Pelosi A Dangerous Woman??

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Bonnie, Jan 6, 2006.

  1. Bonnie
    Offline

    Bonnie Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,476
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Wherever
    Ratings:
    +669
    Parsing Pelosi
    January 6th, 2006



    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5131
     
  2. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,568
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,206
    Most dumb people are dangerous in positions of power.
     
  3. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    Indeed, just look at who occupies the Oval Office.
     
  4. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,568
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,206
    Clintons been out of office for a while.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    Ahhh yes...Blame Clinton. How sadly typical of you. What does Dubbyuh have to do to inspire your approbation...? Strangle a girl scout on the White House lawn? But your reaction to that would likely be "She deserved it!" :rolleyes:
     
  6. rtwngAvngr
    Offline

    rtwngAvngr Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    15,755
    Thanks Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +511
    You're such a bitter loser.
     
  7. Nightwish
    Offline

    Nightwish Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    211
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    St. Louis
    Ratings:
    +6
    Bush isn't dumb. He's not terribly bright, but he isn't dumb. His problem is not his intelligence, it's his spine. He's weak, and easily led by the strings by the neocons surrounding him. It's been a long time since the President actually controlled the White House.

    As far as Nancy Pelosi, she's a fool. She found herself in a position of power, and has gone overboard to try to go on the attack, without an army at her back. She's turned herself into a female Howard Dean -- in short, a joke.
     
  8. rtwngAvngr
    Offline

    rtwngAvngr Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    15,755
    Thanks Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +511
    What is the neocon agenda, besides american strength and active global leadership going forward? ANd why do you have a problem with it?
     
  9. Nightwish
    Offline

    Nightwish Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    211
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    St. Louis
    Ratings:
    +6
    They're reckless. They are more concerned with presenting a strong military image of the US upon the face of the rest of the world than they are with our actual security. They want war. They say exactly as much a .pdf document at the PNAC website. I don't feel like looking it up at the moment, but one of their stated plans is to test our military strengths and strategies by encouraging US engagement in no less than four full-scale foreign theaters of war in the near future. They're basically trying to become the NWO (not the wrestlers), shrouded in an American flag, and they aren't encouraging war for the sake of spreading democracy, they're encouraging it for the sake of showing the world we're in charge. They're Globalists wearing a thin disguise of Nationalism, which is probably why you've been hoodwinked into liking them.
     
  10. rtwngAvngr
    Offline

    rtwngAvngr Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    15,755
    Thanks Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +511
    No. They're willing to protect america. And willing to ignore idiotic ideas from the UN. They want to be global leaders, not global tyrants. But thanks for answering, that's better than most would do. Thanks for that, seriously. So many come here, shout some nonsense, and scamper away. Thanks for having some depth.
     

Share This Page