Perry Porn? Who Cares! These are more Legitimate Concerns...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by IndependntLogic, Aug 28, 2011.

  1. IndependntLogic
    Offline

    IndependntLogic Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,997
    Thanks Received:
    399
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +399
    "As of this moment, this legislation is a staggering $23 billion short of
    the funds needed to pay for the promised property tax cuts over the next
    five years.... These are conservative estimates."**
    - Texas Comptroller Carole Strayhorn, warning Gov. Rick Perry about his 2006
    tax reform proposal*


    IN HIS STATE OF THE STATE SPEECH in February, Rick Perry described the $27
    billion budget shortfall confronting the Texas Legislature.


    Now, the mainstream media and big government interest groups are doing their
    best to convince us that we're facing a budget Armageddon," Perry said.
    "Texans don't believe it and they shouldn't because it's not true."


    The $27 billion equaled 15 percent of the $182 billion biennial budget the
    Legislature had passed two years earlier. If not Armageddon, an apocalyptic
    loss of revenue in a low-tax state that provides bare-bones public services.


    Perry's statement was even more remarkable because most of the budget
    shortfall was a consequence of a business-tax bill he pushed through the
    Legislature in a special session five years earlier.


    With Perry running for president on a record of fiscal responsibility (and
    job creation, discussed later in this article), it's important to understand
    the consequences of his 2006 "business margins tax" - and to ask if the
    governor knew that the tax reform he proposed would undermine the state's
    budgets in the years that followed.


    First, some background. Texas is one of nine states with no income tax. It
    relies on property taxes to pay for public services - notably, to pay for
    public education, which consumes the lion's share of property taxes.


    Because there is no income tax, property taxes are high. In 2006, Perry
    called a special session to address property taxes. With no income tax,
    there are no easy fixes. Yet Perry found one. A business-margins tax he said
    would provide enough revenue to allow for reductions in property taxes.


    It was evident at the time that the new tax would not deliver what the
    governor promised. The state comptroller, Carole Strayhorn, had her staff
    run the numbers on Perry's tax-reform proposal.


    "In 2007," she wrote in a letter to Perry, "your plan is $3.4 billion short;
    in 2009, it is $5.4 billion short; in 2010 it is $4.9 billion short, and in
    2011 it is $5 billion short. These are conservative estimates."


    The comptroller warned that "no economic miracle will close the gap your
    plan creates. Even if every dollar of the current [2006] $8.2 billion
    surplus was poured into the plan, it would not cover the plan's cost for
    more than two years, 2007 and 2008. The gap is going to continue to grow
    year by year." The shortfall the bill created could only be closed by tax
    increases, the comptroller warned, "or massive cuts in essential public
    services - like public education."


    "It was not only Ms. Strayhorn's letter," Houston Democratic Rep. Scott
    Hochberg told me. "Every official document predicting the state's financial
    crisis at the time predicted exactly what happened."


    Hochberg, the Legislature's resident authority on public-education finance,
    also warned Perry that the tax bill he was promoting would not produce the
    revenue he promised.


    "I asked the governor about this in a small meeting amongst legislators,"
    Hochberg said. "His answer to me, I remember it as clear as day, was 'Scott,
    use your common sense. Don't you know that when we cut property taxes we
    will see such an economic boom that you will never even notice the drop in
    revenue?'"


    Perry's response to the Democratic legislator was candid - and newsworthy.
    Perry admitted that he knew that the tax reform he proposed would result in
    a "drop in revenue."


    Perry was not alone in that knowledge.


    Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst told San Antonio Express-News re-porter
    Garry Scharrer this past January that he, too, knew the new tax wouldn't
    deliver what it promised:


    "Dewhurst now says that he knew that revenue projections from the revised
    business franchise tax 'were inflated' and told Senate members in
    closed-door caucus meetings at the time that the business tax would not
    perform as advertised 'and that we were going to create a structural funding
    deficit in state government.' But Dewhurst said he also believed at the time
    that 'we would grow out of it by now.'"


