Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bork?!?! He was espousing a non-existent constitutional principle, i.e. original intent. He was pushing the lie that all the FFs had the same intent. He deserved what he got for polluting our political discourse, a pollution that's still having it's effects as evidenced by your post.You might want to research the R Senate votes approving Kagan, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Souter. Then compare that with what the Ds did to Bork. Then get back to me.
Yeah, I got that CNN Poll question on the Phone yesterday.
It went something like this, "Do you approve of the job the wonderful and gracious President Obama is doing or are you a racist bigot?"
What does racism have to do with giving Iran nukes? Or you still warm and fuzzy about gay marriage?
What does racism have to do with giving Iran nukes? Or you still warm and fuzzy about gay marriage?
Sorry deltex1, he has a history of posts...
As for Racism, Iran is not white guys... But no one is giving Iran arms...
Can I ask a question, The RW here want US to invade (over the last few years)
Iran
Iraq(again)
Syria
Pakistan
Yeman
So each deployment will take about 200,000 approx each (average number) and about $1.5 Trillion each...
So on that number, the US needs 1 million troops and $7.5 trillion. Conservative estimate.
This is to keep up with your present invasion plans...
Now you can go down the Nuke the lot of them route and every country in the world (apart from Israel) will cease trading with you and will find it very hard stop mass terrorism on the US. So that will cost way higher than the $7.5 trillion...
So could you please stop the comedy routine about invading..
Who said anything about invading Pakistan?What does racism have to do with giving Iran nukes? Or you still warm and fuzzy about gay marriage?
Sorry deltex1, he has a history of posts...
As for Racism, Iran is not white guys... But no one is giving Iran arms...
Can I ask a question, The RW here want US to invade (over the last few years)
Iran
Iraq(again)
Syria
Pakistan
Yeman
So each deployment will take about 200,000 approx each (average number) and about $1.5 Trillion each...
So on that number, the US needs 1 million troops and $7.5 trillion. Conservative estimate.
This is to keep up with your present invasion plans...
Now you can go down the Nuke the lot of them route and every country in the world (apart from Israel) will cease trading with you and will find it very hard stop mass terrorism on the US. So that will cost way higher than the $7.5 trillion...
So could you please stop the comedy routine about invading..
Yeah Bork was a RADICAL....but Ginsburg and the other leftists...well they are GREAT!!!Bork?!?! He was espousing a non-existent constitutional principle, i.e. original intent. He was pushing the lie that all the FFs had the same intent. He deserved what he got for polluting our political discourse, a pollution that's still having it's effects as evidenced by your post.You might want to research the R Senate votes approving Kagan, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Souter. Then compare that with what the Ds did to Bork. Then get back to me.
They must have know they were calling you.Yeah, I got that CNN Poll question on the Phone yesterday.
It went something like this, "Do you approve of the job the wonderful and gracious President Obama is doing or are you a racist bigot?"
So, five different references to gay sex in one comment. Pretty clear what you fantasize about.Nice, retort... Real Classy...
So you proved that you are a Bigot.
Do I have to look for the Racist bit.
Class? When replying to a scum of the earth dimocrap piece of filth?
Eat two dicks and take one up the ass.
Anybody surprised that the Lying Cokksucker in Chief is doing so well?
With the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media all but openly fellating him 24/7 how can he be doing anything else.
Talk about DISGUSTING FILTH ----
NBC Hack Savannah Guthrie Asks Ted Cruz If He Opposes Interracial Marriage…
Unreal.
Video at the link
dimocraps are the scum of the earth
At least they believe in something real, not fairy tales.Yeah Bork was a RADICAL....but Ginsburg and the other leftists...well they are GREAT!!!Bork?!?! He was espousing a non-existent constitutional principle, i.e. original intent. He was pushing the lie that all the FFs had the same intent. He deserved what he got for polluting our political discourse, a pollution that's still having it's effects as evidenced by your post.
