One of The Best and Most Important Stories About Afghanistan

Discussion in 'Afghanistan' started by QUENTIN, Apr 5, 2010.

  1. QUENTIN
    Offline

    QUENTIN VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    964
    Thanks Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +203
    One of the best and most important articles I've read on the war:

    How Americans are propagandized about Afghanistan

    On February 12 of this year, U.S. forces entered a village in the Paktia Province in Afghanistan and, after surrounding a home where a celebration of a new birth was taking place, shot dead two male civilians (government officials) who exited the house in order to inquire why they had been surrounded, and then shot and killed three female relatives (a pregnant mother of ten, a pregnant mother of six, and a teenager) who sought to help the victims. The Pentagon then issued a statement claiming that (a) the dead males were "insurgents" or terrorists, (b) the bodies of the three women had been found by U.S. forces bound and gagged inside the home, and (c) suggested that the women had already been killed by the time the U.S. had arrived, likely the victim of "honor killings" by the Taliban militants killed in the attack.

    Although numerous witnesses on the scene as well as local investigators vehemently disputed the Pentagon's version, and insisted that all of the dead (including the women) were civilians and were killed by U.S. forces, the American media largely adopted the Pentagon's version, often without any questions. But enough evidence has now emerged disproving those claims such that the Pentagon was forced yesterday to admit that their original version was totally false and that it was U.S. troops who killed the women:

    One NATO official said that there had likely been an effort to cover-up what happened by U.S. troops via evidence tampering on the scene (though other NATO officials deny this claim). The Times of London actually reported yesterday that, at least according to Afghan investigators, "US special forces soldiers dug bullets out of their victims’ bodies in the bloody aftermath of a botched night raid, then washed the wounds with alcohol before lying to their superiors about what happened."

    What is clear -- yet again -- is how completely misinformed and propagandized Americans continue to be by the American media, which constantly "reports" on crucial events in Afghanistan by doing nothing more than mindlessly and unquestioningly passing along U.S. government claims as though they are fact. Here, for instance, is how the Paktia incident was "reported" by CNN on February 12:

    [​IMG]

    Note how the headline states as fact that the women were dead as the result of an "honor killing." The entire CNN article does nothing but repeat what an "unnamed senior military official said" about the incident, and it even helpfully explained:

    Similarly, The New York Times, while noting that there were "varying accounts of what happened" among U.S. forces and their allies in the Afghan police, also passed along the Pentagon's false version of events with no questioning. Here's the NYT's February 12 article in its entirety:

    CNN conveyed its version of events without the slightest contradiction or doubt, and the NYT simply ignored entirely the claims of the residents of the village -- notwithstanding the fact that serious conflicts about what actually took place were known from the very beginning. Consider, for instance, this February 12 article by Amir Shah of the Associated Press, who actually bothered to pick up a phone to determine if the Pentagon's claims were true before "reporting" them as fact; this is what Shah found:

    The Pentagon's version of events was vehemently disputed from the start. But there was not a hint of any of that in the CNN or NYT "reporting," which simply adopted the press release claims of NATO forces. That Press Release, false from start to finish, claimed that "a combined force of Afghan and international troops last night found the bound and gagged bodies of two women and the bodies of two men during an operation in the province's Gardez district," and "members of the combined force found the bodies inside." Ironically, the Pentagon Press Release ended this way: "'ISAF continually works with our Afghan partners to fight criminals and terrorists who do not care about the life of civilians,' ISAF spokesman Canadian army Brig. Gen. Eric Tremblay said." On March 16 -- more than a month later, and only after a major investigative report about this incident was published by Jerome Starkey of The Times of London -- the NYT ran a story detailing the gruesome claims of residents about what really happened; click that link for the horrific details and to get a sense for how false were the Pentagon and U.S. media's original claims about what took place.

