Poll: Record number of Americans believe in Man-made Climate change

[Toddsterpatriot]

Most Americans won’t spend more more than $1 a month in higher electricity bills to fight global warming, according to a new Associated Press-University of Chicago poll.

Only 57 percent of Americans would be willing to spend the extra cash to fight global warming, according to the poll, and 39 percent said they’d spend up to $10 a month to stave off warming.

The polling means that less than 40 percent of Americans are willing to pay for Obama’s Clean Power Plan. The plan, which is intended to slow global warming, is expected to cost a staggering $41 billion annually, which equates to about $10.74 a month for each American.

Poll: Most Americans Aren’t Willing To Pay For Obama’s Global Warming Plans

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it, which is because most of uis will be dead before this comes to a head or the benefits of the programs are shown.

This is to be expected... people are short sighted.

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it

I guess the doom-and-gloomers lying and cheating and exaggerations have had an effect.

Yes, stupid people are easily fooled by the deniers' lies and exaggerations. Like the ones you post, for instance.

And then you have the geniuses, AOC and Gore......

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Most Americans won’t spend more more than $1 a month in higher electricity bills to fight global warming, according to a new Associated Press-University of Chicago poll.

Only 57 percent of Americans would be willing to spend the extra cash to fight global warming, according to the poll, and 39 percent said they’d spend up to $10 a month to stave off warming.

The polling means that less than 40 percent of Americans are willing to pay for Obama’s Clean Power Plan. The plan, which is intended to slow global warming, is expected to cost a staggering $41 billion annually, which equates to about $10.74 a month for each American.

Poll: Most Americans Aren’t Willing To Pay For Obama’s Global Warming Plans

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it, which is because most of uis will be dead before this comes to a head or the benefits of the programs are shown.

This is to be expected... people are short sighted.

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it

I guess the doom-and-gloomers lying and cheating and exaggerations have had an effect.

Yes, stupid people are easily fooled by the deniers' lies and exaggerations. Like the ones you post, for instance.

And then you have the geniuses, AOC and Gore......

But the dumber people are the deniers who reject the science because of what the wingut blogosphere misinterprets for them.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Most Americans won’t spend more more than $1 a month in higher electricity bills to fight global warming, according to a new Associated Press-University of Chicago poll.

Only 57 percent of Americans would be willing to spend the extra cash to fight global warming, according to the poll, and 39 percent said they’d spend up to $10 a month to stave off warming.

The polling means that less than 40 percent of Americans are willing to pay for Obama’s Clean Power Plan. The plan, which is intended to slow global warming, is expected to cost a staggering $41 billion annually, which equates to about $10.74 a month for each American.

Poll: Most Americans Aren’t Willing To Pay For Obama’s Global Warming Plans

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it, which is because most of uis will be dead before this comes to a head or the benefits of the programs are shown.

This is to be expected... people are short sighted.

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it

I guess the doom-and-gloomers lying and cheating and exaggerations have had an effect.

Yes, stupid people are easily fooled by the deniers' lies and exaggerations. Like the ones you post, for instance.

And then you have the geniuses, AOC and Gore......

But the dumber people are the deniers who reject the science because of what the wingut blogosphere misinterprets for them.

Because the smart ones want to waste trillions to reduce global temps in 2080 by 0.1 degrees. DURR.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it, which is because most of uis will be dead before this comes to a head or the benefits of the programs are shown.

This is to be expected... people are short sighted.

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it

I guess the doom-and-gloomers lying and cheating and exaggerations have had an effect.

Yes, stupid people are easily fooled by the deniers' lies and exaggerations. Like the ones you post, for instance.

And then you have the geniuses, AOC and Gore......

But the dumber people are the deniers who reject the science because of what the wingut blogosphere misinterprets for them.

Because the smart ones want to waste trillions to reduce global temps in 2080 by 0.1 degrees. DURR.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that. Hey, wait a minute...youre not just trolling...you're actually stupid enough to believe that stuff. Ha, i have been overestimating you.

 

[westwall]

Most Americans won’t spend more more than $1 a month in higher electricity bills to fight global warming, according to a new Associated Press-University of Chicago poll.

Only 57 percent of Americans would be willing to spend the extra cash to fight global warming, according to the poll, and 39 percent said they’d spend up to $10 a month to stave off warming.

The polling means that less than 40 percent of Americans are willing to pay for Obama’s Clean Power Plan. The plan, which is intended to slow global warming, is expected to cost a staggering $41 billion annually, which equates to about $10.74 a month for each American.

Poll: Most Americans Aren’t Willing To Pay For Obama’s Global Warming Plans

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it, which is because most of uis will be dead before this comes to a head or the benefits of the programs are shown.

This is to be expected... people are short sighted.

