Ousted From Power By Voters, Dems Turn To Activist Judges To Defy Trump

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

What law was brought to a jury or judge with testimony from both sides?

You really are that ignorant? Look it up.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

None of MAGA know the law or the Constitution.,

They are willfully stupid.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Do not, my fellow posters, take Weatherbee53's silly comments as useful.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Fraud requires an actual victim and not merely the apparent, unproven existence of it

what I Say …~…. The United States of America or in other words we the Biden voters of America were targeted to be the victim by Donald Trump.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs DONALD J. TRUMP, Defendant.

VIOLATIONS: Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371. (Conspiracy to Defraud the United. States). Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k). (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding). Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241. (Conspiracy Against Rights)

INDICTMENT The Grand Jury charges that, at all times material to this Indictment, on or about the dates and at the approximate times stated below:

INTRODUCTION

1. The Defendant, DONALD J. TRUMP, was the forty-fifth President of the United States and a candidate for re-election in 2020. The Defendant lost the 2020 presidential election.

2. Despite having lost, the Defendant was determined to remain in power. So for more than two months following election day on November 3, 2020, the Defendant spread lies that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the election and that he had actually won. These claims were false, and the Defendant knew that they were false. But the Defendant repeated and widely. age 2 of 45 disseminated them anyway—to make his knowingly false claims appear legitimate, create an intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger, and erode public faith in the administration of the election.

3. The Defendant had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won. He was also entitled to formally challenge the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means, such as by seeking recounts or audits of the popular vote in states or filing lawsuits challenging ballots and procedures. Indeed, in many cases, the Defendant did pursue these methods of contesting the election results. His efforts to change the outcome in any state through recounts, audits, or legal challenges were uniformly unsuccessful.

4. Shortly after election day, the Defendant also pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results. In so doing, the Defendant perpetrated three criminal conspiracies:

a. A conspiracy to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified by the federal government, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371;

b. A conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the January 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified ("the certification proceeding"), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k);and

c. A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one's vote counted, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241.

Each of these conspiracies—which built on the widespread mistrust the Defendant was creating through pervasive and destabilizing lies about election fraud—targeted a bedrock function of the United States federal government: the nation's process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election ("the federal government function"). Page 3 of 45

COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States—18 U.S.C. § 371)

5. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 4 of this Indictment are re-alleged and fully incorporated here by reference.

The Conspiracy.

6. From on or about November 14, 2020, through on or about January 20, 2021, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the Defendant, DONALD J. TRUMP, did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with co-conspirators, known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified by the federal government.
Purpose of the Conspiracy

7. The purpose of the conspiracy was to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election by using knowingly false claims of election fraud to obstruct the federal government function by which those results are collected, counted, and certified.

The Defendant's Co-Conspirators

8. The Defendant enlisted co-conspirators to assist him in his criminal efforts to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election and retain power. Among these were:

a. b. Co-Conspirator 1, an attorney who was willing to spread knowingly false claims and pursue strategies that the Defendant's 2020 re-election campaign attorneys would not.

Co-Conspirator 2, an attorney who devised and attempted to implement a strategy to leverage the Vice President's ceremonial role overseeing the Page 4 of 45 certification proceeding to obstruct the certification of the presidential election.

c. Co-Conspirator 3, an attorney whose unfounded claims of election fraud the Defendant privately acknowledged to others sounded "crazy." Nonetheless, the Defendant embraced and publicly amplified Co-Conspirator 3's disinformation.

d. Co-Conspirator 4, a Justice Department official who worked on civil
matters and who, with the Defendant, attempted to use the Justice
Department to open sham election crime investigations and influence state legislatures with knowingly false claims of election fraud.

e. Co-Conspirator 5, an attorney who assisted in devising and attempting to implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.

f. Co-Conspirator 6, a political consultant who helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.

The Federal Government Function

9. The federal government function by which the results of the election for President of the United States are collected, counted, and certified was established through the Constitution and the Electoral Count Act (ECA), a federal law enacted in 1887. The Constitution provided that
individuals called electors select the president, and that each state determine for itself how to appoint the electors apportioned to it. Through state laws, each of the fifty states and the District of Columbia chose to select their electors based on the popular vote in the state. After election day, the ECA required each state to formally determine—or "ascertain"—the electors who would represent the state's voters by casting electoral votes on behalf of the candidate who had won the popular vote, and required the executive of each state to certify to the federal government the identities of those electors. Then, on a date set by the ECA, each state's ascertained electors were required to meet and collect the results of the presidential election—that is, to cast electoral votes based on their state's popular vote, and to send their electoral votes, along with the state executive's. Page 5 of 45. certification that they were the state's legitimate electors, to the United States Congress to be counted and certified in an official proceeding. Finally, the Constitution and ECA required that on the sixth of January following election day, the Congress meet in a Joint Session for a certification proceeding, presided over by the Vice President as President of the Senate, to count the electoral votes, resolve any objections, and announce the result—thus certifying the winner of the presidential election as president-elect. This federal government function—from the point of
ascertainment to the certification—is foundational to the United States' democratic process, and until 2021, had operated in a peaceful and orderly manner for more than 130 years.

