Private Parts

Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
It was no victory for Trump

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel
Nothing exonerated Trump for having sex with a pawn star

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel

Sounds like a victory to me.

So his bad behavior was excused and to “celebrate” he engaged in more bad behavior

That is not victory

Are we talking about Clinton, or Trump?


Clinton has consensual sex in the Oval Office, Dems think that's fine and dandy.

Trump has consensual sex 10 years before he won the Oval Office, dems think that is nasty.

Why can't y'all keep your noses out of private affairs?
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
It was no victory for Trump

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel
Nothing exonerated Trump for having sex with a pawn star

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel

Sounds like a victory to me.
Very small compared to what's on the way

What's on the way?
That case against Trump and his former lawyer Michael Cohen contains two claims. The first is for "declaratory relief." Specifically, Daniels is asking the court to declare that the Nondisclosure Agreement was never formed, because Trump never signed the agreement, and he didn't give any consideration under the contract. Consideration is a legal concept meaning payment, or some other bargained-for legal detriment.


It's hard to say what remains of this NDA today. Daniels has largely told the story that was covered under the NDA. In addition, Cohen offered in September to "put an end" to the NDA with Daniels. It's possible the court could conclude there's nothing left to "declare."

The second cause of action contained in the remaining case is another defamation claim. In February, Cohen issued a public statement, stating, "Just because something isn't true doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm or damage." Daniels alleges that Cohen "meant to convey that Ms. Clifford (her real name) is a liar, someone who should not be trusted, and that her claims about her relationship with Mr. Trump is 'something (that) isn't true.'
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
It was no victory for Trump

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel
Nothing exonerated Trump for having sex with a pawn star

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel

Sounds like a victory to me.

So his bad behavior was excused and to “celebrate” he engaged in more bad behavior

That is not victory

Are we talking about Clinton, or Trump?


Clinton has consensual sex in the Oval Office, Dems think that's fine and dandy.

Trump has consensual sex 10 years before he won the Oval Office, dems think that is nasty.

Why can't y'all keep your noses out of private affairs?
Is that your best defense will ? Every time it's mentioned what a disgusting pig of a man Trump is ,you bring up Clinton ? What ever Clintons faults are or were you think that absolves this garbage in our WH NOW ?
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
It was no victory for Trump

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel
Nothing exonerated Trump for having sex with a pawn star

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel

Sounds like a victory to me.
Very small compared to what's on the way

What's on the way?
That case against Trump and his former lawyer Michael Cohen contains two claims. The first is for "declaratory relief." Specifically, Daniels is asking the court to declare that the Nondisclosure Agreement was never formed, because Trump never signed the agreement, and he didn't give any consideration under the contract. Consideration is a legal concept meaning payment, or some other bargained-for legal detriment.


It's hard to say what remains of this NDA today. Daniels has largely told the story that was covered under the NDA. In addition, Cohen offered in September to "put an end" to the NDA with Daniels. It's possible the court could conclude there's nothing left to "declare."

The second cause of action contained in the remaining case is another defamation claim. In February, Cohen issued a public statement, stating, "Just because something isn't true doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm or damage." Daniels alleges that Cohen "meant to convey that Ms. Clifford (her real name) is a liar, someone who should not be trusted, and that her claims about her relationship with Mr. Trump is 'something (that) isn't true.'
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
It was no victory for Trump

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel
Nothing exonerated Trump for having sex with a pawn star

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel

Sounds like a victory to me.

So his bad behavior was excused and to “celebrate” he engaged in more bad behavior

That is not victory

Are we talking about Clinton, or Trump?


Clinton has consensual sex in the Oval Office, Dems think that's fine and dandy.

Trump has consensual sex 10 years before he won the Oval Office, dems think that is nasty.

Why can't y'all keep your noses out of private affairs?
Is that your best defense will ? Every time it's mentioned what a disgusting pig of a man Trump is ,you bring up Clinton ? What ever Clintons faults are or were you think that absolves this garbage in our WH NOW ?


no, ed...


I just like pointing out the HYPOCRISY!
 
44229675_1947791648641487_3059210698480418816_n.jpg
 
It was no victory for Trump

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel
Nothing exonerated Trump for having sex with a pawn star

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel

Sounds like a victory to me.

So his bad behavior was excused and to “celebrate” he engaged in more bad behavior

That is not victory

Are we talking about Clinton, or Trump?


Clinton has consensual sex in the Oval Office, Dems think that's fine and dandy.

Trump has consensual sex 10 years before he won the Oval Office, dems think that is nasty.

Why can't y'all keep your noses out of private affairs?
Is that your best defense will ? Every time it's mentioned what a disgusting pig of a man Trump is ,you bring up Clinton ? What ever Clintons faults are or were you think that absolves this garbage in our WH NOW ?


no, ed...


I just like pointing out the HYPOCRISY!
And you do a great job of it Unfortunately your pointing out is 100% one sided There are imo far more hypocrites on the right than the left but you are blind to them
 
Sounds like a victory to me.

So his bad behavior was excused and to “celebrate” he engaged in more bad behavior

That is not victory

Are we talking about Clinton, or Trump?


Clinton has consensual sex in the Oval Office, Dems think that's fine and dandy.

Trump has consensual sex 10 years before he won the Oval Office, dems think that is nasty.

Why can't y'all keep your noses out of private affairs?
Is that your best defense will ? Every time it's mentioned what a disgusting pig of a man Trump is ,you bring up Clinton ? What ever Clintons faults are or were you think that absolves this garbage in our WH NOW ?


no, ed...


