Youwerecreated
VIP Member
- Nov 29, 2010
- 13,273
- 165
- 83
Good reading material here.
Evolution - Conservapedia
What a joke.
Kinda like when your side relies on wiki to explain your position ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good reading material here.
Evolution - Conservapedia
What a joke.
Good reading material here.
Evolution - Conservapedia
What a joke.
Kinda like when your side relies on wiki to explain your position ?
Ok, what are those limits, what are the mechanics of them, and where is the evidence that such limits exist?I do believe changes can happen within a group but it is limited,i believe you believe the same thing, but where we differ is that i believe there are limits and someone caused those limits.
Links to the peer-reviewed articles that demonstrate these?We who believe in creation would say there are DNA barriers that prevent changes that are not in line with what the creator wanted. I believe the creator allowed just enough room in the ability to change so we could adapt to new or changing enviornments but if we go beyond the limits it can result in sickness and or death.
Why would you think we could repeat the beginning of life? We'd have to know exactly what the conditions and circumstances were, and we don't. We have created amino acids under probably inaccurate but relatively close duplication.If very intelligent men cannot under controlled circumstances repeat the beginning of life what makes you think an untintelligent natural process could do it ?
Humans weren't the result of evolution you say?
Okay, I'm always ready to listen to someone's comological theoies.
Where did we come from, then?
Remember, support your theory with empirical evidence, please.
My only empirical evidence is based on faith in what the bible says.
Sorry, but that's not empirical evidence.
The bible say's we came from the ground do you agree ?
The bible say we came from the ground? Not GOD involved in that process, then?
The same evidence the theory of macroevolution is based on ,faith.
Faith derived from an supported by empirical evidence to sustain it.
But, yes, I agree that one needs faith either way.
Eother you have faith that scientific method can lead you to answers or you do not.
That is certainly true.
Humans weren't the result of evolution you say?
Okay, I'm always ready to listen to someone's comological theoies.
Where did we come from, then?
Remember, support your theory with empirical evidence, please.
My only empirical evidence is based on faith in what the bible says. The bible say's we came from the ground do you agree ?
The same evidence the theory of macroevolution is based on ,faith.
What a joke.
Kinda like when your side relies on wiki to explain your position ?
You will have to try harder than that, Chimpy McChimp.
Ok, what are those limits, what are the mechanics of them, and where is the evidence that such limits exist?I do believe changes can happen within a group but it is limited,i believe you believe the same thing, but where we differ is that i believe there are limits and someone caused those limits.
Links to the peer-reviewed articles that demonstrate these?We who believe in creation would say there are DNA barriers that prevent changes that are not in line with what the creator wanted. I believe the creator allowed just enough room in the ability to change so we could adapt to new or changing enviornments but if we go beyond the limits it can result in sickness and or death.
Why would you think we could repeat the beginning of life? We'd have to know exactly what the conditions and circumstances were, and we don't. We have created amino acids under probably inaccurate but relatively close duplication.If very intelligent men cannot under controlled circumstances repeat the beginning of life what makes you think an untintelligent natural process could do it ?
For thousands of years, no one knew how the sun worked. It required nuclear physics to understand. So no one could duplicate it. We still can't duplicate it for a number of reasons. Does this mean that the sun is a god, or a vehicle of the gods, or exists only through divine intervention just because we couldn't/can't duplicate it?
Kinda like when your side relies on wiki to explain your position ?
You will have to try harder than that, Chimpy McChimp.
I am at peace with my views.
Can you point out something from the site that was inaccurate ?
No, you didn't. Or you misunderstood.I don't recall the article but it was from the biology dept at the university of iowa where they mentioned DNA barriers.
If you can't show how life began how can you show all life came about through evolution ?
You will have to try harder than that, Chimpy McChimp.
I am at peace with my views.
Can you point out something from the site that was inaccurate ?
Sure, saying that the fossil record does not support evolution is laughable. If it doesn't, why don't you find trilobite and dolphin fossils in the same strata, rather than being seperated by 100s of millions of years?
No, you didn't. Or you misunderstood.I don't recall the article but it was from the biology dept at the university of iowa where they mentioned DNA barriers.
If you can't show how life began how can you show all life came about through evolution ?
Since the beginning of life is not part of the theory of evolution, you don't need to. Or do you need to demonstrate how steel is created in order to show how cars have changed over the years?
What do you think prevents sexual reproduction from all the different kinds of animals and that humans can't reproduce with anykind but it's own ?
Catholics have believed in evolution for years. Even the two previous Popes.
It's American Christians that believe in "magical creation" and "irreducible complexity".
Despite all evidence to the contrary, they even believe conservative economic policies work. Those people are brainwashed.
I'm not questioning your honesty, just your interpretation of the article. I can't find the thread on the hannity forums and I don't know the article, so I can't really talk about it.Yes i was debating Greycloud on the sean hannity forum and produced the article but since my stroke i am having problems remembering some things. Not making excuses but it is the truth.
What do you think prevents sexual reproduction from all the different kinds of animals and that humans can't reproduce with anykind but it's own ?
Lions and tigers mating?
Grizzly and polar bears?
Horses and donkeys?
Am I living in a fantasy world where that stuff happens routinely, or is this poster who claims it's impossible living in said fantasy world?
So you are in disagreement with evolutionist Mark Ridley, who currently serves as a professor of zoology at Oxford University, who was forced to confess: "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favour of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation."
What do you think prevents sexual reproduction from all the different kinds of animals and that humans can't reproduce with anykind but it's own ?
No, you didn't. Or you misunderstood.I don't recall the article but it was from the biology dept at the university of iowa where they mentioned DNA barriers.
If you can't show how life began how can you show all life came about through evolution ?
Since the beginning of life is not part of the theory of evolution, you don't need to. Or do you need to demonstrate how steel is created in order to show how cars have changed over the years?
I'm not questioning your honesty, just your interpretation of the article. I can't find the thread on the hannity forums and I don't know the article, so I can't really talk about it.Yes i was debating Greycloud on the sean hannity forum and produced the article but since my stroke i am having problems remembering some things. Not making excuses but it is the truth.