Youwerecreated
VIP Member
- Nov 29, 2010
- 13,273
- 165
- 83
So you are in disagreement with evolutionist Mark Ridley, who currently serves as a professor of zoology at Oxford University, who was forced to confess: "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favour of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation."
Finish the quote, where Dr. Ridley goes on to say that other evidence is so strong for evolution that we don't need the fossil record for support. It seems odd to me to use an interview strongly in favor of evolution as evidence against it.
Dr. Mark Ridley " from the false idea that the fossil record provides an important part of the evidence that evolution took place" "Evolution is proven by a totally separate set of arguments"
Can you name these set of arguments that prove evolution as Ridley states ?
Finishing on the fossil record.
The fossil record showed no evolution change and that is the reason why palaeontologists , Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould claimed that the fossil record of any any one species of animal is usually as follows. An ancestral form in the sediments,as a fossil fully formed. Fossils of the same species collected from later deposits show no evolutionary change. So they created a new theory called punctuated equilibrium.