Overwhelming Majority Of Studies Find That Gun Control Policies Don’t Work

[OnePercenter]

There ya go folks, the people snowflakes trust are saying gun control won't work:

Studies: Gun Control Has Little Effect | The Daily Caller​

An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.

The non-profit RAND corporation spent two years and $1 million on the analysis, searching for evidence of benefit from gun control policies. RAND’s analysis looked to establish connections between gun policies and rates of homicide, suicide, self-defense gun use, hunting, and other categories. The vast majority of those categories went unaffected by legislation, however, according to NPR.

“Most of the effects that we were looking for evidence on, we didn’t find any evidence,” Andrew Morral, who lead the analysis.​

If anything, there will be more violence if the left has their way. Not only from criminals but eventually from the government when they gain full control over the people. It's happened every time in history and will happen again.

The battle cry of Clementine!;

 

[OnePercenter]

THe op is a lie . States wgbtough gun control do better than gun nut states in any gun stat you can think of .

So that must make Chicago the safest city in America... what happened?

Chicago isn’t a state .

So gun control doesn’t work at a city wide level and since you can’t argue that point you want a state listed. Fine, Illinois then. Chicago has more than enough crime for the entire state, several states actually.

Chicago is an outlier because of its gang problem .

There are plenty of other cities in liberal gun control states . But noooo . You won’t see gun nuts bringing up thier gun stats vs stats in gun nut state cities .

Baltimore? . . . . er, nope.
Detroit? . . . . . . er, nope.
Los Angeles? . . . . . er, nope.

What about where you live?

Toronto?
Calgary?
Quebec City?

 

[OnePercenter]

There ya go folks, the people snowflakes trust are saying gun control won't work:

Studies: Gun Control Has Little Effect | The Daily Caller​

An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.

The non-profit RAND corporation spent two years and $1 million on the analysis, searching for evidence of benefit from gun control policies. RAND’s analysis looked to establish connections between gun policies and rates of homicide, suicide, self-defense gun use, hunting, and other categories. The vast majority of those categories went unaffected by legislation, however, according to NPR.

“Most of the effects that we were looking for evidence on, we didn’t find any evidence,” Andrew Morral, who lead the analysis.​

The Liberal effort to ban guns has nothing to do with facts, evidence, reality-based results, etc...it's about 'Emotion' (which is why they ramp up their propaganda and PR efforts after tragedies, like school shootings) and disarming America...

...no more than Gore's 'Global Warming' pitch / predictions and simultaneous self-enriching 'Carbon Credit' scam had anything to do with actual science / actual results. (Way past Gore's prediction dates, cities that should be under water now, for example, are still NOT).

Nobody wants to ban handguns, hunting rifles, and shotguns. Quit spewing the NRA rant to sell more guns.

No cities were under water? How about cities in Louisiana, New Jersey, and the territories of Puerto Rico and the American Virgin Islands?

 

[Cecilie1200]

THe op is a lie . States wgbtough gun control do better than gun nut states in any gun stat you can think of .

Well, your blank assertion DEFINITELY beats his studies, just because YOU said it.

 

[Cecilie1200]

There ya go folks, the people snowflakes trust are saying gun control won't work:

Studies: Gun Control Has Little Effect | The Daily Caller​

An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.

The non-profit RAND corporation spent two years and $1 million on the analysis, searching for evidence of benefit from gun control policies. RAND’s analysis looked to establish connections between gun policies and rates of homicide, suicide, self-defense gun use, hunting, and other categories. The vast majority of those categories went unaffected by legislation, however, according to NPR.

“Most of the effects that we were looking for evidence on, we didn’t find any evidence,” Andrew Morral, who lead the analysis.​

The Liberal effort to ban guns has nothing to do with facts, evidence, reality-based results, etc...it's about 'Emotion' (which is why they ramp up their propaganda and PR efforts after tragedies, like school shootings) and disarming America...

...no more than Gore's 'Global Warming' pitch / predictions and simultaneous self-enriching 'Carbon Credit' scam had anything to do with actual science / actual results. (Way past Gore's prediction dates, cities that should be under water now, for example, are still NOT).

Nobody wants to ban handguns, hunting rifles, and shotguns. Quit spewing the NRA rant to sell more guns.

No cities were under water? How about cities in Louisiana, New Jersey, and the territories of Puerto Rico and the American Virgin Islands?

Quit pissing on our legs and trying to tell us it's raining. Just because you want to pretend your end game is different than it is doesn't require us to pretend we're as dumb as you.