I just like pointing out the HYPOCRISY!
And you do a great job of it Unfortunately your pointing out is 100% one sided There are imo far more hypocrites on the right than the left but you are blind to them
And one more thing Will before I go to the beach ,,I''ll bet a dollar to a doughnut that you have a Trumpy doll in your room
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
It was no victory for Trump

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel
Nothing exonerated Trump for having sex with a pawn star

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel

Sounds like a victory to me.

So his bad behavior was excused and to “celebrate” he engaged in more bad behavior

That is not victory

Are we talking about Clinton, or Trump?


Clinton has consensual sex in the Oval Office, Dems think that's fine and dandy.

Trump has consensual sex 10 years before he won the Oval Office, dems think that is nasty.

Why can't y'all keep your noses out of private affairs?

Clinton was impeached for his behavior

Still want to compare Trump to Clinton?
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES

"...one tiny win..."

:21::auiqs.jpg::laugh::laughing0301::lmao::lol:

Dude, we're winning every day.

Watch out...

With this rate you are going to get tired.

Ahh ain't no ways tarrred.


Why do you guys keep thinking that video is any way relevant ?

HIllary was quoting a black author in the language he used. Do you think she should have changed the grammar?

Try a reading of Mark Twain in the language he used. See what that gets you.
 
So his bad behavior was excused and to “celebrate” he engaged in more bad behavior

That is not victory

Are we talking about Clinton, or Trump?


Clinton has consensual sex in the Oval Office, Dems think that's fine and dandy.

Trump has consensual sex 10 years before he won the Oval Office, dems think that is nasty.

Why can't y'all keep your noses out of private affairs?
Is that your best defense will ? Every time it's mentioned what a disgusting pig of a man Trump is ,you bring up Clinton ? What ever Clintons faults are or were you think that absolves this garbage in our WH NOW ?


no, ed...


I just like pointing out the HYPOCRISY!
And you do a great job of it Unfortunately your pointing out is 100% one sided There are imo far more hypocrites on the right than the left but you are blind to them
And one more thing Will before I go to the beach ,,I''ll bet a dollar to a doughnut that you have a Trumpy doll in your room
Closest I have to a Trump in my house, is a deck of cards, with Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, and CLubs
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
It was no victory for Trump

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel
Nothing exonerated Trump for having sex with a pawn star

The judge ruled that Trumps statements about Daniels was not libel

Sounds like a victory to me.

So his bad behavior was excused and to “celebrate” he engaged in more bad behavior

That is not victory

Are we talking about Clinton, or Trump?


Clinton has consensual sex in the Oval Office, Dems think that's fine and dandy.

Trump has consensual sex 10 years before he won the Oval Office, dems think that is nasty.

Why can't y'all keep your noses out of private affairs?

Clinton was impeached for his behavior

Still want to compare Trump to Clinton?

Clinton was impeached for his behavior

Why not?

Clinton was impeached for his actions IN OFFICE.

you're bring up crap that happened 10 years BEFORE Trump took office.
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
1jcr56.jpg
 
Pop quiz: Suppose you were a president trying to get past an embarrassing story about sex with a porn star named Stormy, and you finally get one tiny win in what will undoubtedly be litigation that runs longer than “Game of Thrones.” Would you:

A) Pretend nothing is happening and confine all your public comments to that exciting new plan for across-the-board budget cuts.

B) Take your wife on a vacation in which you will actually be seen spending time together.

C) Launch a tweet vowing to “go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer.”

Well, yeah, C.

“He should not have said that,” the soon-to-retire House Speaker Paul Ryan remarked during a morning news interview. The look on Ryan’s face was somber, but somewhere in the back of his eyes you could see him setting off fireworks and yelling, “I’m out of here, suckers!”

It was definitely an improvement over Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana’s defensive: “We’ve all done something like that before.” To which Kennedy unhelpfully added that he believes the president “grows anxious when he has unexpressed thoughts.”

Republicans who are trying to get elected in a year when women are the party’s big problem were obviously not thrilled when the president reminded everyone of his animal-name-calling habit. Trump lost the women’s vote in the last election, although he did win a narrow majority of white women. That was nearly two years and a lot of insults ago. We’ll have to see how many of them have noticed that he reminds them of that kid in grade school who used to call girls “Fatso” or “Bowlegs.”

And this time, he picked on a woman who’s both decidedly hard to insult and eager to promote her new memoir, which includes disparaging descriptions of the presidential private parts.

Naturally there was a Stormy response. (“In addition to his … umm … shortcomings, he has demonstrated his incompetence, hatred of women and lack of self control on Twitter AGAIN! And perhaps a penchant for bestiality. Game on, Tiny.”)

always enjoyed writing about the face-of-a-pig message he sent me. At the time Trump was in serious financial difficulties, I referred to him in a column as a well-known “thousandaire.”

Clearly I hurt him more than he did me.
FROM the NY TIMES
1jcr56.jpg






10425004_10204663466454667_7013233769437446050_n.jpg

.


 
Horseface? Do you mean the whiter than snow-white who pretends to be an Indian?

Dude.................can you please keep the scandals against Trump straight please?

The comment about Pochahontas is directed as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who said she had Native Americans in her family tree. Trump thought it was not true, and resorted to calling her Pochahontas as an insult. Suddenly, when she gets a DNA test that proves she has NA's in her family line, Trump is no longer concerned with her.

Horseface is the term he has started to use against Stormy Daniels. Daniels is the adult film actress that he had sign an NDA for 130,000 dollars so she wouldn't talk about the affair.

No, Pochahontas and Horseface are two different people. Do try to keep up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top