POLL: Do you believe ACA mandates are Unconstitutional? Yes, No, or Both?

Discussion in 'Judicial Interpretation' started by emilynghiem, Aug 11, 2017.

?

ACA Mandates - Unconstitutional? Yes, No, Both or Other?

Poll closed Nov 9, 2017.
  1. Yes - the violate established Constitutional principles and process

    50.0%
  2. Yes - they violate Constitutional BELIEFS of others, whether or not we agree

    25.0%
  3. No - the process through Congress and Courts made it Constitutional

    37.5%
  4. Yes and No - It depends on your political beliefs which cannot be dictated by govt

    12.5%
  5. Other - Please Elaborate, Educate, and Enlighten us with your Explanation!

    12.5%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    19,733
    Thanks Received:
    2,734
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,149
    This OP brings up TWO different questions of (a) whether the ACA mandates were Unconstitutional by the literal Constitution and process; (b) they violated Constitutional BELIEFS, and if "political beliefs" count under "religious freedom" protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and Civil Rights principles against discrimination by creed.

    Do you believe the ACA Mandates were/are Unconstitutional?

    A. Yes, by violating Constitutional principles or process* that ARE established laws

    B. Yes, by violating Constitutional BELIEFS on principles or process* (ie even if people do not AGREE those BELIEFS are established Constitutional laws)

    * including arguments against govt regulating religious freedom, prohibiting or establishing beliefs through federal govt, rights of people and states, requirement of Constitutional Amendment, no taxation without representation, no involuntary servitude, no depriving liberties without due process of laws, equal protection of laws from discrimination by creed, consent of the governed, civil liberties or freedom of choice, etc.

    C. No, once a law is passed by Congress and upheld by Courts it is Constitutional

    D. Yes and No, it is Constitutional for those who believe it is, and Unconstitutional for those who believe it is not; thus if this distinction is not recognized and the mandates made optional for those who don't believe they are Constitutional, then that enforcement imposes on people against their beliefs, which is discriminatory and Unconstitutional

    E. Other Brilliant Answer - Please Elaborate, Educate and Enlighten us!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. ScienceRocks
    Offline

    ScienceRocks Democrat all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    59,458
    Thanks Received:
    6,694
    Trophy Points:
    1,900
    Location:
    The Good insane United states of America
    Ratings:
    +26,430
    There's no question it is constitutional.

    The freaking heritage foundation were the ones that developed the damn thing in the first place.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. MarathonMike
    Offline

    MarathonMike Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,265
    Thanks Received:
    2,820
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    The Southwestern Desert
    Ratings:
    +16,455
    Please provide the Constitutional justification for mandating health insurance. I've read the Constitution but I guess I missed the section on levying taxes on citizens to punish citizens for opting out of healthcare.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    19,733
    Thanks Received:
    2,734
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,149
    Dear ScienceRocks
    1. the plan you refer to covered insurance for CATASTROPHIC cases only NOT DAILY CARE AND NOT DICTATING TERMS OF INSURANCE AND PAYMENTS

    2. No such plan was EVER passed or voted YES on by Conservatives BECAUSE it Violates CONSERVATIVE Constitutional beliefs in states rights, individual liberties, and limited federal govt

    3. I take it you believe in choice C that it is constitutional because it passed through the process as required by Congress and Courts. But the arguments remain that the CONTENTS of the mandates, in themselves, are Unconstitutional and should NOT have been passed, approved or enforced by ANY branch of federal govt.

    Do you agree that you believe in C but others do not?
    you can believe they are wrong, but that doesn't change the belief the Supreme Court was wrong in ruling this as a constitutional tax. The Courts also ruled in favor of treating slaves as property under govt endorsed laws; and that was contested and later abolished.

    My argument is even though this law went through the process, the content violates beliefs and discriminates by religious affiliation and by creed. So the content of the REGULATIONS are unconstitutional, and establishing/enforcing them is discriminatory.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    19,733
    Thanks Received:
    2,734
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,149
    Dear MarathonMike the most I can understand, is the Constitutional "belief" in "promoting the general welfare" and in health care being a "compelling enough interest" to justify govt passing this law first, then reforming it later.
    Because liberals who believe in "right to health care" have the right to exercise their beliefs, somehow this got pushed through govt as "the only way" to guarantee protection and expression of that belief.

    I disagree, and would equally defend the right of individuals not to be deprived of our equal liberties without "due process of law' to PROVE who was obstructing the beliefs of others in exercising their right to health care.

    I believe the liberals are EQUALLY at fault for obstructing "universal care" by the liberal media systemically REJECTING Christian prayer and practice, and CENSORING knowledge and research into spiritual healing, glycoscience therapy, and other natural methods that would reduce costs of medical treatment and make "universal care" affordable to more people and save more lives.

    If liberals want to fulfill universal care, the Democrats promising prison reform should lobby to redirect those state resources toward sustainable medical programs, turning facilities into schools for training and providing services to the public for the same cost and resources currently spent on the prison population alone due to corruption and waste on failed systems.

    So issuing "insurance mandates" is NOT the "only way" and does not justify a "compelling interest" by govt. That argument was completely FAITH BASED and violated equal beliefs of other citizens opposed.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    11,529
    Thanks Received:
    3,678
    Trophy Points:
    350
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +7,049
  7. BlackFlag
    Online

    BlackFlag I haz hoisted it!

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2014
    Messages:
    11,706
    Thanks Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    3 sheets to the wind, so to speak
    Ratings:
    +7,772
    If you need healthcare to keep you alive, then you are not an asset to this Nation and should commit seppuku for the sake of the Republic. #MAGA
     
  8. deanrd
    Offline

    deanrd Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2017
    Messages:
    16,278
    Thanks Received:
    2,133
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +14,611
    I think Republicans wanting millions of Americans to die is treason. Plain and simple.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    19,733
    Thanks Received:
    2,734
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,149
    Dear deanrd that's like saying liberals who believe in freedom of choice want babies to die. The two are not synonymous, and neither is "wanting ppl to die" synonymous with wanting FREE CHOICE to develop OTHER WAYS of sustainable cost-effective health care instead of mandating it through govt.

    Can you really not see this?

    Do you want to take this to the bullring. Or do you agree this comparison is fair:
    liberal belief: right to health care
    conservative belief: right to life
    (So if one cannot be mandated through govt against the "free choice" of ppl who disagree with that belief, why mandate the other?)

    Right to life: freedom of choice not banned or penalized by govt
    Right to health care: civil liberty and free market choices not banned or penalized by govt.

    If free choice of abortion is different from wanting babies to die, isn't free market choice of health care ALSO different from wanting ppl to die?

    deanrd if you see something wrong with this analogy please correct me

    Otherwise we can take it to the bullring. Because frankly my dear, I'm growing tired of this one-sided bullshit.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2017
  10. C_Clayton_Jones
    Online

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    47,000
    Thanks Received:
    10,067
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +30,529
    There is no ‘individual mandate’ – no one is ‘mandated’ to buy health insurance; indeed, citizens are at liberty to go without health insurance if they so desire.

    As the Supreme Court explained when upholding the ACA as Constitutional: “…the shared responsibility payment may for constitutional purposes be considered a tax. The payment is not so high that there is really no choice but to buy health insurance; the payment is not limited to willful violations, as penalties for unlawful acts often are; and the payment is collected solely by the IRS through the normal means of taxation.”

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-393c3a2.pdf

    The ACA affords citizens the freedom to decide to buy health insurance or not.

    Consequently, the ACA is as a fact of law Constitutional, regardless of one’s subjective, wrongheaded opinion to the contrary.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1

Share This Page