Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I notice that no one is questioning that the methane loop exists, and is a massive threat to life on this planet.
Much better to argue about what some idiot blogger wrote than actually deal with the science, I guess.
I notice that no one is questioning that the methane loop exists, and is a massive threat to life on this planet.
Much better to argue about what some idiot blogger wrote than actually deal with the science, I guess.
OMG!!! Cow farts are going to kill us all. We should all become vegans. Soy beans don't fart hardly at all.
Does anybody know what causes weather?
Deniers have zero science that supports what they wish was true. Zero. Nothing.
They hope to accomplish their goal of more for them at the expense of future generations through the spread of ignorance. Not unlike the role of the Church that lead to Europe's Dark Ages.
Their strategy is to attack science and scientists to try to drag them down to the level of their politics and politicians.
In other words drag dirty politics to the world of truth seeking.
Nafarious at best.
Of course it's all for naught. They are trying to delay what's already launched.
There is just too much opportunity to contain the doers of the world.
The bottom line for their efforts is that the harder they work at it, the more irrelevant they make themselves. And if there's one thing that they can't afford to lose any more of its relevance.
They really seem unable to help themselves though. The ego thing. They want to seem educated and informed without investing in being educated and informed.
It's self destructive behavior.
Anybody know what happens to any volume of matter that takes in more heat energy than it can pass on?
Anybody know what defines a compound as a greenhouse gas?
Anybody know the products of combustion of fossil fuels?
Does anybody know what causes weather?
Does anybody know what causes weather?
Nope. None of us do. We have a relatively good basic understanding of what sort of weather certain atmospheric conditions cause, but we are in the dark when asked exactly what caused the atmospheric conditions that resulted in the weather.
Deniers have zero science that supports what they wish was true. Zero. Nothing.
The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.[1] To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.[2] The Oxford English Dictionary defines the scientific method as: "a method or procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."[3]
The chief characteristic which distinguishes the scientific method from other methods of acquiring knowledge is that scientists seek to let reality speak for itself,[discuss] supporting a theory when a theory's predictions are confirmed and challenging a theory when its predictions prove false. Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methods of obtaining knowledge. Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies to test these hypotheses via predictions which can be derived from them. These steps must be repeatable, to guard against mistake or confusion in any particular experimenter. Theories that encompass wider domains of inquiry may bind many independently derived hypotheses together in a coherent, supportive structure. Theories, in turn, may help form new hypotheses or place groups of hypotheses into context.
Scientific inquiry is generally intended to be as objective as possible in order to reduce biased interpretations of results. Another basic expectation is to document, archive and share all data and methodology so they are available for careful scrutiny by other scientists, giving them the opportunity to verify results by attempting to reproduce them. This practice, called full disclosure, also allows statistical measures of the reliability of these data to be established (when data is sampled or compared to chance).
There's a world of science to support AGW.
If you disagree, show me one piece of scientific evidence that supports that AGW is not real.
So you admit that weather cannot be reproduced in a lab, but demand that climate change must be reproduceable in a lab before you will take it seriously.
And you wonder why I question whether you believe your own posting?
I certainly don't expect anyone to reproduce weather in a lab. That isn't the issue though.
SSDD -
I certainly don't expect anyone to reproduce weather in a lab. That isn't the issue though.
Then stop posting this childish gibberish about climate change not being reproduced in a lab - it's as simple as that.
-- [As opposed to one of those non horrific catastrophes.] Id.Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012
* * * *
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 rose by a record amount over the past year. It is the third successive year in which they have increased sharply. Scientists are at a loss to explain why the rapid rise has taken place, but fear the trend could be the first sign of runaway global warming.
Runaway Global Warming promises to literally burn-up agricultural areas into dust worldwide by 2012, causing global famine, anarchy, diseases, and war on a global scale as military powers including the U.S., Russia, and China, fight for control of the Earth's remaining resources.
Over 4.5 billion people could die from Global Warming related causes by 2012, as planet Earth accelarates [sic] into a greed-driven horrific catastrophe.
SSDD -
I certainly don't expect anyone to reproduce weather in a lab. That isn't the issue though.
Then stop posting this childish gibberish about climate change not being reproduced in a lab - it's as simple as that.