Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
EdwardBaiamonte, you support the government regulations, (i.e. government regulatory systems) which improved both the European Union’s and the United States economies, and you support the Republican Party which is generally opposed to governments’ regulatory systems? Isn’t that contradictory?So far as i know you are a worthless communist who supports 1001 interventions in the Republican free market all moving toward communism and more millions dead. I support what Europe has done to the extent it has inadvertently promoted Republican capitalism and resulted in more freedom and capitalism than we have in America.EdwardBaiamonte, the Brussel’s and the California effects refers to the economic pressures due to one government’s regulations required superior standards for a product, effectively inducing other governments to follow the leader; Thus in the USA, California’s higher standards for some products effectively became the national standard.This is true in Europe for example because, despite having higher taxes, they have more capitalism in many areas than we do. Remember it was Europe that found Microsoft to be a monopoly first. An average Parisian will choose between 4 cell providers and pay about half what we do in America. You can read the "Brussels Affect" and many others if you want to learn about European capitalism.Fncceo, no, they provide every individual of their nation’s Wi-Fi, medical insurance, railroads and other public transportation users at lesser expense and in a manner superior to that of the United States.
I’m pleased and surprised that you're amiable to some government regulations. I’m accustomed to responding to many other posters within many groups of internet groups, who are generally opposed to any or most governments’ regulations, (i.e. “pure” libertarians). I (apparently mistakenly) believed you to be such a pure libertarian. You and I certainly have had our differences. Your post #14, seems contrary to your post #15?...
We are an insolvent nation at this point in time, and i'm far from the only one pointing this out
must be a good thing since we have about the highest standard of living in the world.
www.wikihow.com
We are 250 years in now and Americans are the richest people in human history . That makes it idiotic to compare it to musical chairs. Enjoy your cell phone, computer, flat screen TV, and GPS but don't think about economics until you have at least some education.We are an insolvent nation at this point in time, and i'm far from the only one pointing this out
must be a good thing since we have about the highest standard of living in the world.How to Play Musical Chairs: 11 Steps (with Pictures) - wikiHow
Musical chairs is a fun game to play with a group of friends. This traditional game is easy to play with a few simple supplies. You can play musical chairs at school, a birthday party, a club meeting, or just for fun with some of your...
with the greatest disparity since the Roman empireAmericans are the richest people in human history
God set the rules. Free, peaceful, voluntary, and capitalistic interactions among people, without govt intervention, is a natural right from God and the basis of our founding documents.Private businesses do not set the rules of business nor do they determine what business is legal or illegal.
with the greatest disparity since the Roman empireAmericans are the richest people in human history
and more debt that we can pay interest on
along with an artificially propped up economy
so......be quick when the music stops Ed
~S~
yes there is huge huge and blessed disparity. Roman poor did not have flat screen TV's, cell phones, GPS, and CAT scans.with the greatest disparity since the Roman empireAmericans are the richest people in human history
Please don't lie despite your natural tendencies to do so. Conservatives support capitalism in Europe and the USA, not impoverishing, libcommie regulation. When we talk about the Brussels Effect we are talking about the inadvertent movement toward Republican capitalism that resulted from frictions among EU members.You support the government regulations, (i.e. government regulatory systems) which improved both the European Union’s and the United States economies, and you support the Republican Party which is generally opposed to governments’ regulatory systems? Isn’t that contradictory?
Respectfully, Supposn
You support the government regulations, (i.e. government regulatory systems) which improved both the European Union’s and the United States economies,
I'm amused at your heartfelt belief that Government does things cheaper and better than the Private Sector, Supposn! I've got a whole lifetime of experience that tells me that's seldom if ever the case! If you want it to cost three times as much and take twice as long to get done...have Government do it!EdwardBaiamonte, the Brussel’s and the California effects refers to the economic pressures due to one government’s regulations required superior standards for a product, effectively inducing other governments to follow the leader; Thus in the USA, California’s higher standards for some products effectively became the national standard.This is true in Europe for example because, despite having higher taxes, they have more capitalism in many areas than we do. Remember it was Europe that found Microsoft to be a monopoly first. An average Parisian will choose between 4 cell providers and pay about half what we do in America. You can read the "Brussels Affect" and many others if you want to learn about European capitalism.Fncceo, no, they provide every individual of their nation’s Wi-Fi, medical insurance, railroads and other public transportation users at lesser expense and in a manner superior to that of the United States.
I’m pleased and surprised that you're amiable to some government regulations. I’m accustomed to responding to many other posters within many groups of internet groups, who are generally opposed to any or most governments’ regulations, (i.e. “pure” libertarians). I (apparently mistakenly) believed you to be such a pure libertarian. You and I certainly have had our differences.
Your post #14, seems contrary to your post #15?
