B
bamthin
Guest
Originally posted by jimnyc
You mean to tell me the president had officials look into military options against a country that we have had problems with for 9 years at the time? Tell me it isn't so, what an illogical thing to do.
As opposed to claiming to have documents of proof? Speaking of which, you haven't answered me yet - why haven't these documents been released? When will they be released? Wouldn't that make sense to avoid all the confusion? I'm wondering why he hasn't done so yet.
You seem to be missing the main point here by focusing on the details. Two people have come out that were on Bush's National Security Council and said that Bush was developing plans for a ground invasion of Iraq BEFORE 9/11. This was in stark contrast to the Clinton strategy of regime change through other means like perhaps, organizing a coup, etc.
If all this is true, then it becomes much more reasonable to assume that Bush, in his agenda to actually invade Iraq, would mislead the American public to meet his desires. This also brings into question the possibility that Bush would use the unfortunate events surrounding 9/11, to serve his ulterior motive to launch a ground invasion of Iraq by misleading the American public to beleive the two were connected.
As each day goes by, there is more evidence to support this theory and substantially less to refute it. Perhaps you need to look a little closer at the situation as a whole and try and put your political biases aside. If Clinton did this, would you be OK with it? I know I wouldn't. I don't like being misled or lied to in a matter that has cost so many young Americans their lives.
-Bam