    Contrast the pure propaganda dissemination of the American media with the immediate reporting of the Pajhwok Afghan News, an independent news agency created in Afghanistan to enable war reporting by Afghans. Here is how they reported the Pakita incident from the beginning, on Febraury 12 (via NEXIS):
    Note the crucial difference: the Afghan news service shaped its report based on the statements of actual witnesses on the ground and local investigators, while also including the Pentagon's version of events. Put another way, anyone reading about what happened from American news outlets would be completely misled and propagandized, while anyone reading the Pajhowk Afghan News would have been informed, because they treated official U.S. claims with skepticism rather than uncritical reverence.

    * * * * *

    All of this is a chronic problem, not an isolated one, with war reporting generally and events in Afghanistan specifically. Just consider what happened when the U.S. military was forced in 2008 to retract its claims about a brutal air raid in Azizabad. The Pentagon had vehemently denied the villagers' claim that close to 100 civilians had been killed and that no Taliban were in the vicinity: until a video emerged proving the villagers' claims were true and the Pentagon's false. Last week, TPM highlighted a recent, largely overlooked statement from Gen. McChrystal, where he admitted, regarding U.S. killings of Afghans at check points: "to my knowledge, in the nine-plus months I've been here, not a single case where we have engaged in an escalation of force incident and hurt someone has it turned out that the vehicle had a suicide bomb or weapons in it and, in many cases, had families in it. . . . We've shot an amazing number of people and killed a number and, to my knowledge, none has proven to have been a real threat to the force." And as I documented before, the U.S. media constantly repeats false Pentagon claims about American air attacks around the world in order to create the false impression that Key Terrorists were killed while no civilians were.

    At the Nieman Watchdog Foundation, Jerome Starkey, the Afghanistan war reporter for The Times of London who published the March 13 investigative report, has a crucial, must-read piece on all of this. Amazingly, his Nieman piece was written three weeks ago, and recounted in detail: (a) how clearly the U.S.-led forces had lied about what happened in Paktia; and (b) the reasons why the U.S. media continuously spews false government propaganda about the war. Starkey wrote under this headline:

    [​IMG]

    In this mid-March piece, Starkey explained how he had discovered that NATO's claims about the Paktia incident were false (he recounted that evidence in gruesome detail in the Times on March 13, three days before the NYT finally returned to the story to correct its original reporting), and more importantly, highlighted why the U.S. media so frequently disseminates false NATO claims with no questioning:

    Starkey describes some of the understandable reasons so many reporters do nothing more than regurgitate officials claims: resource constraints, organizations limits, dangers of traveling around, and the "embed culture." But he also recounts how NATO tries to intimidate, censor and punish any reporters like him who report adversely on official claims. Illustratively, in response to Starkey's March 13 article detailing what really happened at Paktia and the cover-up that ensued, NATO issued a formal statement singling him out and accusing him of publishing an article that was "categorically false." As recently as that mid-March statement, NATO was still claiming -- falsely -- that the women in Paktia were killed prior to the arrival of American troops, and they were impugning the integrity of the reporter (Starkey) who was proving otherwise.

    There are some very courageous and intrepid reporters in Afghanistan, including some who work for American media outlets. It was, for instance, a superb and brave investigative report by the NYT's Carlotta Gall in Afghanistan that uncovered what really happened in that air attack on Azizabad and who documented the Pentagon's false claims. But far more often, Americans are completely misled about events in Afghanistan by the combination of false official claims and mindless stenographic American "journalism." And no matter how many times this process is exposed -- from Jessica Lynch's heroic firefight to Pat Tillman's death by Al Qeada -- this relentless propaganda machine never seems to diminish.
     
  2. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Salon.com. For a minute there, I was actually gonna read this shit. Thank God, I checked the 'source' before I wasted minutes of my life.
     
