Obama's Blitzkrieg

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Let’s first dispel a myth. “Liberalism is back” or “The Era of Big Government is back” is nonsense. They never went away; so they can hardly come back. Just what the hell was happening in the past four years if not liberalism and big government. The Affordable Care Act wasn’t exactly small government conservatism.

Congress controls 95 percent of domestic policy, while the president controls 95 percent of foreign policy. Saying that Hussein is going to forget about foreign policy so he can focus on the liberal agenda is either a media scam or media stupidity. In fact, in the last few days I heard a few talking heads say that Hussein is going to concentrate on his domestic agenda. Nothing can be further from the truth. Hussein makes speeches, while Democrats in Congress write the laws needed to implement the welfare state agenda.

Moving on

The federal government is emitting a stronger than usual odor of something rotten. First there is this:


EIN GEDI, Israel – Chuck Hagel, President Obama’s nominee for defense secretary, sits on the board of fund that is the main financial backer of group urging the U.S. to join the U.N.’s International Criminal Court, which could prosecute American citizens and soldiers for “war crimes” and other offenses.
WND previously exposed Hagel serves on the board of the Ploughshares Fund, a George Soros-funded group that advocates a nuclear-free world.

XXXXX

The Ploughshares Fund has a long history of anti-war advocacy and is a partner of the Marxist-oriented Institute for Policy Studies, which has urged the defunding of the Pentagon and massive decreases in U.S. defense capabilities, including slashing the American nuclear arsenal to 292 deployed weapons.

Now WND has learned that Hagel’s Ploughshares Fund is a major financial contributor to something called the Connect U.S. Fund, or CUSF.

The group promotes global governance and states on its website its mission is to influence “policy through integrative collaborative grant making on human rights, non-proliferation, climate change and development, and effective foreign assistance.”

Hagel group urges U.S. to join International Criminal Court
Could expose soldiers, civilians to 'war crimes' prosecution
Published: 12 hours ago
by AARON KLEIN

Hagel group urges U.S. to join International Criminal Court

Just to be clear on this. The World Court (the ICJ (International Court of Justice), is the UN’s judicial system. There can be no global government without it.

I do not doubt that Hussein & Company will hand a piece of America’s sovereignty to the United Nations as soon as possible. Hussein will order it done. Hagel will do his part to carry out the order whatever that happens to be. I suspect that Hagel’s part will be substantial based on the responses Leon Panetta and General Dempsey gave to Senator Sessions.

If you watch the video don’t let the testimony about national security, use of the military, etc. obscure the things Panetta and Dempsey say in support of the UN’s “legal authority.” To give the UN’s judicial system the slightest bit of legal authority over the American people opens the door to accepting non-existent “International Law.”


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUhYX6Crsa4&feature=player_embedded]Def Secretary Panetta tells Senator Sessions U.S. military gets authority from UN or NATO.flv - YouTube[/ame]​

Here’s where the smell is coming from:

As in his first term, President Obama's second-term foreign policy is likely to lack a grand strategic vision and instead to react more to events in an ad hoc manner. The exception to this will be a continued focus on the Asia-Pacific region.

Unlike most second-term presidents, Obama is likely to focus on building his domestic legacy rather than an international one – 'nation building at home'. In combination with the domestic challenges that this administration faces – from austerity to the highest ever recorded levels of political partisanship – this will result in an America less active on the world stage, and one whose actions mirror its rhetoric of responding only to its vital national interests.

The Next Chapter: President Obama's Second-Term Foreign Policy
Programme Report
Edited by Xenia Dormandy, January 2013

The Next Chapter: President Obama's Second-Term Foreign Policy | Chatham House: Independent thinking on international affairs

NOTE: Asian-Pacific means Communist China. Hussein & Company are more than satisfied with the way things are going on that front. See this thread:


The question is why is the media preparing to turn the public’s eyes away from foreign policy? It ain’t because of disasters like the Arab Spring where Hussein overthrew friendly dictators in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood. Here’s the true answer:

The final push for establishing a global government is underway. The Internet is forcing the New World Order crowd to engage in a blitz out of necessity. More than seven decades of preparation and incrementalism will go down the drain if global government is not advanced beyond the point of no return in the next few years.

Giving the ICJ legitimacy is the first stage of Hussein’s blitzkrieg. Take this one to the bank. Hussein’s entire cabinet are dedicated to the same global government priority. Don’t look to hear that from talking heads.

Here’s the foreign policy agenda.

Either every country accepts a global government administered by the United Nations or they are on their own. “Administered by the United Nations” is the key component. In short: America will no longer help anyone unless it goes through the UN. Logically, that means the US military must be placed under UN command. That brings us right back to Hagel.

Finally, Hussein’s constituency is more than willing to handover America’s independence to their sick global village fantasies; so it’s only a matter of steam rolling the opposition. Hussein already has the MSM, but he is gambling he has the numbers necessary for his blitzkrieg to succeed without triggering a revolt.