Respectfully, Supposn
Yes, to a liberal a bureaucratic monopoly is the best, most efficient producer. It's dumb beyond words or liberal.I'm amused at your heartfelt belief that Government does things cheaper and better than the Private Sector, Supposn! I've got a whole lifetime of experience that tells me that's seldom if ever the case! If you want it to cost three times as much and take twice as long to get done...have Government do it!EdwardBaiamonte, the Brussel’s and the California effects refers to the economic pressures due to one government’s regulations required superior standards for a product, effectively inducing other governments to follow the leader; Thus in the USA, California’s higher standards for some products effectively became the national standard.This is true in Europe for example because, despite having higher taxes, they have more capitalism in many areas than we do. Remember it was Europe that found Microsoft to be a monopoly first. An average Parisian will choose between 4 cell providers and pay about half what we do in America. You can read the "Brussels Affect" and many others if you want to learn about European capitalism.Fncceo, no, they provide every individual of their nation’s Wi-Fi, medical insurance, railroads and other public transportation users at lesser expense and in a manner superior to that of the United States.
I’m pleased and surprised that you're amiable to some government regulations. I’m accustomed to responding to many other posters within many groups of internet groups, who are generally opposed to any or most governments’ regulations, (i.e. “pure” libertarians). I (apparently mistakenly) believed you to be such a pure libertarian. You and I certainly have had our differences.
Your post #14, seems contrary to your post #15?
Respectfully, Supposn
My father was a Fire Chief, Edward. When he retired from the Fire Department he was talked into running for town Selectman. He's the one that told me that if you want it to cost three times as much and take twice as long to do...have Government do it! Government waste drove him crazy and there was very little he could do about it. Civil Servants in many ways have almost zero chance of being fired for poor performance and they know it. I'm not saying that ALL Civil Servants are that way but there are far too many that could care less about doing things quickly and efficiently.Yes, to a liberal a bureaucratic monopoly is the best, most efficient producer. It's dumb beyond words or liberal.I'm amused at your heartfelt belief that Government does things cheaper and better than the Private Sector, Supposn! I've got a whole lifetime of experience that tells me that's seldom if ever the case! If you want it to cost three times as much and take twice as long to get done...have Government do it!EdwardBaiamonte, the Brussel’s and the California effects refers to the economic pressures due to one government’s regulations required superior standards for a product, effectively inducing other governments to follow the leader; Thus in the USA, California’s higher standards for some products effectively became the national standard.This is true in Europe for example because, despite having higher taxes, they have more capitalism in many areas than we do. Remember it was Europe that found Microsoft to be a monopoly first. An average Parisian will choose between 4 cell providers and pay about half what we do in America. You can read the "Brussels Affect" and many others if you want to learn about European capitalism.Fncceo, no, they provide every individual of their nation’s Wi-Fi, medical insurance, railroads and other public transportation users at lesser expense and in a manner superior to that of the United States.
I’m pleased and surprised that you're amiable to some government regulations. I’m accustomed to responding to many other posters within many groups of internet groups, who are generally opposed to any or most governments’ regulations, (i.e. “pure” libertarians). I (apparently mistakenly) believed you to be such a pure libertarian. You and I certainly have had our differences.
Your post #14, seems contrary to your post #15?
Respectfully, Supposn
I'm not saying that ALL Civil Servants are that way but there are far too many that could care less about doing things quickly and efficiently.
So you are a Republican capitalist or you want Medicare-For-All communism?I agree that the private sector is not always the best solution.
But it usually is.
I always remember the summer of my Senior year in High School. My father got me on at the Department of Public Works. Myself and another kid were supposed to paint crosswalks. They gave us a truck, paint, the stencils, traffic cones and a list of about 60 crosswalks.I agree that the private sector is not always the best solution.
But it usually is.
EdwardBaiamonte, you correctly posted, “it was Europe that found Microsoft to be a monopoly first. An average Parisian will choose between 4 cell providers and pay about half what we do in America. You can read the "Brussels Affect" and many others if you want to learn about European capitalism”.
The Brussel’s and the California effects refers to the economic pressures due to one government’s regulations required superior standards for a product, effectively inducing other governments to follow the leader; Thus in the USA, California’s higher standards for some products effectively became the national standard. That’s an example of California’s government’s regulations inducing an improving the goods and service products that were not before readily available to our entire nation.
You acknowledge the economic improvement is due to government’s regulations, and you’re a conservative and you agree with Republicans’ general opposition to government’s regulations? You’re contradicting yourself.
Respectfully, Supposn
EdwardBaiamonte, we all understand you. Within your imagination, any facts or opinions that are contrary to your opinions are false. You do not provide authoritative links proving the facts I posted were false, but you rather continue describing me with your nonsensical adjectives.… Please don't lie despite your natural tendencies to do so. Conservatives support capitalism in Europe and the USA, not impoverishing, libcommie regulation. When we talk about the Brussels Effect we are talking about the inadvertent movement toward Republican capitalism that resulted from frictions among EU members.
Toddsterpatriot, I’m an old man and no longer crawl under cars. There were many cars built to comply with the more stringent California emissions regulations, but living on the East coast and not being a professional mechanic, I’m not surprised that I was never aware if I encountered one of those California vehicles.Why do you feel California regulations induce an improvement?… Thus in the USA, California’s higher standards for some products effectively became the national standard. That’s an example of California’s government’s regulations inducing an improvement of goods and service products. ...
Be as specific as you can.
