Oops!!! 1995 NYT East Coast Doomsday Prediction Goes Down Toilet

Oops!!! 1995 NYT East Coast Doomsday Prediction Goes Down Toilet

29 Jun 2021 ~~ By Joseph Vasquez
The climate doom-mongers at The New York Times must now face the reality that their decades-old eco-Armageddon predictions were flat out wrong.
The Times screeched in a 1995 story how “some of the predicted effects of climate change may now be emerging for the first time or with increasing clarity.” One of the predictions included a “[a] continuing rise in average global sea level, which is likely to amount to more than a foot and a half by the year 2100.” The Times then cautioned that an apocalypse for beach-goers would be a likely result: “At the most likely rate of rise, some experts say, most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years.”
Twenty-five years from 1995 would mean the beaches would be gone by 2020. Newsflash: The East Coast beaches are still intact. U.S. News & World Report even ran a report in May 2020 headlined: “16 Top East Coast Beaches to Visit.”
That’s like telling people the sky is falling at the beginning of a drizzle.
But The Times was sure to try to scare readers stiff in 1995 by propagandizing how East Coast beaches were “already disappearing at an average of 2 to 3 feet a year.”
The story’s lede paragraph dripped with green propaganda:

The earth has entered a period of climatic change that is likely to cause widespread economic, social and environmental dislocation over the next century if emissions of heat-trapping gases are not reduced, according to experts advising the world's governments.​
The Times, even after being proved wrong, has continued its environmental crusade over 25 years later. Recently, the newspaper’s Ezra Klein Show host Ezra Klein took eco-nuttiness to a new level by publishing a podcast speculating whether the solution to fighting climate change will include dimming the sun.
The newspaper also just told home-buyers to add “climate hazards” to their checklists when seeking to purchase homes. The Times propagandized that climate change was causing people to wonder “about the risk of natural disaster, and what that risk might mean for a home’s value over time.”

Comment:
**********​
**********​

When FakeNews meets FakeScience...
The Media is always wrong about this stuff but somehow no one seems to remember. Acid rain was supposed to have wiped us out by now.
Our beaches were supposed to disappear.
Parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn should be under water today...
According to the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and Al Bore this is settled science.
Yet have no fear, the PM/DSA Dem Commies will attempt to vindicate themselves by pointing out that it is hot at the end of June. Who would have guessed that??
We as humans have zero control and zero ability to significantly change the way our planet operates on its own. We call it "Mother Nature".
But think of all the prog slaves who believe it was going to happen and left, then people like Barrack Hussain Obama comes in and buys up beachfront property. That is why stupid prog slaves are always getting fucked by their elites..
On the Beach

Does OBi Wan Kenyobi call his mansion "Xanadindu"?
 

Oops!!! 1995 NYT East Coast Doomsday Prediction Goes Down Toilet

29 Jun 2021 ~~ By Joseph Vasquez
The climate doom-mongers at The New York Times must now face the reality that their decades-old eco-Armageddon predictions were flat out wrong.
The Times screeched in a 1995 story how “some of the predicted effects of climate change may now be emerging for the first time or with increasing clarity.” One of the predictions included a “[a] continuing rise in average global sea level, which is likely to amount to more than a foot and a half by the year 2100.” The Times then cautioned that an apocalypse for beach-goers would be a likely result: “At the most likely rate of rise, some experts say, most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years.”
Twenty-five years from 1995 would mean the beaches would be gone by 2020. Newsflash: The East Coast beaches are still intact. U.S. News & World Report even ran a report in May 2020 headlined: “16 Top East Coast Beaches to Visit.”
That’s like telling people the sky is falling at the beginning of a drizzle.
But The Times was sure to try to scare readers stiff in 1995 by propagandizing how East Coast beaches were “already disappearing at an average of 2 to 3 feet a year.”
The story’s lede paragraph dripped with green propaganda:

The earth has entered a period of climatic change that is likely to cause widespread economic, social and environmental dislocation over the next century if emissions of heat-trapping gases are not reduced, according to experts advising the world's governments.​
The Times, even after being proved wrong, has continued its environmental crusade over 25 years later. Recently, the newspaper’s Ezra Klein Show host Ezra Klein took eco-nuttiness to a new level by publishing a podcast speculating whether the solution to fighting climate change will include dimming the sun.
The newspaper also just told home-buyers to add “climate hazards” to their checklists when seeking to purchase homes. The Times propagandized that climate change was causing people to wonder “about the risk of natural disaster, and what that risk might mean for a home’s value over time.”

