On Global Cooling = YIKES!!

Discussion in 'Environment' started by skookerasbil, Mar 5, 2011.

  1. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    25,535
    Thanks Received:
    3,046
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +7,310
    Polar, West, Ian et. al..........a must read here..............geological evidence of abrupt climate change. This is a very historical analysis.......the kind of stuff the religion pretends is unimportant.

    http://myweb.wwu.edu/dbunny/research/global/looming-threat-of-global-cooling.pdf


    New stuff from Don Easterbrook at Western Washington University..................in depth look at temperatures in Greenland over the last 15,000 years and it is astonishing to see the temps before MWP as compared to now. Were very well headed to extended cooling.....based upon readings of isotope oxygen records = real science.

    The best is the "Mann" hockey stick graph vs. the "Reality" graph.
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2011
  2. percysunshine
    Offline

    percysunshine Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    17,964
    Thanks Received:
    2,378
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Sty
    Ratings:
    +7,377
    We are all going to die if we don't exterminate man from the planet.


    wait....
     
  3. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    49,434
    Thanks Received:
    5,813
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +11,990
    In which peer reviewed scientific journal was this article published in?

    None, because his graphs are dead wrong. His whole hypothesis is screwball. There is no way that this would ever pass peer review.
     
  4. edthecynic
    Offline

    edthecynic Censored for Cynicism

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,027
    Thanks Received:
    3,256
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,506
    Deniers have been claiming global cooling since the 1970s, see Time Mag., but it keeps on getting warmer. All these natural cycles that have been predicting cooling have been trumped by something that must be outside these natural cycles. I wonder what this UNNATURAL overriding cause might be??????? :confused:
     
  5. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    25,535
    Thanks Received:
    3,046
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +7,310


    geological analysis > computer models....................s0n. MWP has never been on the radar of the closed society of "real scientists". Why? Because it fcukks the whole model.:D:D:boobies:



    Of course it wouldnt pass "peer review" in a closed society.
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2011
  6. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    51,825
    Thanks Received:
    4,913
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +17,114
    Two things about Mr.Easterbrooks graph.

    1# It is NOT global, but just of the peak of the Greenland ice sheet.
    2# It ends in the 1850s...Of course it would be much beneath most of the past 10k years.:confused:

    Right?
     
  7. westwall
    Online

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    43,769
    Thanks Received:
    8,734
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +23,759



    That's a good overview. It also conforms to the predictions made by Corbyn and a number of others who's abilities i respect. What's fun is we are going to know for sure which side is correct in about 2 years. The last two winters here in the US have been the worst in 25 years and it is just going to stay that way.

    World Climate Report ยป Coldest Back-to-Back U.S. Winters in a Quarter Century
     
  8. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,381
    Thanks Received:
    1,089
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,560
    I think many people will look at Easterbrook's paper and say it is biased, that it strains the historic data to paint a picture of his beliefs. and it does.

    what many people dont see when looking at papers supporting AGW and alarmism is that the authors are straining historic data to paint a picture of their beliefs. and they do
     
  9. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    25,535
    Thanks Received:
    3,046
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +7,310

    And THATS the thing........anything scientific that is contrary to their model is rejected immediately and without consideration. In the world of science, "consensus" once stood for something.......it was the essence of science. Not anymore.
     
  10. code1211
    Offline

    code1211 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,999
    Thanks Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +845


    As is amply demonstrated by the debates on thi sboard and elsewhere, data can be tortured to say anything that the torturer requires be said.

    That said, the last graph in the attachment is the one that will tell the story. Did the warming plateau and will now start to receed again? Will the warming follow the predictions of the IPCC? For the former, we don't and can't know until some time passes. For the latter, we already know that they were wrong.

    For my part, I like the warmer weather. I'm pulling for the continued warming trend.
     

Share This Page