LogikAndReazon
Gold Member
- Feb 21, 2012
- 5,351
- 668
- 190
It's a progressive adolescents communist wet dream......Chomsky/Zinn style. it's all so revolutionary anti American !!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oliver Stone is brilliant, whether you agree with him or not. His movie, "JFK", is as close to the TRUTH about the JFK assassination as anybody will probably ever get.
"The Doors" was brilliant. "Born On The 4th Of July" was garbage.
I don't always like his movies, but I admire his passion.
It's a progressive adolescents communist wet dream......Chomsky/Zinn style. it's all so revolutionary anti American !!!
Oliver Stone is brilliant, whether you agree with him or not. His movie, "JFK", is as close to the TRUTH about the JFK assassination as anybody will probably ever get.
"The Doors" was brilliant. "Born On The 4th Of July" was garbage.
I don't always like his movies, but I admire his passion.
It's a progressive adolescents communist wet dream......Chomsky/Zinn style. it's all so revolutionary anti American !!!
Stones JFK was what turned me off on him while it was a very slick well made movie I have seen many interviews over the years with people who knew the main players and they all say the movie was more fantasy than fact especially the portrayal of Jim Garrison who many who knew him describe as a manipulative politically ambitious a-hole not the noble courageous character he was made out to be in the movie.
That is pretty much what I have heard.Stones JFK was what turned me off on him while it was a very slick well made movie I have seen many interviews over the years with people who knew the main players and they all say the movie was more fantasy than fact especially the portrayal of Jim Garrison who many who knew him describe as a manipulative politically ambitious a-hole not the noble courageous character he was made out to be in the movie.
I read books about Garrison way back in the 1970s. Even back then, no one claimed teh man had any credibility. General agreement was he was a disturbed individual who happened to hold a public office.
That is pretty much what I have heard.Stones JFK was what turned me off on him while it was a very slick well made movie I have seen many interviews over the years with people who knew the main players and they all say the movie was more fantasy than fact especially the portrayal of Jim Garrison who many who knew him describe as a manipulative politically ambitious a-hole not the noble courageous character he was made out to be in the movie.
I read books about Garrison way back in the 1970s. Even back then, no one claimed teh man had any credibility. General agreement was he was a disturbed individual who happened to hold a public office.
That is pretty much what I have heard.I read books about Garrison way back in the 1970s. Even back then, no one claimed teh man had any credibility. General agreement was he was a disturbed individual who happened to hold a public office.
People would tell me I had to see the movie to know what Stone was talking about...having been a bookworm as a kid...even with sex drugs and alcohol...I knew as much as Stone if not more. Kennedy stuff was huge in the Boston area back then.
Stone is a creepy feller who makes very few movies I appreciate, but the public likes his stuff.
go figure.
and Lee Oswald was a lone shooter
It's a progressive adolescents communist wet dream......Chomsky/Zinn style. it's all so revolutionary anti American !!!
Morons like you who argue with others who take Stone seriously as a historian need a lobotomy. You are all cut from the same cloth. Most normal people know Stone makes movies, not historical documentaries
It's a progressive adolescents communist wet dream......Chomsky/Zinn style. it's all so revolutionary anti American !!!