...Pro-stem cell president and a pro-stem cell Congress

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Superlative, Jun 22, 2007.

  1. Superlative
    Offline

    Superlative Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,382
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +109
    http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/21/stem.cells.ap/index.html
     
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,520
    Thanks Received:
    5,898
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,931
    Just think, using this line of logic then abortion has ensured that great scientists and leaders have been snuffed out in the womb. With MILLIONS of potential humans eliminated the odds are some of them could have do some GREAT thngs for mankind in all walks of life.

    The liberals have ignored the millions of Americans that are opposed to abortion for a VERY long time now. And in fact if a conservative made a statement like the one above as follows...WE intend to keep bringing this up until we have a Pro Life President and a PRO life Congress... the left would be howling mad.

    As proof one only need look to the democrats attempts to ensure any nominee to the Supreme Court agrees that Roe VS Wade NEVER be overturned.
     
  3. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    I don't think abortion has a lot to do with this.
     
  4. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,520
    Thanks Received:
    5,898
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,931
    You would be wrong. Currently the main source of stem cells that science thinks work the best come from , guess where?

    Perhaps you should do a little research on WHY religious groups are opposed to most stem cell research. It is NOT because religion and science do not work well together.
     
  5. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    They're from embryos.

    Why are religious groups opposed? And let me say if they are opposed then that's fine, they're entitled to their views. But society is entitled to ignore them.

    I have to ask myself, why is government influenced by religious views though?

    Now before this turns into a 'shut up foreigner this is an American policy issue" may I say in my defence that research in the US is extremely important for the rest of the scientific world and while I make a point to stay out of US domestic issues (eg legal/illegal immigration) because they're none of my business, this one affects everyone, especially those, like me, that would benefit from effective research in this area.
     
  6. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,520
    Thanks Received:
    5,898
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,931
  7. taimie
    Offline

    taimie Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    22
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    Please do a search for:

    Open Federal Funding for Stem Cell Research - The Petition Site & Sign!!!!

    Less than 3,000 needed still to reach goal.

    Sorry this site will not let me post direct link yet


    Thank You!
    Taimie
     
  8. plt42
    Offline

    plt42 A Constitutionalist

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    303
    Thanks Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Gulf Coast of Texas
    Ratings:
    +40
    In that line of thinking, wouldn't you have to assume the position of "embryonic predestination"? Is this another discussion of nature vs. nurture?

    Just curious.
     
  9. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    abortion is murder
     
  10. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    I can certainly understand why anyone opposed to abortion on religious or moral principles objects to embryonic stem cell research.

    The potential that abortion material becomes something of great value that actually encourages abortions for profit is obviously there.

    STill abortions are happening, anyway, so the argument that just throwing away that material is just wasted otherwise can be a powerful argument in its defence, too.

    I'll have to ponder this debate a while.

    I am of the opinion that should embryonic material become truly valuable as a clinical tool to save people or cure them, then it WILL cause some people to encourage abortions for profit.

    Off hand I'd say that the probability (under the above circumstances, at least) of aboreted fetuses not becoming a coveted item is practically nil, IF, for example, that material can be used to make cripples whole again, or to save lives of people who might benefit.

    This IS a very difficult issue to resolve if you are, as I am, not opposed to abortions based on the principle that every woman has the right to decide for herself whether to bring a human into existence.
     

Share This Page