I give props where props are due. I disagree with his decision, but I bet the Republican congress does nothing of significance. They have proven themselves to be too chicken shit.
What would you suggest the Republican Congress do, jerkoff?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I give props where props are due. I disagree with his decision, but I bet the Republican congress does nothing of significance. They have proven themselves to be too chicken shit.
Don't include me in your royal WE. I did not vote for any of these jerks.I blame America. WE (collectively speaking) put that uninformed dip-shit into the position of President.
And WE (collectively speaking) failed to provide him with an opposition Congress in large enough numbers to override his petulant petty little vetoes.
But his veto does tend to serve well to corroborate Rudy's observation. Obumbler doesn't much care for America.
Sorry but we the people have no power or say in our government. It is controlled by powerful interests.Don't include me in your royal WE. I did not vote for any of these jerks.I blame America. WE (collectively speaking) put that uninformed dip-shit into the position of President.
And WE (collectively speaking) failed to provide him with an opposition Congress in large enough numbers to override his petulant petty little vetoes.
But his veto does tend to serve well to corroborate Rudy's observation. Obumbler doesn't much care for America.
I didn't vote for the fucking Obumbler and liberal/socialist Democrap Party machine hacks, either. But WE THE PEOPLE sure did vote, and those guys won. The rest of us failed to provide a meaningful candidate to oppose Obumbler. By our own actions and inaction, we permitted those crap holes of the liberal lemming left to prevail. WE are paying for that.
I give props where props are due. I disagree with his decision, but I bet the Republican congress does nothing of significance. They have proven themselves to be too chicken shit.
What would you suggest the Republican Congress do, jerkoff?
I'm not surprised. Give him props though, he did do what he said he was going to do. Now, it's up to the Republican Congress to bombard him with this bill until something gives.
I give props where props are due. I disagree with his decision, but I bet the Republican congress does nothing of significance. They have proven themselves to be too chicken shit.
I give props where props are due. I disagree with his decision, but I bet the Republican congress does nothing of significance. They have proven themselves to be too chicken shit.
What would you suggest the Republican Congress do, jerkoff?
It doesnt matter how strong or weak the argument is. Private companies are paying to have it done. It wont cost the gov anything and they will make money. The onus is on explaining why it is counter productive.The argument in favor of this pipeline is weak.
The attempt by nutters to label the Democrats as "the party of no" is even weaker.
We can count on our USMB nutters to disregard that fact and support whatever position opposes the POTUS. It results from being weak.
I didn't vote for the fucking Obumbler and liberal/socialist Democrap Party machine hacks, either. But WE THE PEOPLE sure did vote, and those guys won. The rest of us failed to provide a meaningful candidate to oppose Obumbler. By our own actions and inaction, we permitted those crap holes of the liberal lemming left to prevail. WE are paying for that.
It doesnt matter how strong or weak the argument is. Private companies are paying to have it done. It wont cost the gov anything and they will make money. The onus is on explaining why it is counter productive.The argument in favor of this pipeline is weak.
The attempt by nutters to label the Democrats as "the party of no" is even weaker.
We can count on our USMB nutters to disregard that fact and support whatever position opposes the POTUS. It results from being weak.
The Dims are assholes. But they are bold and consistent in DOING what they seek to accomplish.
The GOP are not as institutionally inclined to be assholes. But there's not much value in being "more" right-thinking than your opposition numbers if you are too fucking weak and flaccid to DO anything about it.
Thats why Dems lost. They have been preventing recovery for years.When your party makes preventing economic recovery the primary plank in its platform for 6 years.......you get this weak sauce. There are no "can do" people leading the nutters. No new ideas.
Go ahead. Because all the environmental studies done dont show any damage.It doesnt matter how strong or weak the argument is. Private companies are paying to have it done. It wont cost the gov anything and they will make money. The onus is on explaining why it is counter productive.The argument in favor of this pipeline is weak.
The attempt by nutters to label the Democrats as "the party of no" is even weaker.
We can count on our USMB nutters to disregard that fact and support whatever position opposes the POTUS. It results from being weak.
Who's explanation would you deem acceptable? I can give you a dozen.
The Dims are assholes. But they are bold and consistent in DOING what they seek to accomplish.
The GOP are not as institutionally inclined to be assholes. But there's not much value in being "more" right-thinking than your opposition numbers if you are too fucking weak and flaccid to DO anything about it.
Complete lack of awareness. It's freakish.
Go ahead. Because all the environmental studies done dont show any damage.It doesnt matter how strong or weak the argument is. Private companies are paying to have it done. It wont cost the gov anything and they will make money. The onus is on explaining why it is counter productive.The argument in favor of this pipeline is weak.
The attempt by nutters to label the Democrats as "the party of no" is even weaker.
We can count on our USMB nutters to disregard that fact and support whatever position opposes the POTUS. It results from being weak.
Who's explanation would you deem acceptable? I can give you a dozen.
So what's the argument for why gov't should prohibit it?
Maybe just to defend the rights of those landowners that don't want the pipeline through their properties?Go ahead. Because all the environmental studies done dont show any damage.It doesnt matter how strong or weak the argument is. Private companies are paying to have it done. It wont cost the gov anything and they will make money. The onus is on explaining why it is counter productive.The argument in favor of this pipeline is weak.
The attempt by nutters to label the Democrats as "the party of no" is even weaker.
We can count on our USMB nutters to disregard that fact and support whatever position opposes the POTUS. It results from being weak.
Who's explanation would you deem acceptable? I can give you a dozen.
So what's the argument for why gov't should prohibit it?