 

[Timmy]

THe op is a lie . States wgbtough gun control do better than gun nut states in any gun stat you can think of .

Well, your blank assertion DEFINITELY beats his studies, just because YOU said it.

I’ll link to the wiki page that’s based on Fed stats.

But first you tell ME What kind of measure you want ? Cause I don’t want you moving goalposts .

 

[Timmy]

THe op is a lie . States wgbtough gun control do better than gun nut states in any gun stat you can think of .

So that must make Chicago the safest city in America... what happened?

Chicago isn’t a state .

So gun control doesn’t work at a city wide level and since you can’t argue that point you want a state listed. Fine, Illinois then. Chicago has more than enough crime for the entire state, several states actually.

Chicago is an outlier because of its gang problem .

There are plenty of other cities in liberal gun control states . But noooo . You won’t see gun nuts bringing up thier gun stats vs stats in gun nut state cities .

Baltimore? . . . . er, nope.
Detroit? . . . . . . er, nope.
Los Angeles? . . . . . er, nope.

Baltimore and Detriot have specific economic issues .

LA and Cali have good gun stats .

 

[bripat9643]

So that must make Chicago the safest city in America... what happened?

Chicago isn’t a state .

So gun control doesn’t work at a city wide level and since you can’t argue that point you want a state listed. Fine, Illinois then. Chicago has more than enough crime for the entire state, several states actually.

Chicago is an outlier because of its gang problem .

There are plenty of other cities in liberal gun control states . But noooo . You won’t see gun nuts bringing up thier gun stats vs stats in gun nut state cities .

Baltimore? . . . . er, nope.
Detroit? . . . . . . er, nope.
Los Angeles? . . . . . er, nope.

Baltimore and Detriot have specific economic issues .

LA and Cali have good gun stats .

Yeah, they have economic issues: Democerats run them.

 

[Timmy]

Chicago isn’t a state .

So gun control doesn’t work at a city wide level and since you can’t argue that point you want a state listed. Fine, Illinois then. Chicago has more than enough crime for the entire state, several states actually.

Chicago is an outlier because of its gang problem .

There are plenty of other cities in liberal gun control states . But noooo . You won’t see gun nuts bringing up thier gun stats vs stats in gun nut state cities .

Baltimore? . . . . er, nope.
Detroit? . . . . . . er, nope.
Los Angeles? . . . . . er, nope.

Baltimore and Detriot have specific economic issues .

LA and Cali have good gun stats .

Yeah, they have economic issues: Democerats run them.

Yeah democrats run the places that make all our money .

America’s unique gun violence problem, explained in 17 maps and charts


Check out map 5 and 8 . You see the gun deaths per state .

 

[OnePercenter]

There ya go folks, the people snowflakes trust are saying gun control won't work:

Studies: Gun Control Has Little Effect | The Daily Caller​

An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.

The non-profit RAND corporation spent two years and $1 million on the analysis, searching for evidence of benefit from gun control policies. RAND’s analysis looked to establish connections between gun policies and rates of homicide, suicide, self-defense gun use, hunting, and other categories. The vast majority of those categories went unaffected by legislation, however, according to NPR.

“Most of the effects that we were looking for evidence on, we didn’t find any evidence,” Andrew Morral, who lead the analysis.​

The Liberal effort to ban guns has nothing to do with facts, evidence, reality-based results, etc...it's about 'Emotion' (which is why they ramp up their propaganda and PR efforts after tragedies, like school shootings) and disarming America...

...no more than Gore's 'Global Warming' pitch / predictions and simultaneous self-enriching 'Carbon Credit' scam had anything to do with actual science / actual results. (Way past Gore's prediction dates, cities that should be under water now, for example, are still NOT).

Nobody wants to ban handguns, hunting rifles, and shotguns. Quit spewing the NRA rant to sell more guns.

No cities were under water? How about cities in Louisiana, New Jersey, and the territories of Puerto Rico and the American Virgin Islands?

Quit pissing on our legs and trying to tell us it's raining. Just because you want to pretend your end game is different than it is doesn't require us to pretend we're as dumb as you.

Your lack of refutation of my post with facts is very telling.

American workers don't make enough money is my end game.

 

[jon_berzerk]

There ya go folks, the people snowflakes trust are saying gun control won't work:

Studies: Gun Control Has Little Effect | The Daily Caller​

An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.