Comment:
**********​
**********​

When FakeNews meets FakeScience...
The Media is always wrong about this stuff but somehow no one seems to remember. Acid rain was supposed to have wiped us out by now.
Our beaches were supposed to disappear.
Parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn should be under water today...
According to the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and Al Bore this is settled science.
Yet have no fear, the PM/DSA Dem Commies will attempt to vindicate themselves by pointing out that it is hot at the end of June. Who would have guessed that??
We as humans have zero control and zero ability to significantly change the way our planet operates on its own. We call it "Mother Nature".
Reading a Newspaper in the Boxcars Taking Them to the Concentration Camps

There was a preview of 9/11 in 1973 when the Israelis shot down an unauthorized flight over their territory because they had found out that the terrorists planned to hijack an airplane and fly it into a building to kill thousands of people. The wimpy Woody Allen type Jews at the New York Times dismissed the Israelis' claim as unJewish tough-guy talk.

Since nobody on either side of the duopoly points to the takedown of Libyan Arab Airlines Flight 114 as the most important untold fact about 9/11, Netwits will also dismiss my information as irrelevant.
~~~~~~
Link(s) ?
 
If you read the article, you find ... it was spot on correct about almost everything. The only thing it got wrong the rate of beach erosion.

Obviously, none of the denier nitwits read it. They never do. They just wait to learn what their cult wants them to say about something, then they bleat.

Back in reality, the climate predictions have been remarkably accurate. That success record is why climate science has such an crediblity -- it's earned it through 40+ years of successful predictions.

In that same reality, deniers have faceplanted with every single prediction. That unbroken 40 year streak of humiliating failure is why they're universally laughed at. Heck, almost all of them are still predicting a new ice age any day now, as they have constantly for the past 40 years. Their HolyIceAge never arrives, but the faith of the denier religious zealots remains undimmed. They're an apocalypse cult. Each time their icy apocalypse fails to arrive, they just push the date back some more.

Remember, denier cult losers, your gaslighting has no effect on honest and intelligent people. We know you're lying. Your propaganda only works on other cult imbeciles.

~~~~~~
Link(s)?
 

Oops!!! 1995 NYT East Coast Doomsday Prediction Goes Down Toilet

29 Jun 2021 ~~ By Joseph Vasquez
The climate doom-mongers at The New York Times must now face the reality that their decades-old eco-Armageddon predictions were flat out wrong.
The Times screeched in a 1995 story how “some of the predicted effects of climate change may now be emerging for the first time or with increasing clarity.” One of the predictions included a “[a] continuing rise in average global sea level, which is likely to amount to more than a foot and a half by the year 2100.” The Times then cautioned that an apocalypse for beach-goers would be a likely result: “At the most likely rate of rise, some experts say, most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years.”
Twenty-five years from 1995 would mean the beaches would be gone by 2020. Newsflash: The East Coast beaches are still intact. U.S. News & World Report even ran a report in May 2020 headlined: “16 Top East Coast Beaches to Visit.”
That’s like telling people the sky is falling at the beginning of a drizzle.
But The Times was sure to try to scare readers stiff in 1995 by propagandizing how East Coast beaches were “already disappearing at an average of 2 to 3 feet a year.”
The story’s lede paragraph dripped with green propaganda:

The earth has entered a period of climatic change that is likely to cause widespread economic, social and environmental dislocation over the next century if emissions of heat-trapping gases are not reduced, according to experts advising the world's governments.​
The Times, even after being proved wrong, has continued its environmental crusade over 25 years later. Recently, the newspaper’s Ezra Klein Show host Ezra Klein took eco-nuttiness to a new level by publishing a podcast speculating whether the solution to fighting climate change will include dimming the sun.
The newspaper also just told home-buyers to add “climate hazards” to their checklists when seeking to purchase homes. The Times propagandized that climate change was causing people to wonder “about the risk of natural disaster, and what that risk might mean for a home’s value over time.”

Comment:
**********​
**********​

When FakeNews meets FakeScience...
The Media is always wrong about this stuff but somehow no one seems to remember. Acid rain was supposed to have wiped us out by now.
Our beaches were supposed to disappear.
Parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn should be under water today...
According to the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and Al Bore this is settled science.
Yet have no fear, the PM/DSA Dem Commies will attempt to vindicate themselves by pointing out that it is hot at the end of June. Who would have guessed that??
We as humans have zero control and zero ability to significantly change the way our planet operates on its own. We call it "Mother Nature".
It was a prediction with an estimated time line. Naturally climate change deniers are ecstatic that the time line is off. Main point that sea levels are rising is still valid...Is sea level rising?
Okay moron, here is an estimated time line for the end of the world, and it wont be by Global Cooling, Global Warming, the Ozone depleting or Climate change. In the future the world will end when....

