Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a fucking loon you are.
I can't help it if you are just stupid, so mired in democrat talking points that facts cannot penetrate,
A man gives his first time date a little pill. After a few minutes he says "Do you want to have sex?" The woman says yes, she's so drugged she'll say anything. Just to be sure and as a hedge against some future punishment, he turns on a recorder and a video tape. "Do you want to have sex with me?" Again she mumbles yes. He has concrete proof that the sex was consensual. She agreed on tape, it was filmed.
It was still forcible rape.
Wow,,, I agree with you! and is very true.
I can't help it if you are just stupid, so mired in democrat talking points that facts cannot penetrate,
A man gives his first time date a little pill. After a few minutes he says "Do you want to have sex?" The woman says yes, she's so drugged she'll say anything. Just to be sure and as a hedge against some future punishment, he turns on a recorder and a video tape. "Do you want to have sex with me?" Again she mumbles yes. He has concrete proof that the sex was consensual. She agreed on tape, it was filmed.
It was still forcible rape.
Wow,,, I agree with you! and is very true.
You can't consent to something if you aren't in your right mind. It can't be forcible and consensual at the same time.
Idiotic thinking like this justifies pedophilia.
No, actually he claimed that it was both consensual and forcible.Wow,,, I agree with you! and is very true.
You can't consent to something if you aren't in your right mind. It can't be forcible and consensual at the same time.
Idiotic thinking like this justifies pedophilia.
you're not very bright, are you. Katz is not claiming it is actually consensual, but that the guy can CLAIM it was consensual.
He's in Minneapolis. Wait, maybe I shouldn't tell someone that has a vendetta against the government....Anyone seen Joe Biden?
No, actually he claimed that it was both consensual and forcible.You can't consent to something if you aren't in your right mind. It can't be forcible and consensual at the same time.
Idiotic thinking like this justifies pedophilia.
you're not very bright, are you. Katz is not claiming it is actually consensual, but that the guy can CLAIM it was consensual.
did you miss this?No, actually he claimed that it was both consensual and forcible.you're not very bright, are you. Katz is not claiming it is actually consensual, but that the guy can CLAIM it was consensual.
Katz, correct me if I am wrong, but was your intent behind the a fore mentioned post to show that because he had 'consent' on tape, he could CLAIM it was consensual, even though the fact she was drugged made it rape and in actual fact, NOT consensual?
Forcible rape can include consensual sex, that's why it's hard to quantify.
did you miss this?No, actually he claimed that it was both consensual and forcible.
Katz, correct me if I am wrong, but was your intent behind the a fore mentioned post to show that because he had 'consent' on tape, he could CLAIM it was consensual, even though the fact she was drugged made it rape and in actual fact, NOT consensual?
Forcible rape can include consensual sex, that's why it's hard to quantify.
Of course, he's free to now backtrack if he wishes.
The Republican platform opposes abortions in any instance, including rape (Forcible or otherwise).
Why would we expect to the party's candidate for VP to disagree?
Grovelling pos rep is called fordid you miss this?Katz, correct me if I am wrong, but was your intent behind the a fore mentioned post to show that because he had 'consent' on tape, he could CLAIM it was consensual, even though the fact she was drugged made it rape and in actual fact, NOT consensual?
Forcible rape can include consensual sex, that's why it's hard to quantify.
Of course, he's free to now backtrack if he wishes.
actually, yes, I missed that. It does seem to be at odds with what I thought his meaning was.
Katz??
It was in 2008 and it will be voted on again next week at the convention (unless the wrath of God, through Isaac, blows the convention away).The Republican platform opposes abortions in any instance, including rape (Forcible or otherwise).
Why would we expect to the party's candidate for VP to disagree?
thats actually a lie but you already knows this....Many republicans like me do believe abortion is murder but it is not the party platform.....
Grovelling pos rep is called fordid you miss this?
Of course, he's free to now backtrack if he wishes.
actually, yes, I missed that. It does seem to be at odds with what I thought his meaning was.
Katz??
The bill he and Akin co-sponsored would have limited federal funding for abortion coverage to only “forcible rape” — language that was removed from the bill after an uproar from women’s rights activists. Though he has since apologized for using the term “legitimate rape,” Akin’s wording was seemingly a nod to the notion of “forcible rape” being the only kind of rape worthy of protections.
“Rape is rape. Rape is rape, period. End of story,” Ryan said when asked about the idea of “forcible rape” — language that existed in the bill Ryan supported.
Pressed on what Ryan meant when he co-sponsored the bill, Ryan repeated himself: “Rape is rape, and there’s no splitting hairs over rape.”
Paul Ryan Stands By His Abortion Record | TPM2012