Frankeneinstein
Gold Member
they don't have to abide the results, in a free country they can make that demand...women should be heard...besides, if the vote count was legit there is no reason not to.Can't these women abide votes!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
they don't have to abide the results, in a free country they can make that demand...women should be heard...besides, if the vote count was legit there is no reason not to.Can't these women abide votes!!!!
OK, let's bring Jim Crowe back malaka.Nice try
Stare Decisis. [Latin, Let the decision stand.] The policy of courts to abide by or adhere to principles established by decisions in earlier cases. In the United States and England, the Common Law has traditionally adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law.
Do you know who warned us that the new conservative justices were not following Stare Decisis? Sandra Day O'Conner. That's right. A conservative judge appointed by Reagan. Even she knew what the right wing wackos were doing wasn't right.
Sandra Day O'Connor voted to uphold Roe v. Wade despite personal opinions on abortion
Sandra Day O'Connor believed government should have limited say over the most private decisions. She also firmly believed in states’ rights.www.azcentral.com
Roe v. Wade, the 1973 landmark case that legalized abortion, had been the law of the land for eight years. But it was under constant attack from the religious right — then as now. And because O'Connor was a woman who had presided over the Arizona State Senate when it decriminalized abortion, she was suspect, even though she declared her personal abhorrence for abortion.
"Too frequent overturning of precedent, she felt, undercut the court," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond.
Some justices wanted to overturn Roe v. Wade, notably Antonin Scalia, who would bring it up in discussion of other decisions, such as Lawrence v. Texas, which overturned state sodomy laws — that is, laws that targeted gay sex.
So it's no surprise to someone smart like me who's been wise to what the right wing has been trying to do since the late 70's. Not buying your bullshit.
The movement or the organization that's treated as a cash cow?He would have stood with BLM.
It’s rare they pass a law that takes rights away.OK, let's bring Jim Crowe back malaka.
Depending when you want to perform the abortion?
First trimester you have my solid support but after that it has to have a good reason and birth control is off the table for banning including the morning after pill…
Yes, killing innocent children in the womb should be illegal, Silly Boo Boo.Here is proof you are lying. Or that you've been lied to. Here are Republicans trying to make the morning after pill and abortion pills illegal. These pills are used very early on. So why ban them?
Abortion pills banned in Wyoming as Texas judge considers nationwide decision
The ban comes as a Texas judge considers revoking nationwide approval of a common abortion pill.www.bbc.com
Boom! Ya busted. Now stop lying to women. Tell them your end game is to make abortion illegal. It's murder. Right?
You're an excellent swallower.Here is proof you are lying. Or that you've been lied to. Here are Republicans trying to make the morning after pill and abortion pills illegal. These pills are used very early on. So why ban them?
Abortion pills banned in Wyoming as Texas judge considers nationwide decision
The ban comes as a Texas judge considers revoking nationwide approval of a common abortion pill.www.bbc.com
Boom! Ya busted. Now stop lying to women. Tell them your end game is to make abortion illegal. It's murder. Right?
Then tell the women in America that. When the Supreme Court thing happened you guys came out with all kinds of excuses and said you were not trying to ban abortion. That's not what the Supreme Court decision did you said. But I explained that decision was just one move towards an all out federal ban on abortion. Classifying it as murder. Which is weird because that's even more conservative than you were before Roe V Wade happened 50 years ago. You didn't believe that even back then. Suddenly abortion is MURDER in the 1st? WOW how far right you've become.Yes, killing innocent children in the womb should be illegal, Silly Boo Boo.
Butcher.Then tell the women in America that. When the Supreme Court thing happened you guys came out with all kinds of excuses and said you were not trying to ban abortion. That's not what the Supreme Court decision did you said. But I explained that decision was just one move towards an all out federal ban on abortion. Classifying it as murder. Which is weird because that's even more conservative than you were before Roe V Wade happened 50 years ago. You didn't believe that even back then. Suddenly abortion is MURDER in the 1st? WOW how far right you've become.
Women crushed you in 2022 even with your lies that you weren't and wouldn't try passing a federal law too making abortion murder. The Duke at least has the balls to admit to young women that's what they are trying to do. Young people crushed Republicans before they knew this. Now? Thank you!
Not me, women. I think it's 1,400,000 a year since Roe V Wade. Lock them all up!!! I never got an abortion.Butcher.
I told all you anti abortion liars that your end goal is to make abortion MURDER. That states rights bullshit I knew was a lie so I TOLD YOU SO!Get rid of leftist scum.