Yellowstone Supervolcano blows
Earth hit by a comet
The sun stops shining.



Another whimper from a climate change denier..yawn.

Only a Heavy Carbon Footprint Can Stomp Viruses to Extinction

You shouldn't use a term appropriately reserved for swasticky Holocaust deniers. Ironically so, because mass-murdering viruses can only survive in what you degenerate nature-worshipers call "Clean Air." Your weak, comprising, and unthinking authorized opponents will never bring out the long-proven fact that natural air has been the cause of most deaths, even in war. So you're still safe to preach the sermons of your death cult. The next Green Death will hit us without any warning from the self-appointed experts.
 
Last edited:

Oops!!! 1995 NYT East Coast Doomsday Prediction Goes Down Toilet

29 Jun 2021 ~~ By Joseph Vasquez
The climate doom-mongers at The New York Times must now face the reality that their decades-old eco-Armageddon predictions were flat out wrong.
The Times screeched in a 1995 story how “some of the predicted effects of climate change may now be emerging for the first time or with increasing clarity.” One of the predictions included a “[a] continuing rise in average global sea level, which is likely to amount to more than a foot and a half by the year 2100.” The Times then cautioned that an apocalypse for beach-goers would be a likely result: “At the most likely rate of rise, some experts say, most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years.”
Twenty-five years from 1995 would mean the beaches would be gone by 2020. Newsflash: The East Coast beaches are still intact. U.S. News & World Report even ran a report in May 2020 headlined: “16 Top East Coast Beaches to Visit.”
That’s like telling people the sky is falling at the beginning of a drizzle.
But The Times was sure to try to scare readers stiff in 1995 by propagandizing how East Coast beaches were “already disappearing at an average of 2 to 3 feet a year.”
The story’s lede paragraph dripped with green propaganda:

The earth has entered a period of climatic change that is likely to cause widespread economic, social and environmental dislocation over the next century if emissions of heat-trapping gases are not reduced, according to experts advising the world's governments.​
The Times, even after being proved wrong, has continued its environmental crusade over 25 years later. Recently, the newspaper’s Ezra Klein Show host Ezra Klein took eco-nuttiness to a new level by publishing a podcast speculating whether the solution to fighting climate change will include dimming the sun.
The newspaper also just told home-buyers to add “climate hazards” to their checklists when seeking to purchase homes. The Times propagandized that climate change was causing people to wonder “about the risk of natural disaster, and what that risk might mean for a home’s value over time.”

Comment:
**********​
**********​

When FakeNews meets FakeScience...
The Media is always wrong about this stuff but somehow no one seems to remember. Acid rain was supposed to have wiped us out by now.
Our beaches were supposed to disappear.
Parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn should be under water today...
According to the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and Al Bore this is settled science.
Yet have no fear, the PM/DSA Dem Commies will attempt to vindicate themselves by pointing out that it is hot at the end of June. Who would have guessed that??
We as humans have zero control and zero ability to significantly change the way our planet operates on its own. We call it "Mother Nature".
It was a prediction with an estimated time line. Naturally climate change deniers are ecstatic that the time line is off. Main point that sea levels are rising is still valid...Is sea level rising?

You lied twice in your comment.

No one is denying that Climate can change and no one is disputing the well known sea level rise.

When people like you lie over small things, you are likely lying over bigger things too.
I am disputing the rise in sea levels. When i was living in Jacksonville Fl 50 years ago, the water never came up to the grass. Today the water still doesnt come up to the grass..


Bunch of lying pieces of shit who are on the left.

Milena-Cardoso-and-Fernanda-Uesler---Bikini-Candids-at-the-Beach-in-Miami--06.jpg
 
If you read the article, you find ... it was spot on correct about almost everything. The only thing it got wrong the rate of beach erosion.

Obviously, none of the denier nitwits read it. They never do. They just wait to learn what their cult wants them to say about something, then they bleat.

Back in reality, the climate predictions have been remarkably accurate. That success record is why climate science has such an crediblity -- it's earned it through 40+ years of successful predictions.