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it

I guess the doom-and-gloomers lying and cheating and exaggerations have had an effect.

Yes, stupid people are easily fooled by the deniers' lies and exaggerations. Like the ones you post, for instance.

Pot, meet kettle.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Most Americans won’t spend more more than $1 a month in higher electricity bills to fight global warming, according to a new Associated Press-University of Chicago poll.

Only 57 percent of Americans would be willing to spend the extra cash to fight global warming, according to the poll, and 39 percent said they’d spend up to $10 a month to stave off warming.

The polling means that less than 40 percent of Americans are willing to pay for Obama’s Clean Power Plan. The plan, which is intended to slow global warming, is expected to cost a staggering $41 billion annually, which equates to about $10.74 a month for each American.

Poll: Most Americans Aren’t Willing To Pay For Obama’s Global Warming Plans

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it, which is because most of uis will be dead before this comes to a head or the benefits of the programs are shown.

This is to be expected... people are short sighted.

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it

I guess the doom-and-gloomers lying and cheating and exaggerations have had an effect.

Yes, stupid people are easily fooled by the deniers' lies and exaggerations. Like the ones you post, for instance.

Pot, meet kettle.

Oh look,another unsupported, whiny post by westwall. This must be a day that ends in 'y'.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So, they believe in it, but they are not personally willing to pay for anything for it

I guess the doom-and-gloomers lying and cheating and exaggerations have had an effect.

Yes, stupid people are easily fooled by the deniers' lies and exaggerations. Like the ones you post, for instance.

And then you have the geniuses, AOC and Gore......

But the dumber people are the deniers who reject the science because of what the wingut blogosphere misinterprets for them.

Because the smart ones want to waste trillions to reduce global temps in 2080 by 0.1 degrees. DURR.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that. Hey, wait a minute...youre not just trolling...you're actually stupid enough to believe that stuff. Ha, i have been overestimating you.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that.

I agree, the actual reduction will be less than 0.1 degrees.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes, stupid people are easily fooled by the deniers' lies and exaggerations. Like the ones you post, for instance.

And then you have the geniuses, AOC and Gore......

But the dumber people are the deniers who reject the science because of what the wingut blogosphere misinterprets for them.

Because the smart ones want to waste trillions to reduce global temps in 2080 by 0.1 degrees. DURR.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that. Hey, wait a minute...youre not just trolling...you're actually stupid enough to believe that stuff. Ha, i have been overestimating you.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that.

I agree, the actual reduction will be less than 0.1 degrees.

So what? I dont turn to ignorant deniers and trolls for opinions on science. But, good job using your words, son. *pats the toddinator's head

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And then you have the geniuses, AOC and Gore......

But the dumber people are the deniers who reject the science because of what the wingut blogosphere misinterprets for them.

Because the smart ones want to waste trillions to reduce global temps in 2080 by 0.1 degrees. DURR.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that. Hey, wait a minute...youre not just trolling...you're actually stupid enough to believe that stuff. Ha, i have been overestimating you.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that.

I agree, the actual reduction will be less than 0.1 degrees.

So what? I dont turn to ignorant deniers and trolls for opinions on science. But, good job using your words, son. *pats the toddinator's head

So what?

You want to waste trillions to make an unmeasurable impact on temperatures,
and all you have to say is "So what?"

So fuck off, moron.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

But the dumber people are the deniers who reject the science because of what the wingut blogosphere misinterprets for them.

Because the smart ones want to waste trillions to reduce global temps in 2080 by 0.1 degrees. DURR.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that. Hey, wait a minute...youre not just trolling...you're actually stupid enough to believe that stuff. Ha, i have been overestimating you.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that.

I agree, the actual reduction will be less than 0.1 degrees.

So what? I dont turn to ignorant deniers and trolls for opinions on science. But, good job using your words, son. *pats the toddinator's head

So what?

You want to waste trillions to make an unmeasurable impact on temperatures,
and all you have to say is "So what?"

So fuck off, moron.

No ya idiot, I said "so what" to your idiotic lie. Damn you are dumb sometimes.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

 

[skookerasbil]

Of course it is real. The science has been settled for years and it has been fossil fuel companies with their junk science and propaganda arm that has created this denialist movement.

So, yes it is 73%. It will one day be 98% except for the right-wing nutters who reject all science.

Soon, and it has to be real soon, there will be real action to curb greenhouse gases. Trump and the denialist movement will be thrown to the dump heap of history where they belong.

Again....the AGW k00ks taking bows in front of banners! Been going on for 20 years.....poll after poll.

The fact is, the science still isnt mattering for dick after 20 years.

Banners billboards and symbols are ghey. Only matters who is winning and who ummm.....is not!

Congress could not possibly be any more disinterested. Bill's arent even brought to the floor for a vote for many, many years now. Why? Because nobody cares.

Oh.....almost forgot.....take a look at what % of electricity is provided by renewable energy in 2019 . Dont be sipping on any kind of liquid beverage when you do though. Might choke your own ass!

 

[skookerasbil]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/04/22/unreliable-nature-of-solar-and-wind-makes-electricity-much-more-expensive-major-new-study-finds/

 

[skookerasbil]

https://renewablesnow.com/news/renewables-to-grow-fast-but-fossil-fuels-to-rule-till-2040-eia-projects-583589/

 

[westwall]

And then you have the geniuses, AOC and Gore......

But the dumber people are the deniers who reject the science because of what the wingut blogosphere misinterprets for them.

Because the smart ones want to waste trillions to reduce global temps in 2080 by 0.1 degrees. DURR.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that. Hey, wait a minute...youre not just trolling...you're actually stupid enough to believe that stuff. Ha, i have been overestimating you.

Exactly, denier exaggerations and lies just like that.

I agree, the actual reduction will be less than 0.1 degrees.

So what? I dont turn to ignorant deniers and trolls for opinions on science. But, good job using your words, son. *pats the toddinator's head

Weeeelllll, you are a troll, so yeah, you do.

More and more you sound like your banned former self.

 

[Blackrook]

I didn't know science was determined by opinion polls.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I didn't know science was determined by opinion polls.

75/77 "climate scientists" decided it was.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Have you ever taken a statistics class?

Sample Size: How Many Survey Participants Do I Need?

Yeah, clearly more than you,...

Determining the veracity of a parameter or hypothesis as it applies to a large population can be impractical or impossible for a number of reasons, so it's common to determine it for a smaller group, called a sample. A sample size that is too small reduces the power of the study and increases the margin of error, which can render the study meaningless. Researchers may be compelled to limit the sampling size for economic and other reasons. To ensure meaningful results, they usually adjust sample size based on the required confidence level and margin of error, as well as on the expected deviation among individual results.

Small Sample Size Decreases Statistical Power
The power of a study is its ability to detect an effect when there is one to be detected. This depends on the size of the effect because large effects are easier to notice and increase the power of the study.

The power of the study is also a gauge of its ability to avoid Type II errors. A Type II error occurs when the results confirm the hypothesis on which the study was based when, in fact, an alternative hypothesis is true. A sample size that is too small increases the likelihood of a Type II error skewing the results, which decreases the power of the study.


The Effects of a Small Sample Size Limitation

Do you think 751 is a small sample size? Do you disagree that the margin of error is 4% or less?

Yes, 751 is a very small sample size. Especially when you are trying to measure public opinion about such a contentious subject.

Do you agree or disagree that the margin of error is 4% or less?

I am sure that that is what they calculated. But 751 is a very small sample size for such a serious issue.

It also suffers from being a SINGLE issue poll, thus misleading results are easy to promote.

Now if they asked an open ended question, which allows many other concerns to be considered, global warming/climate change would rapidly plummet to the bottom of such polls, showing that only a few people really worry about climate change.

Here is but one of a few honest pollings with MULTIPLE and Topical questions:

New Gallup Poll: Americans do not even mention global warming as a problem – 36 ‘problems’ cited, but not climate

LINK

Single issue polls tends to be misleading.

 

[abu afak]

More evidence that warmists can't think rationally since your polls are a SINGLE issue polling, while my polls I posted allows multiple issues in their polls, which pushed climate change/global warming concerns near or at the bottom of the polling lists....

Uh, um, duh...
It IS fair to have a single issue Poll about.. a single issue....
In the "single issue" environment/climate section.

One doesn't have to rank it with one's immediate health, or ability to pay one's mortgage, to make it a Valid Concern.

This from someone who regularly/Obtusely posts Weather/cold spells as debate against warming (at all!).

`

 

[Sunsettommy]

More evidence that warmists can't think rationally since your polls are a SINGLE issue polling, while my polls I posted allows multiple issues in their polls, which pushed climate change/global warming concerns near or at the bottom of the polling lists....

Uh, um, duh...
It IS fair to have a single issue Poll about.. a single issue....
In the environment/climate section.

One doesn't have to rank it with one's immediate health, or ability to pay one's mortgage, to make it a Valid Concern.

This from someone who regularly/Obtusely posts Weather/cold spells as debate against warming (at all!).

`

Ha ha, it is clear you have no idea what I am talking about, and that I repeatedly showed that when there are MULTIPLE concerns allowed in the poll, the global warming/climate change concern drops to the BOTTOM section of such polls. Go read them little boy, only a few people in the polls I posted are concerned over it.

This is so simple that even cave men are smarter than you.....