Outgun them when you can’t disarm them

Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.

It's terrible that the NRA continues to push for the unfettered access of guns to every imbecile with an agenda. Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity. And unsatisfied with that bloodbath..the NRA continues to push for more absurd laws..like "Stand your ground". Hopefully..that was the bridge to far.

I’m proud of you! Not only are you a fool, but you have the energy to let everyone know it!

Time and again you are absolutely wrong, but totally certain!!


The down-side is when corrected, you continue to post the same erroneous opinion.


For example:

George Mason, Father of the Bill of Rights:"I ask, Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." (Jonathan Elliot, The Debates of the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, [NY: Burt Franklin,1888] p.425-6)

The Constitution gave Congress the power to raise and support a national army, and to organize “the Militia.” This is because an army didn’t naturally exist, while “the Militia” only had to be organized: it always existed. (See enumerated powers in Article 1,Section 8.)

The Supreme Court, in US v. Miller, (1939) “…militia system…implied the general obligation of all adult male inhabitants to possess arms, and, with certain exceptions, to cooperate in the work of defence.” It concluded that the militia was primarily civilians.

Today, federal law defines “the militia of the United States” to include all able-bodied males from 17 to 45 and members of the National Guard up to age 64, but excluding those who have no intention of becoming citizens, and active military personnel. (US Code Title 10, sect. 311-313)



You serve as the best of all proof of the following:
Not facts, nor data, nor experience, nor rational debate will convince Liberals.
 
All Second Amendment arguments aside, too many innocent Americans are killed by guns. The NRA and its minions have never addressed this issue and never will. The gun business is profitable and the hysteria "They'll take your guns" is nothing more than fear mongering by those whose sole fear is the loss of the golden goose.

My position is very simple, keep whatever weapon one needs IN their home. If they are too scared to leave home without it, they should stay home. The simple fact of having a firearm in one's custody and control is little different than someone under the influence of alcohol. Both make the actor 'brave' and more likely to engage another than if sober or unarmed.

I suspect Zimmerman is an example of what can go wrong when unvetted and poorly trained citizens are allowed to walk our streets armed with deadly weapons. He and others are more likely to put themselves in harms way, thinking a firearm will protect them can unwittingly create the situation where they or others are killed or wounded.

Ever notice, Wry, how the Liberals among us find it difficult to trust their fellow citizens?
 
The second amendment is nothing what you "gun righters" think it is. It is a prescribed method for maintaining a ground force..without having to have a professional army. There is no right to wild west justice, hunting, or anything else you guys imagine.
This is a lie.


This is a strawman, and a lie.

Some 40K citizens and LEOs die each year because of this insanity.
Another lie.

Clearly, the truth is not your friend.

Naw..it's the truth.

The lie is what you guys put out there on a daily basis.

The Continental Army was DISBANDED shortly after the revolution.

Got it?

Militia is not part of the army.

Got it?
 

Some people say “If you can’t beat them, join them”. I say “If you can’t beat them, beat them”, because they will be expecting you to join them, so you will have the element of surprise.
 
All Second Amendment arguments aside, too many innocent Americans are killed by guns. The NRA and its minions have never addressed this issue and never will. The gun business is profitable and the hysteria "They'll take your guns" is nothing more than fear mongering by those whose sole fear is the loss of the golden goose.

My position is very simple, keep whatever weapon one needs IN their home. If they are too scared to leave home without it, they should stay home. The simple fact of having a firearm in one's custody and control is little different than someone under the influence of alcohol. Both make the actor 'brave' and more likely to engage another than if sober or unarmed.

I suspect Zimmerman is an example of what can go wrong when unvetted and poorly trained citizens are allowed to walk our streets armed with deadly weapons. He and others are more likely to put themselves in harms way, thinking a firearm will protect them can unwittingly create the situation where they or others are killed or wounded.

Ever notice, Wry, how the Liberals among us find it difficult to trust their fellow citizens?

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed the subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing." - Adolf Hitler
 

Forum List

Back
Top