In that same reality, deniers have faceplanted with every single prediction. That unbroken 40 year streak of humiliating failure is why they're universally laughed at. Heck, almost all of them are still predicting a new ice age any day now, as they have constantly for the past 40 years. Their HolyIceAge never arrives, but the faith of the denier religious zealots remains undimmed. They're an apocalypse cult. Each time their icy apocalypse fails to arrive, they just push the date back some more.

Remember, denier cult losers, your gaslighting has no effect on honest and intelligent people. We know you're lying. Your propaganda only works on other cult imbeciles.
Back in reality, the climate predictions have been remarkably accurate.
Bwaahhhaaaaaaa...No it isnt. You need to change your name from mamooth to baffoon.
 
If you read the article, you find ... it was spot on correct about almost everything. The only thing it got wrong the rate of beach erosion.

Obviously, none of the denier nitwits read it. They never do. They just wait to learn what their cult wants them to say about something, then they bleat.

Back in reality, the climate predictions have been remarkably accurate. That success record is why climate science has such an crediblity -- it's earned it through 40+ years of successful predictions.

In that same reality, deniers have faceplanted with every single prediction. That unbroken 40 year streak of humiliating failure is why they're universally laughed at. Heck, almost all of them are still predicting a new ice age any day now, as they have constantly for the past 40 years. Their HolyIceAge never arrives, but the faith of the denier religious zealots remains undimmed. They're an apocalypse cult. Each time their icy apocalypse fails to arrive, they just push the date back some more.

Remember, denier cult losers, your gaslighting has no effect on honest and intelligent people. We know you're lying. Your propaganda only works on other cult imbeciles.

Most of the beaches gone? Really?

Forests gone?
 

Oops!!! 1995 NYT East Coast Doomsday Prediction Goes Down Toilet

29 Jun 2021 ~~ By Joseph Vasquez
The climate doom-mongers at The New York Times must now face the reality that their decades-old eco-Armageddon predictions were flat out wrong.
The Times screeched in a 1995 story how “some of the predicted effects of climate change may now be emerging for the first time or with increasing clarity.” One of the predictions included a “[a] continuing rise in average global sea level, which is likely to amount to more than a foot and a half by the year 2100.” The Times then cautioned that an apocalypse for beach-goers would be a likely result: “At the most likely rate of rise, some experts say, most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years.”
Twenty-five years from 1995 would mean the beaches would be gone by 2020. Newsflash: The East Coast beaches are still intact. U.S. News & World Report even ran a report in May 2020 headlined: “16 Top East Coast Beaches to Visit.”
That’s like telling people the sky is falling at the beginning of a drizzle.
But The Times was sure to try to scare readers stiff in 1995 by propagandizing how East Coast beaches were “already disappearing at an average of 2 to 3 feet a year.”
The story’s lede paragraph dripped with green propaganda:

The earth has entered a period of climatic change that is likely to cause widespread economic, social and environmental dislocation over the next century if emissions of heat-trapping gases are not reduced, according to experts advising the world's governments.​
The Times, even after being proved wrong, has continued its environmental crusade over 25 years later. Recently, the newspaper’s Ezra Klein Show host Ezra Klein took eco-nuttiness to a new level by publishing a podcast speculating whether the solution to fighting climate change will include dimming the sun.
The newspaper also just told home-buyers to add “climate hazards” to their checklists when seeking to purchase homes. The Times propagandized that climate change was causing people to wonder “about the risk of natural disaster, and what that risk might mean for a home’s value over time.”

Comment:
**********​
**********​

When FakeNews meets FakeScience...
The Media is always wrong about this stuff but somehow no one seems to remember. Acid rain was supposed to have wiped us out by now.
Our beaches were supposed to disappear.
Parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn should be under water today...
According to the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and Al Bore this is settled science.
Yet have no fear, the PM/DSA Dem Commies will attempt to vindicate themselves by pointing out that it is hot at the end of June. Who would have guessed that??
We as humans have zero control and zero ability to significantly change the way our planet operates on its own. We call it "Mother Nature".
It was a prediction with an estimated time line. Naturally climate change deniers are ecstatic that the time line is off. Main point that sea levels are rising is still valid...Is sea level rising?
Okay moron, here is an estimated time line for the end of the world, and it wont be by Global Cooling, Global Warming, the Ozone depleting or Climate change. In the future the world will end when....

Yellowstone Supervolcano blows
Earth hit by a comet
The sun stops shining.



Another whimper from a climate change denier..yawn.