The non-profit RAND corporation spent two years and $1 million on the analysis, searching for evidence of benefit from gun control policies. RAND’s analysis looked to establish connections between gun policies and rates of homicide, suicide, self-defense gun use, hunting, and other categories. The vast majority of those categories went unaffected by legislation, however, according to NPR.

“Most of the effects that we were looking for evidence on, we didn’t find any evidence,” Andrew Morral, who lead the analysis.​

take this idea of raising the age to 21 to buy an ar

how many of the past shooters would that have stopped

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Gun control does not work.

Repeal all gun laws and arm everyone. The shootings will immediately stop.

 

[Reasonable]

Gun control does not work.

Repeal all gun laws and arm everyone. The shootings will immediately stop.

You’re completely out of your mind. A prerequisite for being a Trump supporter.

 

[ThisIsMe]

11 teens a day die in cell phone related accidents. 28 people a day die from alcohol related accidents.

So, we need to ban cell phones, alcohol, and vehicles.

 

[OnePercenter]

There ya go folks, the people snowflakes trust are saying gun control won't work:

Studies: Gun Control Has Little Effect | The Daily Caller​

An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.

The non-profit RAND corporation spent two years and $1 million on the analysis, searching for evidence of benefit from gun control policies. RAND’s analysis looked to establish connections between gun policies and rates of homicide, suicide, self-defense gun use, hunting, and other categories. The vast majority of those categories went unaffected by legislation, however, according to NPR.

“Most of the effects that we were looking for evidence on, we didn’t find any evidence,” Andrew Morral, who lead the analysis.​

take this idea of raising the age to 21 to buy an ar

how many of the past shooters would that have stopped

bripat is upset because

Getting an AR-15-style rifle is much harder in Canada than the U.S.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

There ya go folks, the people snowflakes trust are saying gun control won't work:

Studies: Gun Control Has Little Effect | The Daily Caller​

An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.

The non-profit RAND corporation spent two years and $1 million on the analysis, searching for evidence of benefit from gun control policies. RAND’s analysis looked to establish connections between gun policies and rates of homicide, suicide, self-defense gun use, hunting, and other categories. The vast majority of those categories went unaffected by legislation, however, according to NPR.

“Most of the effects that we were looking for evidence on, we didn’t find any evidence,” Andrew Morral, who lead the analysis.​

The United States has 270 million guns and had 90 mass shooters from 1966 to 2012.

No other country has more than 46 million guns or 18 mass shooters.

You jumped in without doing the math. Multiply their numbers times five and they match the ones we have exactly.

WTF?

Did you miss something? Actually I did. In your failed example of number of guns equal number of mass shooters where are the population numbers?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

So that must make Chicago the safest city in America... what happened?

Chicago isn’t a state .

So gun control doesn’t work at a city wide level and since you can’t argue that point you want a state listed. Fine, Illinois then. Chicago has more than enough crime for the entire state, several states actually.

Chicago is an outlier because of its gang problem .

There are plenty of other cities in liberal gun control states . But noooo . You won’t see gun nuts bringing up thier gun stats vs stats in gun nut state cities .

Baltimore? . . . . er, nope.
Detroit? . . . . . . er, nope.
Los Angeles? . . . . . er, nope.

Baltimore and Detriot have specific economic issues .

LA and Cali have good gun stats .

The fuck? LA is right behind Chicago in crime. WTF are you talking about?

 

[Darkwind]

THe op is a lie . States wgbtough gun control do better than gun nut states in any gun stat you can think of .

So that must make Chicago the safest city in America... what happened?

Chicago isn’t a state .

Chicago is the gold standard for gun control.

 

[OnePercenter]

11 teens a day die in cell phone related accidents. 28 people a day die from alcohol related accidents.

So, we need to ban cell phones, alcohol, and vehicles.

We need to ban cell phones and alcohol IN vehicles.

 

[hazlnut]

There ya go folks, the people snowflakes trust are saying gun control won't work:

Studies: Gun Control Has Little Effect | The Daily Caller​

An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.

The non-profit RAND corporation spent two years and $1 million on the analysis, searching for evidence of benefit from gun control policies. RAND’s analysis looked to establish connections between gun policies and rates of homicide, suicide, self-defense gun use, hunting, and other categories. The vast majority of those categories went unaffected by legislation, however, according to NPR.

“Most of the effects that we were looking for evidence on, we didn’t find any evidence,” Andrew Morral, who lead the analysis.​

Yes -- all the current policies don't work.

Thank you.

We agree.

So let's try something new.