Gunny
Gold Member
guilt of crimes in america is never presumed until proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt.
I am neither the US Constitution, nor am I the judiciary branch of the government at any level. His guilt in several various endeavors is quite well-documented. That he has not been prosecuted for them is irrelevant.
While you can again attempt to stand on legal technicality, we BOTH know that presumed innocence line is bull. I have to go no further than just about every "Bush lied" thread on this board to prove it.
Now, my point is made. I had and have no intention of getting into the Clinton's evil nutroll anymore than I ever want to the Bush is evil nutroll. He did what he did, legal conviction or no. I stated then as I do now I don't think it was worth the money spent on it, nor do I think it was worth redirecting the Whitewater investigation.
If it is your desire to defend from a Clinton-hater/basher, you are misdirecting fire. I agreed with him on some issues and not others, the same as I do Bush ... the same as I have every President of the US, with the exception of Carter. HIM I'll bash.