Only a Heavy Carbon Footprint Can Stomp Viruses to Extinction

You shouldn't use a term appropriately reserved for swasticky Holocaust deniers. Ironically so, because mass-murdering viruses can only survive in what you degenerate nature-worshipers call "Clean Air." Your weak, comprising, and unthinking authorized opponents will never bring out the long-proven fact that natural air has been the cause of most deaths, even in war. So you're still safe to preach the sermons of your death cult. The next Green Death will hit us without any warning from the self-appointed experts.

~~~~~~
Link(s) ?
 

Oops!!! 1995 NYT East Coast Doomsday Prediction Goes Down Toilet

29 Jun 2021 ~~ By Joseph Vasquez
The climate doom-mongers at The New York Times must now face the reality that their decades-old eco-Armageddon predictions were flat out wrong.
The Times screeched in a 1995 story how “some of the predicted effects of climate change may now be emerging for the first time or with increasing clarity.” One of the predictions included a “[a] continuing rise in average global sea level, which is likely to amount to more than a foot and a half by the year 2100.” The Times then cautioned that an apocalypse for beach-goers would be a likely result: “At the most likely rate of rise, some experts say, most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years.”
Twenty-five years from 1995 would mean the beaches would be gone by 2020. Newsflash: The East Coast beaches are still intact. U.S. News & World Report even ran a report in May 2020 headlined: “16 Top East Coast Beaches to Visit.”
That’s like telling people the sky is falling at the beginning of a drizzle.
But The Times was sure to try to scare readers stiff in 1995 by propagandizing how East Coast beaches were “already disappearing at an average of 2 to 3 feet a year.”
The story’s lede paragraph dripped with green propaganda:

The earth has entered a period of climatic change that is likely to cause widespread economic, social and environmental dislocation over the next century if emissions of heat-trapping gases are not reduced, according to experts advising the world's governments.​
The Times, even after being proved wrong, has continued its environmental crusade over 25 years later. Recently, the newspaper’s Ezra Klein Show host Ezra Klein took eco-nuttiness to a new level by publishing a podcast speculating whether the solution to fighting climate change will include dimming the sun.
The newspaper also just told home-buyers to add “climate hazards” to their checklists when seeking to purchase homes. The Times propagandized that climate change was causing people to wonder “about the risk of natural disaster, and what that risk might mean for a home’s value over time.”

Comment:
**********​
**********​

When FakeNews meets FakeScience...
The Media is always wrong about this stuff but somehow no one seems to remember. Acid rain was supposed to have wiped us out by now.
Our beaches were supposed to disappear.
Parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn should be under water today...
According to the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and Al Bore this is settled science.
Yet have no fear, the PM/DSA Dem Commies will attempt to vindicate themselves by pointing out that it is hot at the end of June. Who would have guessed that??
We as humans have zero control and zero ability to significantly change the way our planet operates on its own. We call it "Mother Nature".
Reading a Newspaper in the Boxcars Taking Them to the Concentration Camps

There was a preview of 9/11 in 1973 when the Israelis shot down an unauthorized flight over their territory because they had found out that the terrorists planned to hijack an airplane and fly it into a building to kill thousands of people. The wimpy Woody Allen type Jews at the New York Times dismissed the Israelis' claim as unJewish tough-guy talk.

Since nobody on either side of the duopoly points to the takedown of Libyan Arab Airlines Flight 114 as the most important untold fact about 9/11, Netwits will also dismiss my information as irrelevant.
~~~~~~
Link(s) ?
All the News Fit to Spit

Look up the pompous pearl-clutching NYTwit editorials after the takedown on February 21, 1973. They are as disgraceful as the Warmalarmie scare stories' outcome. If those pseudo-intellectual frauds were as perceptive as they pretend to be, they would have agreed that the Israelis were not trigger-happy paranoiacs and warned America that the same tactic could be used in America, regardless of the fact that the airplane's incompetent Arab pilot was merely lost and not a terrorist.
 