Manner and Means

10. The Defendant's conspiracy to impair, obstruct, and defeat the federal government function through dishonesty, fraud, and deceit included the following manner and means:

a. The Defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election. fraud to get state legislators and election officials to subvert the legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the Defendant's opponent, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to electoral votes for the Defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the Defendant pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise millions of voters; dismiss legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors in favor of the Defendant.

b. The Defendant and co-conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate electors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then
caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the Page 6 of 45. c. d. e. Vice President and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6. The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to use the power and
authority of the Justice Department to conduct sham election crime
investigations and to send a letter to the targeted states that falsely claimed that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have impacted the election outcome; that sought to advance the Defendant's fraudulent elector plan by using the Justice Department's authority to falsely present the fraudulent electors as a valid alternative to the legitimate electors; and that urged, on behalf of the Justice Department, the targeted states' legislatures to convene to create the opportunity to choose the fraudulent electors over the legitimate electors.

The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to enlist the Vice President to use his ceremonial role at the January 6 certification proceeding to fraudulently alter the election results. First, using knowingly false claims of election fraud, the Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to convince the Vice President to use the Defendant's fraudulent electors, reject legitimate electoral votes, or send legitimate electoral votes to state legislatures for review rather than counting them. When that failed, on the morning of January 6, the Defendant and co-conspirators repeated knowingly false claims of election fraud to gathered supporters, falsely told them that the Vice President had the authority to and might alter the election results, and directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceeding and exert pressure on the Vice President to take the fraudulent actions he had previously refused. After it became public on the afternoon of January 6 that the Vice President would not fraudulently alter the election results, a large and angry crowd—including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results—violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.

The Defendant's Knowledge of the Falsity of His Election Fraud Claims

11. The Defendant, his co-conspirators, and their agents made knowingly false claims that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the 2020 presidential election. These prolific. Page 7 of 45
lies about election fraud included dozens of specific claims that there had been substantial fraud in certain states, such as that large numbers of dead, non-resident, non-citizen, or otherwise
ineligible voters had cast ballots, or that voting machines had changed votes for the Defendant to votes for Biden. These claims were false, and the Defendant knew that they were false. In fact, the Defendant was notified repeatedly that his claims were untrue—often by the people on whom he relied for candid advice on important matters, and who were best positioned to know the facts—and he deliberately disregarded the truth. For instance: a. b. c. d. e. The Defendant's Vice President—who personally stood to gain by remaining in office as part of the Defendant's ticket and whom the Defendant asked to study fraud allegations—told the Defendant that he had seen no evidence of outcome-determinative fraud.

The senior leaders of the Justice Department—appointed by the Defendant and responsible for investigating credible allegations of election crimes— told the Defendant on multiple occasions that various allegations of fraud were unsupported.

The Director of National Intelligence—the Defendant's principal advisor on intelligence matters related to national security—disabused the Defendant of the notion that the Intelligence Community's findings
regarding foreign interference would change the outcome of the election.

The Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ("CISA")—whose existence the Defendant signed into law to protect the nation's cybersecurity infrastructure from attack—joined an official multi-agency statement that there was no evidence any voting system had been compromised and that declared the 2020 election "the most secure in American history." Days later, after the CISA Director—whom the Defendant had appointed—announced publicly that election security experts were in agreement that claims of computer-based election fraud were unsubstantiated, the Defendant fired him.

