When government action attempts to narrow income gaps, the pro-liberty position is to support this
1) Our Founders understood that all the evil in human history had been caused by big liberal government so they created America to have liberty or freedom from big liberal government. Jefferson knew this without seeing the 20th Century. You have seen it yet still lack the IQ to understand even that. See why we say the liberal will have a low IQ? Now do you understand why the liberal spied for Stalin's big liberal government?
2) If you don't like how much money Bill Gates has you have the right in a free society to persuade people not to cause the income gap by buying his products. You might even recommend that they buy your products or a competitors instead, but you don't have the right to steal money from him at the point of a liberal gun just because other free people are at liberty to buy his products!
Why do liberals always turn to violence when they don't get their way through peaceful means? Its disgusting and very anti-American.
"When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
-- Benjamin Franklin
I hope you understand that monarchy is actually a form of conservative government by definition.
Just a friendly fact.
monarchy and Communism represent big liberal government I'm afraid. Conservatives are for very small or limited government. Jefferson did not care what rationale kings or communist dictators used to consolidate power. He was against all forms of liberal government regardless of rationale. Got it straight yet?
Last edited: