Poll: Real scientists FAKING the data!!!

Discussion in 'Environment' started by skookerasbil, Aug 4, 2011.

  1. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,144
    Thanks Received:
    2,909
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,174
    69% Say It’s Likely Scientists Have Falsified Global Warming Research
    Wednesday, August 03, 2011

    The debate over global warming has intensified in recent weeks after a new NASA study was interpreted by skeptics to reveal that global warming is not man-made. While a majority of Americans nationwide continue to acknowledge significant disagreement about global warming in the scientific community, most go even further to say some scientists falsify data to support their own beliefs.

    The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of American Adults shows that 69% say it’s at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data in order to support their own theories and beliefs, including 40% who say this is Very Likely. Twenty-two percent (22%) don’t think it’s likely some scientists have falsified global warming data, including just six percent (6%) say it’s Not At All Likely. Another 10% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here .)

    69% Say It







    It just keeps getting better and better. A super-majority of Americans thnk the "real scientists" fake the data in an effort to suppor their own beliefs! 69%....:eek::eek::eek:








    not winning



    pardon the typos'..........I must admit, when I see further a further crash and burn of the alarmist k00k agenda's, the level of excitment will occassionally cause me some motor fcukk ups.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2011
  2. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,144
    Thanks Received:
    2,909
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,174
    [​IMG]
     
  3. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,144
    Thanks Received:
    2,909
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,174
    [​IMG]
     
  4. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,541
    Thanks Received:
    2,554
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,659
    I guess the skeptics don't have real scientists, right? Otherwise, why wouldn't it be the skeptical scientists that the public believes to be falsifying data? For example, the way the skeptics grossly misinterpreted the recent NASA study "in an effort to support their own beliefs"!!! :cool:
     
  5. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    I guess the hoaxers don't have any independently verifiable data. Otherwise, all of these scandals wouldn't be coming out of the woodwork, since the Hadley e-mail and source code dump.

    The wheels are coming off! :lol:
     
  6. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,391
    Thanks Received:
    5,402
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,264
    So, all the scientists worldwide, from the various political systems are all faking their data. And when people go on an ship tour up the Alaska coast, the scientists go ahead of them and chop off the ends of the glaciers that have receded greatly in historical times, right? Same for the glaciers in the mountains.

    Now everybody, make sure that you have your tinfoil hats on, no way would we want to allow rational thought to pollute your little brains.
     
  7. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,541
    Thanks Received:
    2,554
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,659
    I agree. How long can they keep the Global Cooling hoax going, when all they're doing is misinterpreting the data of real scientists? What's more scandalous than stealing someone's private communications and then fabricating self-serving interpretations of what they meant? Look at what happened afterwards. The scientists were exonerated, but the Global Cooling hoaxers merrily go along, as if nothing had happened despite being complicit after the fact in what is really a crime. Just shows you how concentrated money and willing lemmings can keep a doomed cause going.
     
  8. wirebender
    Offline

    wirebender Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,723
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    NC
    Ratings:
    +120
    Not all. Most simply work from the assumption that the fakers haven't actually faked thier data and wrongly assume it is correct. Any scientist who begins with the assumption that there is anything such as a greenhouse effect, or that the models representing earth are accurate are wrong at their foundations and any work built on those assumptions, no matter how honest the scientist is is going to be wrong.
     
  9. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,541
    Thanks Received:
    2,554
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,659
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  10. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,299
    Thanks Received:
    5,692
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,758
    You can laugh, but that doesn't change the fact that he's right.

    How many climate researchers do their own independent work from the ground up? How many don't use data and models from others?

    It's all built on a house of cards. And it's crumbling right in front of you.
     

Share This Page