Senior White House attorneys—selected by the Defendant to provide him candid advice—informed the Defendant that there was no evidence of outcome-determinative election fraud, and told him that his presidency would end on Inauguration Day in 2021.Page 8 of 45

f. Senior staffers on the Defendant's 2020 re-election campaign ("Defendant's Campaign" or "Campaign")—whose sole mission was the Defendant's re-election—told the Defendant on November 7, 2020, that he had only a five to ten percent chance of prevailing in the election, and that success was contingent on the Defendant winning ongoing vote counts or litigation in Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin. Within a week of that assessment, the Defendant lost in Arizona—meaning he had lost the election.

g. State legislators and officials—many of whom were the Defendant's
political allies, had voted for him, and wanted him to be re-elected—
repeatedly informed the Defendant that his claims of fraud in their states,were unsubstantiated or false and resisted his pressure to act based upon them.

h. State and federal courts—the neutral arbiters responsible for ensuring the fair and even-handed administration of election laws—rejected every outcome-determinative post-election lawsuit filed by the Defendant, his co-conspirators, and allies, providing the Defendant real-time notice that his allegations were meritless.

12. The Defendant widely disseminated his false claims of election fraud for months, despite the fact that he knew, and in many cases had been informed directly, that they were not true. The Defendant's knowingly false statements were integral to his criminal plans to defeat the federal government function, obstruct the certification, and interfere with others' right to vote and have their votes counted. He made these knowingly false claims throughout the post-election time
period, including those below that he made immediately before the attack on the Capitol on January 6:

a. b. c. The Defendant insinuated that more than ten thousand dead voters had voted in Georgia. Just four days earlier, Georgia's Secretary of State had explained to the Defendant that this was false.

The Defendant asserted that there had been 205,000 more votes than voters in Pennsylvania. The Defendant's Acting Attorney General and Acting Deputy Attorney General had explained to him that this was false.

The Defendant said that there had been a suspicious vote dump in Detroit, Michigan. The Defendant's Attorney General had explained to the,Defendant that this was false, and the Defendant's allies in the Michigan. Page 9 of 45. state legislature—the Speaker of the House of Representatives and Majority Leader of the Senate—had publicly announced that there was no evidence of substantial fraud in the state.

d. The Defendant claimed that there had been tens of thousands of double votes and other fraud in Nevada. The Nevada Secretary of State had previously rebutted the Defendant's fraud claims by publicly posting a. "Facts vs. Myths" document explaining that Nevada judges had reviewed and rejected them, and the Nevada Supreme Court had rendered a decision denying such claims.

e. The Defendant said that more than 30,000 non-citizens had voted in
Arizona. The Defendant's own Campaign Manager had explained to him that such claims were false, and the Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, who had supported the Defendant in the election, had. issued a public statement that there was no evidence of substantial fraud in. Arizona.

f. The Defendant asserted that voting machines in various contested states had switched votes from the Defendant to Biden. The Defendant's Attorney General, Acting Attorney General, and Acting Deputy Attorney General all had explained to him that this was false, and numerous recounts and audits had confirmed the accuracy of voting machines.

The Criminal Agreement and Acts to Effect the Object of the Conspiracy

The Defendant's Use of Deceit to Get State Officials to Subvert the Legitimate Election Results and Change Electoral Votes

13. Shortly after election day—which fell on November 3, 2020—the Defendant launched his criminal scheme. On November 13, the Defendant's Campaign attorneys conceded in court that he had lost the vote count in the state of Arizona—meaning, based on the assessment the Defendant's Campaign advisors had given him just a week earlier, the Defendant had lost the election. So the next day, the Defendant turned to Co-Conspirator 1, whom he announced would
spearhead his efforts going forward to challenge the election results. From that point on, the Defendant and his co-conspirators executed a strategy to use knowing deceit in the targeted states to impair, obstruct, and defeat the federal government function, including as described below. 10 of 45

Arizona

14. On November 13, 2020, the Defendant had a conversation with his Campaign Manager, who informed him that a claim that had been circulating, that a substantial number of non-citizens had voted in Arizona, was false.

15. On November 22, eight days before Arizona's Governor certified the ascertainmentmof the state's legitimate electors based on the popular vote, the Defendant and Co-Conspirator 1 called the Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and made knowingly false claims of election fraud aimed at interfering with the ascertainment of and voting by Arizona's electors, as,follows:

a. b. c. 16. The Defendant and Co-Conspirator 1 falsely asserted, among other things, that a substantial number of non-citizens, non-residents, and dead peoplemhad voted fraudulently in Arizona. The Arizona House Speaker asked Co- Conspirator 1 for evidence of the claims, which Co-Conspirator 1 did not have, but claimed he would provide. Co-Conspirator 1 never did so.

The Defendant and Co-Conspirator 1 asked the Arizona House Speaker tomcall the legislature into session to hold a hearing based on their claims of election fraud. The Arizona House Speaker refused, stating that doing somwould require a two-thirds vote of its members, and he would not allow it without actual evidence of fraud.