Oops!!! 1995 NYT East Coast Doomsday Prediction Goes Down Toilet

29 Jun 2021 ~~ By Joseph Vasquez
The climate doom-mongers at The New York Times must now face the reality that their decades-old eco-Armageddon predictions were flat out wrong.
The Times screeched in a 1995 story how “some of the predicted effects of climate change may now be emerging for the first time or with increasing clarity.” One of the predictions included a “[a] continuing rise in average global sea level, which is likely to amount to more than a foot and a half by the year 2100.” The Times then cautioned that an apocalypse for beach-goers would be a likely result: “At the most likely rate of rise, some experts say, most of the beaches on the East Coast of the United States would be gone in 25 years.”
Twenty-five years from 1995 would mean the beaches would be gone by 2020. Newsflash: The East Coast beaches are still intact. U.S. News & World Report even ran a report in May 2020 headlined: “16 Top East Coast Beaches to Visit.”
That’s like telling people the sky is falling at the beginning of a drizzle.
But The Times was sure to try to scare readers stiff in 1995 by propagandizing how East Coast beaches were “already disappearing at an average of 2 to 3 feet a year.”
The story’s lede paragraph dripped with green propaganda:

The earth has entered a period of climatic change that is likely to cause widespread economic, social and environmental dislocation over the next century if emissions of heat-trapping gases are not reduced, according to experts advising the world's governments.​
The Times, even after being proved wrong, has continued its environmental crusade over 25 years later. Recently, the newspaper’s Ezra Klein Show host Ezra Klein took eco-nuttiness to a new level by publishing a podcast speculating whether the solution to fighting climate change will include dimming the sun.
The newspaper also just told home-buyers to add “climate hazards” to their checklists when seeking to purchase homes. The Times propagandized that climate change was causing people to wonder “about the risk of natural disaster, and what that risk might mean for a home’s value over time.”

Comment:
**********​
**********​

When FakeNews meets FakeScience...
The Media is always wrong about this stuff but somehow no one seems to remember. Acid rain was supposed to have wiped us out by now.
Our beaches were supposed to disappear.
Parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn should be under water today...
According to the Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and Al Bore this is settled science.
Yet have no fear, the PM/DSA Dem Commies will attempt to vindicate themselves by pointing out that it is hot at the end of June. Who would have guessed that??
We as humans have zero control and zero ability to significantly change the way our planet operates on its own. We call it "Mother Nature".
It was a prediction with an estimated time line. Naturally climate change deniers are ecstatic that the time line is off. Main point that sea levels are rising is still valid...Is sea level rising?
Okay moron, here is an estimated time line for the end of the world, and it wont be by Global Cooling, Global Warming, the Ozone depleting or Climate change. In the future the world will end when....

Yellowstone Supervolcano blows
Earth hit by a comet
The sun stops shining.



Another whimper from a climate change denier..yawn.

Only a Heavy Carbon Footprint Can Stomp Viruses to Extinction

You shouldn't use a term appropriately reserved for swasticky Holocaust deniers. Ironically so, because mass-murdering viruses can only survive in what you degenerate nature-worshipers call "Clean Air." Your weak, comprising, and unthinking authorized opponents will never bring out the long-proven fact that natural air has been the cause of most deaths, even in war. So you're still safe to preach the sermons of your death cult. The next Green Death will hit us without any warning from the self-appointed experts.

~~~~~~
Link(s) ?

Links Ain't Thinks

Links are part of a chain of smug ignorance or self-serving deception.
 
Democrats rule by fear; its all they have.

You're either a victim or they try to scare you. One way or the other, they try to manipulate you into thinking their way.

It's all they've got.
Social Jussie Warriors

To compensate for their inferiority in everything else, Liberals also get a comforting feeling of moral superiority by convincing themselves that fake victimization is genuine.
 
Another thread where Climate change gooks quickly abandon as soon as detailed opposition appears which is unsurprising since it would require rational thinking to respond to details that doesn't agree with their unicorn dreams.

They ignored the details in posts 1, 14, 15, 17

Here is the awesome contribution from Colonel Gook (aka Ben Thompson) saying nothing of value:

Post 5:

"It was a prediction with an estimated time line. Naturally climate change deniers are ecstatic that the time line is off. Main point that sea levels are rising is still valid...Is sea level rising?"

No one dispute a rising sea level, it is the claims of acceleration that is false you climate gook.

Post 11: "Another whimper from a climate change denier..yawn."

The gook ran away from multiple links showing the opposite of what Ben believes but can't afford to burn up his brain with something called a counterpoint that he failed in his gookery crap.

Post 12: "That coming from a sky is falling winger..priceless"

The gook on a roll with another useless empty reply.

Then the gook ran away after he must of have read MY post 15 exposing two of his lies, what a guy who posted empty replies and provable lies.

He also stayed away from Post 17 too even Mamooth ran away as well.

Suggest you stay away from climate stuff since you offer nothing beyond being a zipperhead.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top