  3. DiamondDave
    Offline

    DiamondDave Army Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    18,169
    Thanks Received:
    2,812
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    MD, on the Potomac River
    Ratings:
    +2,816
    Figured it would have to be a winger site such as salon or huffypuffy
     
  4. QUENTIN
    Offline

    QUENTIN VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    964
    Thanks Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +203
    What it's reporting on is the fact that NATO has now had to issue a press release admitting that for over a month it had been lying about and actively covering up the execution of three pregnant women and two civilians in cold blood by U.S. Troops.

    NATO's report had claimed the women were found bound and already dead when troops arrived, likely the result of an "honor killing" by the Taliban perhaps for working with coalition forces. This was then passed on uncritically by CNN, The NY Times, and many other media outlets deemed "liberal" as well as the entirety of the rest of the mainstream press, conservative press, etc.

    Investigative reporters went to the scene and discovered that story was a 100% intentional lie and actually amassed so much proof that after a month of denying it, NATO finally had to go on record and admit that yes, U.S. troops shot down innocent and unarmed pregnant women as the women tried to help their dying (also unarmed, also innocent civilian) family members in the street, and yes they lied about it then covered it up then lied about it some more.

    This is all independently verifiable via the ISAF's own official website, which is linked to in the article. The article is chock full of links to all of the sources and other news stories, press releases, and official government reports it references.

    It also re-publishes the incredible quote that is being widely circulated but has been ignored by the mainstream media, General Stanley McChrystal, the Commander of US, NATO, & JSOC forces in Afghanistan admitting on the record:

    To be skeptical of a news story due to its source is smart and savvy. To completely ignore reading a news story due to its source is stupid and willfully ignorant.

    There are many other news outlets now reporting on this story, this article just happened to be the best one. But you can't dismiss the factual content contained therein just because it happened to be covered by a news organization you deem liberal.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2010
  5. LibocalypseNow
    Offline

    LibocalypseNow Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    12,337
    Thanks Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,357
    You mean CNN (Communist News Network) and the NY Slimes were covering for their Hopey Changey again? No way! Can't be? Oh well if it ain't Da BOOOOOOOOOOSSH,the Liberal Media just ain't interested in such things. It is what it is i guess.
     
  6. LibocalypseNow
    Offline

    LibocalypseNow Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    12,337
    Thanks Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,357
    Oh yea you can bet if a Republican President was in there,ole Wolfy Blitzer and the NY Slimes would be up on their high horses preaching away 24/7. It's their Hopey Changey so all is well i guess. The Liberal Press is a joke at this point.
     
  7. hyakku
    Offline

    hyakku Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    193
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +34
    Yea even though one of the stories retracted was from 2008 when Bush was president, but ok cool. RTFA before commenting next time.

    Our media, liberal and right wing, have problems here in America. Trying to divide it as a partisan issue ignores the true fault here; we need more accurate, transparent media in our country on both ends of the spectrum.
     
  8. LibocalypseNow
    Offline

    LibocalypseNow Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    12,337
    Thanks Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,357
    Yea it was just an "Honor Killing." Man if this President had an 'R' by his name,CNN (Communist News Network) and the NY Slimes would have never reported it that way. They would have instead immediately declared the soldiers guilty. I don't care how their fellow Liberals try and spin this,most common sense thinking people understand what i'm saying.
     
  9. hyakku
    Offline

    hyakku Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    193
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +34
    Yes, everyone gets what you are saying. Just like in 2008 when Fox news did the SAME thing for the Bush administration and was forced to backtrack.

    I don't see why this is JUST a liberal problem. American media in general have this problem, whether you want to see it or not. Jeez, you can't even agree with you people without getting into an argument :lol:
     
  10. BolshevikHunter
    Offline

    BolshevikHunter BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,265
    Thanks Received:
    273
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northern, CALIFORNIA
    Ratings:
    +273
    Yep, It's clearly C.ommunist N.ews N.etwork covering the madman Obama's (so-called anti-War) ass.
    The poor OP was hoping to bash The Military but ended up exposing this mentally deranged administrations hypocrisy and the filthy Leftist medias as well. ~BH
     

Share This Page