The Defendant and Co-Conspirator 1 asked the Arizona House Speaker to use the legislature to circumvent the process by which legitimate electors would be ascertained for Biden based on the popular vote, and replace those,electors with a new slate for the Defendant. The Arizona House Speaker refused, responding that the suggestion was beyond anything he had ever heard or thought of as something within his authority.

On December 1, Co-Conspirator 1 met with the Arizona House Speaker. When the Arizona House Speaker again asked Co-Conspirator 1 for evidence of the outcome-determinative election fraud he and the Defendant had been claiming, Co-Conspirator 1 responded with words to the effect of, "We don't have the evidence, but we have lots of theories." Page 11 of 45. 17. On December 4, the Arizona House Speaker issued a public statement that said, in part:

No election is perfect, and if there were evidence of illegal votes or
an improper count, then Arizona law provides a process to contest
the election: a lawsuit under state law. But the law does not
authorize the Legislature to reverse the results of an election.

As a conservative Republican, I don't like the results of the
presidential election. I voted for President Trump and worked hard
to reelect him. But I cannot and will not entertain a suggestion that
we violate current law to change the outcome of a certified election.
I and my fellow legislators swore an oath to support the U.S.
Constitution and the constitution and laws of the state of Arizona. It
would violate that oath, the basic principles of republican
government, and the rule of law if we attempted to nullify the
people's vote based on unsupported theories of fraud. Under the
laws that we wrote and voted upon, Arizona voters choose who
wins, and our system requires that their choice be respected.

18. On the morning of January 4, 2021, Co-Conspirator 2 called the Arizona House Speaker to urge him to use a majority of the legislature to decertify the state's legitimate electors.

Arizona's validly ascertained electors had voted three weeks earlier and sent their votes to Congress, which was scheduled to count those votes in Biden's favor in just two days' time at themJanuary 6 certification proceeding. When the Arizona House Speaker explained that stateminvestigations had uncovered no evidence of substantial fraud in the state, Co-Conspirator 2 conceded that he "[didn't] know enough about facts on the ground" in Arizona, but nonetheless told the Arizona House Speaker to decertify and "let the courts sort it out." The Arizona House

Speaker refused, stating that he would not "play with the oath" he had taken to uphold the United States Constitution and Arizona law.

19. On January 6, the Defendant publicly repeated the knowingly false claim that 36,000 non-citizens had voted in Arizona. - 11

 

[Contumacious]

There is such clause. The co-equal nature of the branches means the President executes the laws, not interprets them.

You stupid ignorant dingle berries do not understand the Constitution then blame the Conservative majoruty when it doesn't support your Socialist Demon Rats policies

Separation of Powers Under the Constitution​

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-2/ALDE_00000031/

 

[Contumacious]

The Defendant, DONALD J. TRUMP, was the forty-fifth President of the United States and a candidate for re-election in 2020. The Defendant lost the 2020 presidential election.

Yo Dingle Berry


Hate to burst your bubble but Federal Judge Amy Totenberg found otherwise

The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence " Federal Judge Amy Totenberg , Curling v Raffensperger , Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989 -AT . ND Georgia, Atlanta Division November 10, 2023
Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Yo Dingle Berry


Hate to burst your bubble but Federal Judge Amy Totenberg found otherwise

The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence " Federal Judge Amy Totenberg , Curling v Raffensperger , Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989 -AT . ND Georgia, Atlanta Division November 10, 2023
Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

Curtis Yarvin. The Daily - 'The Interview': Curtis Yarvin Says Democracy Is Done. Powerful Conservatives Are Listening. Transcript and Discussion

The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence " November 10, 2023​

What I say CLXXXVII …~… does that refute any charges in the indictment that the United States government brought against Donald Trump and his co-conspirators? whut 250303 ofpbv00187

 

[CowboyTed]

President Trump campaigned on peace in the Ukraine, and he talked about it constantly.
The American People voted for him in a most decisive manner.
The American People want this pointless, bloody war to stop.
The dems along with zelensky seem to want more war.
The American People are happy that President Trump is working diligently towards peace.
Why do you leftists want more war and blood shed.
There is no revulsion towards President Trump's push for peace. Nobody wants your bloody war to continue.
dems standing in the way of world peace is just bad optics

I don't remember him campaigning to surrender Ukraine to Russia.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

President Trump campaigned on peace in the Ukraine, and he talked about it constantly.

