excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 18,445
- 35,071
- 2,290
Not long ago, in what is a seminal court case, involving Bill Clinton, the DOJ sided with Clinton.
Jack Smith, the buffoon that he is, ignored this in his vendetta against Trump.
Jack Smith, the buffoon that he is, ignored this in his vendetta against Trump.
In defending NARA, the Justice Department argued that NARA doesn’t have “a duty to engage in a never-ending search for potential presidential records” that weren’t provided to NARA by the president at the end of his term.
Nor, the department asserted, does the Presidential Records Act require NARA to appropriate potential presidential records forcibly. The government’s position was that Congress had decided that the president and the president alone decides what is a presidential record and what isn’t.
He may take with him whatever records he chooses at the end of his term.
Lawyer Who Lost Clinton "Socks Case" in 2012 Defends President Trump's Actions | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo
President Trump’s 14th Amendment rights are being trampled on. No, we’re not talking about the “insurrection” clause that the highly-partisan “Jan 6 Committee” of Pelosi’s 116th Congress likes to tout as an inhibition against President Trump being able to seek re-election, even though no Jan 6...
www.thegatewaypundit.com