TruthOut10
Active Member
- Dec 3, 2012
- 627
- 100
- 28
The real takers in America are not poor people dependent on welfare, but the unproductive, rent-extracting rich
You dont have to be a Tea Party conservative to believe that the economy is threatened when there are too many takers and not enough makers. The takers who threaten the dynamism and fairness of industrial capitalism the most in the 21st century are not the welfare-dependent poor the villains of Tea Party propaganda but the rent-extracting, unproductive rich.
The term rent in this context refers to more than payments to your landlords. As Mike Konczal and many others have argued, profits should be distinguished from rents. Profits from the sale of goods or services in a free market are different from rents extracted from the public by monopolists in various kinds. Unlike profits, rents tend to be based on recurrent fees rather than sales to ever-changing consumers. While productive capitalists industrialists, to use the old-fashioned term need to be active and entrepreneurial in order to keep ahead of the competition, rentiers (the term for people whose income comes from rents, rather than profits) can enjoy a perpetual stream of income even if they are completely passive.
Rents come in as many kinds as there are rentier interests. Land or apartment or rental-house rents flow to landlords. Royalty payments for energy or mineral extraction flow to landowners. Interest payments on loans flow to bankers and other lenders. Royalty payments on patents and copyrights flow to inventors. Professions and guilds and unions can also extract rents from the rest of society, by creating artificial labor cartels to raise wages or professional fees. Tolls are rents paid to the owners of necessary transportation and communications infrastructure. Last but not least, taxes are rents paid to territorial governments for essential public services, including military and police protection.
All of these goods or services are necessary to make or distribute the goods and services generated by productive industry (which can be government-owned or nonprofit, as well as for-profit). If one or more of the sectors providing inputs or infrastructure to productive industry charges excessive rents, then industry can be strangled. Industry cannot flourish if too much rent is paid to landlords, if credit is too expensive, if excessive copyright protections stifle the diffusion of technology. Even progressives must concede that guilds or unions or professions can use the power of labor monopolies to demand excessive incomes for their members and that at some point high taxes really do strangle the economy. (The evidence of successful high-tax-big government countries like those of Scandinavia suggests that you can go safely up to about 40-50 percent of GDP going to government, assuming the taxes are well spent and raised largely by less-distortionary taxes including consumption, property and wealth taxes).
Private sector parasites - Salon.com
You dont have to be a Tea Party conservative to believe that the economy is threatened when there are too many takers and not enough makers. The takers who threaten the dynamism and fairness of industrial capitalism the most in the 21st century are not the welfare-dependent poor the villains of Tea Party propaganda but the rent-extracting, unproductive rich.
The term rent in this context refers to more than payments to your landlords. As Mike Konczal and many others have argued, profits should be distinguished from rents. Profits from the sale of goods or services in a free market are different from rents extracted from the public by monopolists in various kinds. Unlike profits, rents tend to be based on recurrent fees rather than sales to ever-changing consumers. While productive capitalists industrialists, to use the old-fashioned term need to be active and entrepreneurial in order to keep ahead of the competition, rentiers (the term for people whose income comes from rents, rather than profits) can enjoy a perpetual stream of income even if they are completely passive.
Rents come in as many kinds as there are rentier interests. Land or apartment or rental-house rents flow to landlords. Royalty payments for energy or mineral extraction flow to landowners. Interest payments on loans flow to bankers and other lenders. Royalty payments on patents and copyrights flow to inventors. Professions and guilds and unions can also extract rents from the rest of society, by creating artificial labor cartels to raise wages or professional fees. Tolls are rents paid to the owners of necessary transportation and communications infrastructure. Last but not least, taxes are rents paid to territorial governments for essential public services, including military and police protection.
All of these goods or services are necessary to make or distribute the goods and services generated by productive industry (which can be government-owned or nonprofit, as well as for-profit). If one or more of the sectors providing inputs or infrastructure to productive industry charges excessive rents, then industry can be strangled. Industry cannot flourish if too much rent is paid to landlords, if credit is too expensive, if excessive copyright protections stifle the diffusion of technology. Even progressives must concede that guilds or unions or professions can use the power of labor monopolies to demand excessive incomes for their members and that at some point high taxes really do strangle the economy. (The evidence of successful high-tax-big government countries like those of Scandinavia suggests that you can go safely up to about 40-50 percent of GDP going to government, assuming the taxes are well spent and raised largely by less-distortionary taxes including consumption, property and wealth taxes).
Private sector parasites - Salon.com