    A state senator told me last month that Republican leaders in the Senate
    knew the tax they were supporting wouldn't provide adequate revenue, and the
    "grow out of it" trope was their answer to questions from skeptics.


    "They knew their projections were bullshit," the senator said. "When you
    questioned them about it, they'd say 'we'll grow out of it.'"


    That's the story. The state's Republican governor and lieutenant governor
    knowingly created a budget crisis.


    As the state's comptroller predicted, a surplus covered some of the
    2007-2008 budget shortfall. In 2009, Perry used $17 billion of President
    Obama's federal stimulus money to fill the funding gap for the following two
    years, and to cover a shortfall in the previous fiscal year's budget. (Perry
    angrily refused $555 billion in stimulus money designated for the extension
    of benefits to the unemployed, protesting that the federal dollars came with
    strings attached.)


    When the Legislature convened in January 2011, the federal stimulus money
    was spent, and the budget shortfall about which the comptroller warned Perry
    five years earlier had arrived.


    Public education took the biggest hit.


    I asked Hochberg about the $4 billion cut from the state's public education
    budget.


    He said the funding gap is larger: $4.3 billion on the basic "formulas,"
    which have always been funded. And "a billion-plus" ($1.4 billion) in
    "categorical funding" to public schools - funds for teacher incentives,
    school facilities, pre-kindergarten grants.


    Thus far, 12,000 teachers have been laid off. Add to that roughly 6,000
    state employees cashiered because of budget cuts, a figure that doesn't
    include university professors and other university employees who will lose
    their jobs because of the $1.2 billion cut from higher ed funding.


    Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals were cut, and the final four
    months of Medicaid payments in fiscal year 2012 were not funded.


    There was an alternative to the austerity budget the Texas Legislature
    passed in June. Democrats and some Republicans proposed tapping the state's
    Rainy Day Fund, funded by oil and gas taxes, to cover part of the shortfall.


    Perry, however, declared the $9.5 billion fund off limits. He ultimately
    acquiesced to demands from moderate Republicans and agreed to use $3.2
    billion to cover part of the current fiscal year's deficit. But nothing for
    the next biennium, when the state's public schools are short $5.7 billion.


    "The governor doesn't do anything on his own," Hochberg observed. "The
    governor was only able to do that because he had a large number of House
    members, particularly newly elected Tea Party House members, who were
    willing to say 'I'm not going to vote against the governor.'


    "But, clearly, he led the parade."


    When the Legislature convenes in 2013, it will face a shortfall of $10
    billion to $18 billion, plus the $4.8 billion in Medicaid expenses it failed
    to fund this year.


    *JOBS FOR SALE -* By now we all know what Rick Perry is selling. He
    collaborates with the private sector to create jobs and to attract jobs from
    other states. The Texas Enterprise Fund and the Emerging Technologies Fund,
    his creations, have had unprecedented success.


    It's not as simple as Perry would have you believe.


    The two big economic development funds Perry controls operate on a
    trickle-up economic theory. The state takes money from taxpayers and gives
    it to corporations to entice them to create new jobs.


    Yet corporations often fail to deliver, and the governor and his staff
    rewrite corporations' contracts to relax their job-creation requirements.


    Grants are often made to companies that would move into the state or expand
    their workforce without a taxpayer-funded incentive.


    The governor hands over millions of dollars to corporations whose executives
    have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaigns.


    And Rick Perry holds all the cards. The lieutenant governor and the speaker
    of the House have a vote on which corporations get public money. But as a
    state senator explained to me, neither of them has the staff to evaluate
    candidates for taxpayer funding.


    The same senator also said he would like to know how many times the speaker
    and lieutenant governor have said 'no' to Perry. There is no public record.
    The governor proposes and the governor disposes, in closed meetings.


    And these are scarce dollars. In a low-tax and low-services state, the
    zero-sum-game nature of the budgetary process is painfully evident. For
    example, the biggest pot of economic-development dollars, the Texas
    Enterprise Fund, was started in 2003 by drawing $285 million from the
    state's Rainy Day Fund. The same Rainy Day Fund the governor this year
    declared off limits for the public schools.


