basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,053
- 2,220
- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's see, infrastructure, mission to Mars, trade policy bringing jobs back to America, do you think Hillary Clinton cared about any of those things?He has my support on this and the trade issues. The guy does have a few good points.
For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
The Moon is our gateway to the rest of the Solar system.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
The Moon is our gateway to the rest of the Solar system.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
President Donald Trump’s gutting of many government entities has created some serious outrage from both sides of the isle, but one scientific agency Trump isn’t really messing with is NASA. The newly minted NASA Transition Authorization Act which just gained Trump’s signature lays out the agency’s budget for 2018, and it includes almost the exact same amount of funding as NASA has in 2017, and more than in both 2016 and 2015. Oh, and Trump definitely wants humans to visit Mars, too.He has my support on this and the trade issues. The guy does have a few good points.
If the orange clown starts a trade war, then we will lose jobs, and possibly see a Second Great Republican Depression. No money then for ambitious projects, here or in space.Let's see, infrastructure, mission to Mars, trade policy bringing jobs back to America, do you think Hillary Clinton cared about any of those things?He has my support on this and the trade issues. The guy does have a few good points.
Materials, and a much shallower gravity well.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
The Moon is our gateway to the rest of the Solar system.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
That's not a reason to go to the Moon. The Moon is a gateway possibly in the sense of a slingshot, getting onto the Moon doesn't actually do much for us.
Don't worry...he'll make the Martians pay for it.
Can't afford healthcare, can't afford food, can't afford so many things, but can afford to go to Mars, build a wall and beef up the military.
Priorities, ie, fuck you, you're poor.
Materials, and a much shallower gravity well.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
Don't worry...he'll make the Martians pay for it.
Can't afford healthcare, can't afford food, can't afford so many things, but can afford to go to Mars, build a wall and beef up the military.
Priorities, ie, fuck you, you're poor.
If you are going for a single shot bragging mission, cheaper to go directly to Mars. If you are going for long term exploration, go to the moon first, and mine much of the necessary material there. And who knows what wonderous things we would find in the exploration of the moon as we went to Mars?Materials, and a much shallower gravity well.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
Materials..... like what?
Yeah, it has lots of oxygen in the soil, and silicon, and some iron and aluminum. How much would it cost to get these things? Probably a lot more than recycling the stuff we already use but don't need, that's for sure.
And what about lower gravity? You still need to get people from Earth to the Moon in order to then send them to Mars.
Is it easier to send people to the Moon then to Mars, or just send them to Mars in the first place?
The moon seems a no-brainer to me.If you are going for a single shot bragging mission, cheaper to go directly to Mars. If you are going for long term exploration, go to the moon first, and mine much of the necessary material there. And who knows what wonderous things we would find in the exploration of the moon as we went to Mars?Materials, and a much shallower gravity well.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
Materials..... like what?
Yeah, it has lots of oxygen in the soil, and silicon, and some iron and aluminum. How much would it cost to get these things? Probably a lot more than recycling the stuff we already use but don't need, that's for sure.
And what about lower gravity? You still need to get people from Earth to the Moon in order to then send them to Mars.
Is it easier to send people to the Moon then to Mars, or just send them to Mars in the first place?
If you are going for a single shot bragging mission, cheaper to go directly to Mars. If you are going for long term exploration, go to the moon first, and mine much of the necessary material there. And who knows what wonderous things we would find in the exploration of the moon as we went to Mars?Materials, and a much shallower gravity well.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
Materials..... like what?
Yeah, it has lots of oxygen in the soil, and silicon, and some iron and aluminum. How much would it cost to get these things? Probably a lot more than recycling the stuff we already use but don't need, that's for sure.
And what about lower gravity? You still need to get people from Earth to the Moon in order to then send them to Mars.
Is it easier to send people to the Moon then to Mars, or just send them to Mars in the first place?
The moon seems a no-brainer to me.If you are going for a single shot bragging mission, cheaper to go directly to Mars. If you are going for long term exploration, go to the moon first, and mine much of the necessary material there. And who knows what wonderous things we would find in the exploration of the moon as we went to Mars?Materials, and a much shallower gravity well.For the time being sending a manned mission to Mars is a worthless endeavor. We need to go back to the Moon first.
Why? What's on the Moon?
Materials..... like what?
Yeah, it has lots of oxygen in the soil, and silicon, and some iron and aluminum. How much would it cost to get these things? Probably a lot more than recycling the stuff we already use but don't need, that's for sure.
And what about lower gravity? You still need to get people from Earth to the Moon in order to then send them to Mars.
Is it easier to send people to the Moon then to Mars, or just send them to Mars in the first place?
It's closer to test out all the systems necessary for getting to and settling on Mars.