UN-loving quisling prefer another ten or fifteen years to complete the softening up process incrementally, but as I said, the Internet is forcing their hand.
 
Thank you for an excellent article. I am going to send it to a friend to let them read it. Thanks. - Jeri
 
Whenever a Democrat says anything about not supporting the United Nations you assume it’s a lie. The next step is to look at the lie under a microscope ten times stronger than the Hubble Space Telescope. When it comes to Chuck Hagel’s response to the US becoming a party to the ICC one needs nothing more than a small magnifying glass to see the lie.

Move the cursor to 1:55:



Here’s my transcript of the important exchange:

Sen. Cruz: Now, I'd like to ask initially a point of clarification. With respect to the International Criminal Court, do you believe the United States should become a party to the International Criminal Court?

Hagel: Senator, may I quickly respond to your first comment?

Sen. Cruz: I'd like you to answer my question. My time is limited.

Hagel: That question is one that I am most likely not going to be dealing with as secretary of defense.

Sen. Cruz: It's a simple question. Do you think we should be a member of the International Criminal Court?

Hagel: I'm –

Sen. Cruz: Yes or no? I'm asking for your judgment on whether the United States should be a party.

Hagel: I support where the United States is today.

Sen. Cruz: So we are not a party today. You think we should not be a party. Is that a correct statement of your position?

Hagel: Yes. (I think he said “Yes.” Video is unclear.)

Sen. Cruz: OK. Thank you.

Senator Cruz did not pursue the issue; so Hagel must have implied he opposed US participation in the ICC. There’s the lie. Hagel knew damn well he could say anything at a hearing, but when the time comes he has only to remain silent when Hussein and John Kerry surrender to the UN’s judicial system. Oh yeah. Make no mistake about it. Those two have every intention of giving the United Nations as much authority as they can get away with. Why? Let me answer by quoting myself:

From the OP

The final push for establishing a global government is underway. The Internet is forcing the New World Order crowd to engage in a blitz out of necessity. More than seven decades of preparation and incrementalism will go down the drain if global government is not advanced beyond the point of no return in the next few years.

Giving the ICJ legitimacy is the first stage of Hussein’s blitzkrieg. Take this one to the bank. Hussein’s entire cabinet are dedicated to the same global government priority. Don’t look to hear that from talking heads.

Talking heads are fairly certain Hagel will be confirmed. Kerry, a known America-hater has already been confirmed. The best Americans can do in the next few years is learn what is coming.

Please read this column by Phyllis Schlafly. It’s about much more than Hagel. Here’s a small sample:


CUSF calls for massive slashes in our military budget so that U.S. money can be spent on “sustainable energy,” financing a “green stimulus” and combating “climate change as a security threat.” Other CUSF projects include urging U.S. troops overseas to wear the U.N.’s blue helmets, using the U.S. Armed Forces to take on the task of fighting “global warming” and “global poverty,” and stationing U.S. “peacekeeping” forces worldwide.

Why Chuck Hagel's the wrong man
Phyllis Schlafly notes nominee's commitment to global gov't, nuclear disarmament
Published: 7 hours ago
by PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY

Why Chuck Hagel?s the wrong man
 
Last edited:
obama and Kerry both consider themselves citizens of the world. Don't you think they want us all to be citizens of the world too?
 
There can be no global government without it.

Then it is lucky that no one - and I mean no one - is suggesting that we have global government.

Is it just me, or has the number of completely insane conspiracy theories risen since Obama was relected?!
 
I do believe his attack on second amendment rights is going to be his russian winter
 
obama and Kerry both consider themselves citizens of the world. Don't you think they want us all to be citizens of the world too?

To Katzndogz: First off, the title “Citizen of the world” is a smokescreen for what they are really after, and it sure as hell is not worth having if it means surrendering America’s independence to get it. They want totalitarian control for their own reasons.

Incidentally, the rich have always been citizens of the world for all practical purposes. Benito Mussolini (1883–1945) knew it as far back as 1921. He said the following in his first speech as a member of parliament. He was addressing the Socialists in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, June 21, 1921.


“We deny your internationalism, because it is a luxury which only the upper classes can afford; the working people are hopelessly bound to their native shores.”

We deny your internationalism because it, Benito Mussolini | Dictionary.com

Then it is lucky that no one - and I mean no one - is suggesting that we have global government.

Is it just me, or has the number of completely insane conspiracy theories risen since Obama was relected?!

To Saigon: You’re the umpteenth misinformed poster I’ve come across in 13 years. I did not mind correcting them. I do mind that not a one of them ever admitted they were wrong no matter what proofs I posted. Here’s a few of my favorites for you:

Consider this quote taken from a 1991 Bilderberg Meeting in Baden, Germany from none other than kingpin globalist David Rockefeller:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.”