    The Enterprise Fund also withdrew $161 million from the Unemployment
    Compensation Trust Fund in 2009, at a time when unemployment taxes paid by
    businesses tripled and only 34 percent of unemployed workers received
    benefits.


    Add to that the total funds appropriated by the Legislature, and you get
    close to $500 million, all of which has or will be disbursed by the
    governor.


    Perry has been in office for more than 10 years, which has allowed him to
    use his authority to make political appointments to expand the
    constitutionally limited powers of his office. He is, in other words, a very
    strong weak governor.


    Every statewide elected office is held by a Republican. And the Republican
    Party holds a supermajority in both houses of the Legislature.


    This political hegemony has created a climate that discourages oversight of
    the Republican governor.


    *PUBLIC INTEREST OVERSIGHT -* In the absence of official oversight, a
    good-government group, Texans for Public Justice (TPJ)<http://info.tpj.org/reports/pdf/perryprimer.fin.pdf>,
    did its own audit of the economic development funds and found that in 2009
    the number of corporate grant recipients not fulfilling their obligations
    had increased from 42 percent to 66 percent.


    TPJ also found that when companies failed to meet their contractual
    obligations to provide jobs, the governor's office discreetly rewrote their
    contracts.


    No state official, appointed or elected, it seemed, was working to ensure
    that the taxpayer was getting a reasonable return on the $368 billion the
    governor had handed out at the time TPJ's report was released.


    Beyond the sloppy stewardship of taxpayer dollars, many of Perry's grants
    make little sense.


    Consider $600,000 paid to the Cabela's sporting-goods chain for a commitment
    of 400 new jobs in two new superstores. And the promise of "new hotels,
    entertainment parks, restaurants and complementary retail stores … expected
    to total over $250 million and create an additional 2,000 Texas jobs,"
    according to documents obtained by TPJ.


    Cabela's is not Disney. It created 241 jobs, with average annual salaries of
    $23,000. The hotels, restaurants, and various retail outlets never
    materialized. The state recovered $177,288, or 44 percent of the grant.


    "It's a slippery slope when you fund retail," said Don Baylor, a policy
    analyst at the non-profit Center for Public Policy Priorities. "Because
    retail always follows where rooftops are." In other words, where there are
    consumers, Cabela's and other retailers need no incentive.


    Other grants were made to corporations expanding facilities they are
    unlikely to abandon.


    Motiva Enterprises, for example, is a joint venture of Shell Oil and the
    Saudi-Arabian oil company Aramco. In 2006, Texas awarded Motiva $2 million
    on the promise of 300 jobs it would create through a $3.2 billion project to
    make its Port Arthur refinery the largest in the nation.


    With a producing refinery on Port Arthur's Sabine-Neches Waterway, Motiva
    was unlikely to take its $3.2 billion expansion project to another state.


    Nor was Motiva so illiquid that it could not have expanded its refinery
    without $2 million from the public treasury. In the quarter in which
    Motiva's $2 million check was cut, Shell reported $6.3 billion in earnings.


    Taxpayers in Texas also wrote checks to mortgage bankers, while the bankers
    booked huge profits on the subprime home-loans that foundered the economy in
    2007.


    Countrywide Home Loans got $20 million in 2004, on a commitment of 7,500
    jobs. It created 3,876. Then the bottom fell out of the housing market,
    Countrywide was charged with defrauding its clients, and was acquired by
    Bank of America. It has agreed to return 40 percent of its $20 million. By
    July 2011, the Countrywide loan portfolio, underwritten in part by Texas
    taxpayers, had cost Bank of America more than 50 percent of its share value.


    Texas taxpayers also gave Washington Mutual $15 million in 2005, to open a
    new $50 million facility in San Antonio. At the time the deal was announced,
    WaMu had $300 billion in assets, $188 billion in deposits, and 43,000
    employees. It was also in the process of dumping its 30-year-fixed-rate
    mortgage portfolio to clear the books for high-risk subprime loans.


