Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope, emily, I won't let you go there now anymore than I have in the past.
There does not have to be a spirit of universal agreement or reconciliation, the latter a wasted word in therapy if ever there was one.
Our system is not going to change for you.
Houston is not going to change for you, and neither are the word and the precinct.
We reach consensus by Constitutional standards, which means Congress legislates, President manages, and SCOTUS opines, and the losers go along until they become the majority.
emily, we have been through this before.
Your opinion is nonsense.
Once and if you get the majority, you can do as you please.
In the meantime, the does abide, and you must subside.
Yell all you want, but you will follow the law.
Sigh. The law is being followed, the 14th is being followed, and so forth. Your concept of 'reconciliation' simply is not compatible with how we elect people and create legislation.
Sigh. The law is being followed, the 14th is being followed, and so forth. Your concept of 'reconciliation' simply is not compatible with how we elect people and create legislation.
We are talking about today, and, yes, the law is working.
Get a majority and legislate.
Students want Woodrow Wilson's name removed from Princeton
I get the point being contested by the Princeton students, but don't think the solution is removing people from history books and landmarks that are their legacy.
What are we going to do -- remove Leonardo da Vinci from history books because, at one point, he mistakenly theorized that the penis must have some internal tract connected to the lungs to provide the "breathe" to sustain an erection? Should he be axed for that?
And Jefferson axed for believing that Blacks should be deported back to Africa.
So forget all his other achievements and contributions to human political development.
Is that one point enough to strike the man out, bench him for the rest of eternity, and not include him on the team that helped to build the path to democratic governance?
If half of Congress voted for or against Civil Rights, or the Iraq War (or extending federal govt into health care without first Amending the Constitution)
Are we going to strike down that half of Congress from the history books for being on the wrong side?
WTF Who is going to be left?
If you are going to protest, then why not RESOLVE the conflicts to begin with.
Then you don't need to contest one side or the other if both reach agreement on solutions.
Gee Whiz! What next?
Your hold them accountable in elections.We are talking about today, and, yes, the law is working.
Get a majority and legislate.
That still does not account for the damage done
because people and politicians did not respect equality to begin with.
I agree we have no choice but to use the given process.
But unlike you, I recognize damage has been done by violations
that could have been prevented. You act like this is the cost of doing business.
I am saying it was not fully following Constitutional standards,
and that is why it is costing the taxpayers so much.
I still use the system as you argue as well.
But the difference between you and me is that you do not
expect to hold officials accountable for the unnecessary cost of
damages caused in the meantime, because beliefs and creeds
were not respected equally on both sides of these issues. I do!