So he lied to you. Or he meant he will get Ukraine to surrender which will be death or prison to every Ukrainian soldier who can’t get out before Putin rolls into Kiev just as Hitler rolled into Paris.

Ukrainians will fight until they can’t fight no more. So the Republican Party is bringing death because the slime Party is giving Putin the support he needs to achieve his original goal.

I hope the free world can go onto a war footing and help. Ukraine pushed back the invader. It’s too bad that the United States of America is no longer a part of the free world. The Republican Party is a deplorable mess of shit stained ignoramus white Christian nationalists you have no idea what they are doing in the name of Jesus their savior and the biblical worldview.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You stupid ignorant dingle berries do not understand the Constitution then blame the Conservative majoruty when it doesn't support your Socialist Demon Rats policies

Separation of Powers Under the Constitution​

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-2/ALDE_00000031/

The doctrine of judicial review keeps the President from being a dictator.

Yes?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yo Dingle Berry
Hate to burst your bubble but Federal Judge Amy Totenberg found otherwise
The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence " Federal Judge Amy Totenberg , Curling v Raffensperger , Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989 -AT . ND Georgia, Atlanta Division November 10, 2023
Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

No, she did not.

 

[Modern Messiah]

So he lied to you. Or he meant he will get Ukraine to surrender which will be death or prison to every Ukrainian soldier who can’t get out before Putin rolls into Kiev just as Hitler rolled into Paris.

View attachment 1085609
Ukrainians will fight until they can’t fight no more. So the Republican Party is bringing death because the slime Party is giving Putin the support he needs to achieve his original goal.

I hope the free world can go onto a war footing and help. Ukraine pushed back the invader. It’s too bad that the United States of America is no longer a part of the free world. The Republican Party is a deplorable mess of shit stained ignoramus white Christian nationalists you have no idea what they are doing in the name of Jesus their savior and the biblical worldview.

Wow!
You've got a wild imagination.
One day your going to make mommy and daddy a lot of money.
It seems like you leftists just want more war.
Zelensky needs to sign the raw minerals deal.
Do you want more war, or do you want to make business and make money.
Why do you leftists want to continue with these bloody never ending wars?
Try to get some perspective.
Try to inform yourself.

 

[Modern Messiah]

I don't remember him campaigning to surrender Ukraine to Russia.

If zelensky would sign the rare earth raw minerals deal Ukraine would be fine. The USA would be financially involved in Ukraine and that would keep Russia out of Ukraine. USA has a long term interest at that point.
Stop being such a war monger.
The American People do not want your endless bloody war. That's why President Trump won in a landslide.
He didn't campaign on Ukraine surrendering to Russia because that's not what's happening.
Try to get informed and try to understand that peace is better than war.

 

[Modern Messiah]

You won't accept the answer, but that stupidity is your problem.

So you still haven't answered the question.
Why did bite me pardon the Jan 6 committee?

 

[Modern Messiah]

You people with Trump Personality Disorder will get what you earn, just like Trump.

Nice word salad.
Again, nobody wants your pointless, endless, bloody war.
President Trump is trying to bring peace instead of war.
That's why The American People voted for him in a massive landslide.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Wow!
You've got a wild imagination.
One day your going to make mommy and daddy a lot of money.
It seems like you leftists just want more war.
Zelensky needs to sign the raw minerals deal.
Do you want more war, or do you want to make business and make money.
Why do you leftists want to continue with these bloody never ending wars?
Try to get some perspective.
Try to inform yourself.

You get that with security guarantees by the US and Europe.

And you THEN get rare earth and metals.

 

[Contumacious]

No, she did not.

The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence " Federal Judge Amy Totenberg , Curling v Raffensperger , Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989 -AT . ND Georgia, Atlanta Division November 10, 2023
Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence " Federal Judge Amy Totenberg , Curling v Raffensperger , Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989 -AT . ND Georgia, Atlanta Division November 10, 2023
Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

You continue to spam nonsense.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Zelensky needs to sign the raw minerals deal.

Why? Trump is Putin’s agent now - Trump is a liar being an agent for a liar who fires missiles at civilians.

Trump already gave Putin everything he wants while Putin continues firing missiles at civilians.

Putin has to be happy with the yellow bellied coward Republicans in the Senate who could stop Trump from commiting the US to the Axis of Evil Russia, North Korean, China

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Hard to find a more transparently pathetic, spineless, and shameless example of the complete abdication of moral American foreign policy leadership than that offered by Trump and Vance to Zelensky (a heroic leader in every meaningful sense).