Thanks.
Marc, are you saying Obama never campaigned or meant to be a uniter for the country?
I'm saying he never said it. Wheras Bush did. That was one of his main campaign messages.
Please present where Obama did this, as you RWers have been suggesting for the past 3 years or so now.
Thanks.
You are right. He never claimed to be a uniter, but he did promise to be the president of ALL Americans.
.
That would require you guys actually wanting to unite behind a President.
If you guys are the example, then you know exactly what you can expect.
I thought you people were all about leadership. Why don't you try LEADING by example for a change?
We are. We are leading people away from marxism and toward personal responsibility.