“It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." -David Rockefeller-

New York Times Publishes Hit Piece Against US Constitution As FBI Demonizes Everyday Americans As Possible Terrorists
The Intel Hub News Brief
February 7, 2012

New York Times Publishes Hit Piece Against US Constitution As FBI Demonizes Everyday Americans As Possible Terrorists :

Next:

Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott for the Clintons came out of the closet in a 1992 Time Magazine article:

"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."

America Abroad: The Birth of the Global Nation
By Strobe Talbott Monday, July 20, 1992

America Abroad: The Birth of the Global Nation - TIME

NOTE: You have to be a Time subscriber to read Strobe’s entire essay.

Strobe Talbott’s voice is heard at the end of this brief video. Notice who precedes Talbott:


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=heegk07026I]Walter Cronkite receives "Global Governance Award" from WFA - YouTube[/ame]​

Talbott is now president of the Brookings Institute. He’s not the only global government advocate in high places who would hand America’s sovereignty to the United Nations.

Cass Sunstein’s and his wife Samantha Power are two charmers that served in Hussein’s Administration. Sunstein went back to Harvard in 2012, while Power’s is still there. Aside from Hussein, Biden, and his new cabinet she is probably the biggest threat.


. . . Kurtz calls Power “a patriot’s nightmare — a woman determined to subordinate America’s national sovereignty” to her own vision of how the world ought to work and what global role the US ought to play.

The ugly truth about Obama advisor Samantha Power
April 6, 2011 | Modified: March 16, 2012 at 7:26 am
Neil Hrab

The ugly truth about Obama advisor Samantha Power | WashingtonExaminer.com

More on Powers:

April 5, 2011 4:00 A.M.
Samantha Power’s Power
On the ideology of an Obama adviser
By STANLEY KURTZ

Samantha Power?s Power - Stanley Kurtz - National Review Online

Let’s go back to Cronkite and this telling excerpt from his acceptance speech:

It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace.

To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order.

Walter Cronkite accepts award. Global Governance/United Nations

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=inu9vKXsrFA]World Federalist Association - Walter Cronkite, NWO, WTF - YouTube[/ame]​

Bottom line: The American people never gave these people permission to give away something they do not own. AMERICA’S INDEPENDENCE

Oddball -

The UN does not "enforce" anything. It does not make laws. It is not a government.

To Saigon: NOT YET. That’s the point.

I do believe his attack on second amendment rights is going to be his russian winter

To Spoonman: That and amnesty for illegal aliens.
 
Last edited:
Flanders -

We have had the UN and League of Nations now for a century. During that time there has never been a suggestion by anyone that the UN should function as a governmemt.

It's just a fantasy - which is why the only posters here who agree with you tend to be semi-literate, poorly informed and wildly extremist.
 
Flanders -

We have had the UN and League of Nations now for a century. During that time there has never been a suggestion by anyone that the UN should function as a governmemt.

It's just a fantasy - which is why the only posters here who agree with you tend to be semi-literate, poorly informed and wildly extremist.

To Saigon: You are an incredibly stupid human being. If all of the people who are working day and night to establish a global government do not mean the United Nations exactly how do they intend to administer their government. At least the other fools I debated on this topic had the good sense to say nothing in the face of proof. You, on the other hand, completely shutdown whatever reasoning facilities you might have had.

In any event, I want to thank you for giving me the opportunity to post some facts. Hopefully, one or two viewers who had no opinion on global government now know what the Socialist sneaks are doing to this country.

Incidentally, are you so misinformed you believe the US was a member of the League of Nations?
 
When we liberated CAPITAL from obligations to nations, we opened the door for a one world government.

Love free trade do you?

Then whether you understand it or not, you welcome a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.
 
Flanders -

If all of the people who are working day and night to establish a global government do not mean the United Nations exactly how do they intend to administer their government.

There is no global government. There is nothing to administer. No one is working towards it.

It's a fantasy. Obviously.
 
There is no global government. There is nothing to administer. No one is working towards it.

It's a fantasy. Obviously.

To Saigon: Which one are you:

LooneyTunesWallpaper800.jpg
 
Flanders -

Actually, no, I'm one of the top journalists in my particular field. Good enough that I work globally, anyway. You've very likely read some of my work.

I have met a lot of UN people in my time, and work with politicians from around the world on a daily basis.

Never seen any sign of a spooky one-world government, though!
 
Flanders -

Well to be fair, it's difficult to imagine you actually read things like newspapers, because as all know they are written by the Illuminatti.
 
Flanders -

Actually, no, I'm one of the top journalists in my particular field. Good enough that I work globally, anyway. You've very likely read some of my work.

I have met a lot of UN people in my time, and work with politicians from around the world on a daily basis.

Never seen any sign of a spooky one-world government, though!

No place like hiding in plain sight. They live by that golden rule. Stop looking for it. It is right in front of you. - Jeremiah
 

Forum List

Back
Top