geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
This crap:
Newt Gingrich's Three Marriages Mean He Might Make A Strong President -- Really | Fox News
is an excellent example of what happens when someone decides to pimp their professional credentials for cash:
More hilarity at the original link (and it actually gets a lot more funny).
At this point, I am only left to wonder what Ablow's angle is? It's obviously not the perpetuation of legitimate, evidence-based, psychiatric medicine.
Newt Gingrich's Three Marriages Mean He Might Make A Strong President -- Really | Fox News
is an excellent example of what happens when someone decides to pimp their professional credentials for cash:
I want to be coldly analytical, not moralize, here. I want to tell you what Mr. Gingrichs behavior could mean for the country, not for the future of his current marriage. So, heres what one interested in making America stronger can reasonably concludepsychologicallyfrom Mr. Gingrichs behavior during his three marriages:
1) Three women have met Mr. Gingrich and been so moved by his emotional energy and intellect that they decided they wanted to spend the rest of their lives with him.
2) Two of these women felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married.
3 ) One of them felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married for the second time, was not exactly her equal in the looks department and had a wife (Marianne) who wanted to make his life without her as painful as possible.
Conclusion: When three women want to sign on for life with a man who is now running for president, I worry more about whether well be clamoring for a third Gingrich term, not whether well want to let him go after one.
So, as far as I can tell, judging from the psychological data, we have only one real risk to America from his marital history if Newt Gingrich were to become president: We would need to worry that another nation, perhaps a little younger than ours, would be so taken by Mr. Gingrich that it would seduce him into marrying it and becoming its president. And I think that is exceedingly unlikely.
More hilarity at the original link (and it actually gets a lot more funny).
At this point, I am only left to wonder what Ablow's angle is? It's obviously not the perpetuation of legitimate, evidence-based, psychiatric medicine.