    "Those were really negative investments," Baylor said. "You financed toxic
    financial products that sucked equity and wealth out of hundreds of
    thousands of people, not only in Texas, but nationwide."


    WaMu also consistently missed its job targets. TPJ found that the governor's
    office amended its contract, allowing aggregated part-time jobs to count as
    full-time jobs.


    Other grants fail to pass the smell test.


    Bill White, Perry's opponent in the 2010 general election, criticized an
    $8.5 million grant to Caterpillar Inc. to build an engine plant in Seguin.
    Perry's office responded that White was desperate because he was trailing in
    the polls.


    Perhaps.


    But Peter M. Holt owns the Caterpillar sales outlets in Texas and had
    donated $424,000 to Perry's campaigns. The decision to locate the plant in
    Texas, according to a company press release obtained by White, was made
    before Caterpillar's grant was awarded.


    Sanderson Farms got $500,000 in exchange for a commitment to build a $7
    million chicken hatchery and processing plant in Waco. Sanderson Farms CEO
    Joe Sanderson had contributed $165,000 to Perry's campaign.


    Close ties between political donors and development grants are not isolated
    incidents. Texas Observer<http://www.texasobserver.org/cover-story/slush-fun>Editor Dave Mann found that executives and employees of 20 companies that
    received a combined $174.2 million had donated $2.2 million to Perry, and to
    the Republican Governors Association he chaired until he began his run for
    the presidency.


    In the 2011 legislative session, Democratic Senator Kirk Watson and
    Republican Senator John Carona passed a bill that provides some transparency
    in the grant process. Control of the funds remains firmly in Perry's hands.


    Don't look for the pace of the grants to slow. A week before Perry flew to
    South Carolina to announce that he's in the race, his office announced a
    $300,000 grant to Office Depot.


    The company might need the help. Two days before winning the scratch-off
    lottery in Texas, Office Depot posted a quarterly loss of $29 million.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Google
    Offline

    Google Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,781
    Thanks Received:
    458
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +812
    I simply love how liberals like yourself, despite your moderate name and signature quotes, are so concerned about deficits and debt when describing Perry.

    If these things are truly of concern to you, you must really be concerned and dismayed at the policies of the Obama administration.
     
  3. iamwhatiseem
    Offline

    iamwhatiseem Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    14,833
    Thanks Received:
    3,114
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +6,128
    Exactly...Kennedy was a whore, Clinton chased more tail than a winter wolf...Harding had as many prostitutes as he had socks.
    Our country is falling apart at the seams...who gives a flying doughnut if he liked porn
     
  4. McDowell's
    Offline

    McDowell's BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    883
    Thanks Received:
    239
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +239
    quoted for brevity
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Google
    Offline

    Google Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,781
    Thanks Received:
    458
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +812
    Copy and paste.....you should consider changing your name to DependentLogic!!!!! LOL
     
  6. IndependntLogic
    Offline

    IndependntLogic Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,997
    Thanks Received:
    399
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +399
    Um yeah. See my signature for your post here and I would imagine, elsewhere.

    Ya see, unlike those who stare at the spinning circle and see only what their party tells them to, I can point out dozens of threads where I have indeed, harshly criticized Obama's policies, lack of leadership, the debacle of ObamaCare, non-existence of any Dem budget etc...
    But of course, the weak whackjob types must do what, when anyone disagrees with them on anything? Address the points or facts in the OP? Of course not! See signature for your reply to this. SO predictible.... So please continue the entertainment! Keep proving me right! Dodge, Label, Insult, Change the Subject, Cut & Run but don't you try to address those darn facts and issues head on sweetheart!
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2011
  7. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    And we liberals find in amazingly interesting that the 2 biggest spending Presidents, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush got a "Deficits don't matter" mantra from conservatives when they were spending like crazy.

    :lol:
     

Share This Page