And you believe Ds good Rs bad.At least they believe in something real, not fairy tales.Yeah Bork was a RADICAL....but Ginsburg and the other leftists...well they are GREAT!!!Bork?!?! He was espousing a non-existent constitutional principle, i.e. original intent. He was pushing the lie that all the FFs had the same intent. He deserved what he got for polluting our political discourse, a pollution that's still having it's effects as evidenced by your post.
Never? Let me guess...history was not your favorite subject in high school.I can't take a pool seriously, from a source that cites race relations as his strong point. This country has never been more divided.
Never? Let me guess...history was not your favorite subject in high school.I can't take a pool seriously, from a source that cites race relations as his strong point. This country has never been more divided.
So now you think you're a mind reader? You don't know me. I used to vote for Republicans all the time until the wingnuts drove out the ones with any sense, e.g. Clifford Case-NJ, Mac Mathias-MD.And you believe Ds good Rs bad.At least they believe in something real, not fairy tales.Yeah Bork was a RADICAL....but Ginsburg and the other leftists...well they are GREAT!!!Bork?!?! He was espousing a non-existent constitutional principle, i.e. original intent. He was pushing the lie that all the FFs had the same intent. He deserved what he got for polluting our political discourse, a pollution that's still having it's effects as evidenced by your post.
I don't know. Since you are typing your comments on a computer, I would have no idea if you stutter. You are, however, a fucking idiot if you think the nation is more divided now than, say, when we went to war with one another or during the 60's as the grandparents of today's conservatives fought any attempts to include African Americans as full and equal citizens. And, if you think this President is to blame for the vitriol and hatred directed at him from a small, but loud, segment of the population, you are not smart enough to be called an idiot.Never? Let me guess...history was not your favorite subject in high school.I can't take a pool seriously, from a source that cites race relations as his strong point. This country has never been more divided.
Do I fucking stutter? NEVER!
The only thing that would validate my point is if we were in a full out race war? You really can't understand context can you?
Give it break.So now you think you're a mind reader? You don't know me. I used to vote for Republicans all the time until the wingnuts drove out the ones with any sense, e.g. Clifford Case-NJ, Mac Mathias-MD.And you believe Ds good Rs bad.At least they believe in something real, not fairy tales.Yeah Bork was a RADICAL....but Ginsburg and the other leftists...well they are GREAT!!!Bork?!?! He was espousing a non-existent constitutional principle, i.e. original intent. He was pushing the lie that all the FFs had the same intent. He deserved what he got for polluting our political discourse, a pollution that's still having it's effects as evidenced by your post.
I don't know. Since you are typing your comments on a computer, I would have no idea if you stutter. You are, however, a fucking idiot if you think the nation is more divided now than, say, when we went to war with one another or during the 60's as the grandparents of today's conservatives fought any attempts to include African Americans as full and equal citizens. And, if you think this President is to blame for the vitriol and hatred directed at him from a small, but loud, segment of the population, you are not smart enough to be called an idiot.Never? Let me guess...history was not your favorite subject in high school.I can't take a pool seriously, from a source that cites race relations as his strong point. This country has never been more divided.
Do I fucking stutter? NEVER!
The only thing that would validate my point is if we were in a full out race war? You really can't understand context can you?
Bork was rejected by 58 42, with six Republicans voting against him. Ginsburg was approved 96 - 3. Bork had a history of being a Republican Political operative and was the Justice Department Official with the lack of integrity who fired the special prosecutor in the Watergate investigation, when the AG he worked for and his deputy refused to do so as it was improper. His views on the constitution were even outside the mainstream of conservative thought. He was rejected because because of those things. Ginsburg is a liberal, but in the mainstream of liberal thought. Comparing her to Bork is asinine.Give it break.So now you think you're a mind reader? You don't know me. I used to vote for Republicans all the time until the wingnuts drove out the ones with any sense, e.g. Clifford Case-NJ, Mac Mathias-MD.And you believe Ds good Rs bad.At least they believe in something real, not fairy tales.Yeah Bork was a RADICAL....but Ginsburg and the other leftists...well they are GREAT!!!Bork?!?! He was espousing a non-existent constitutional principle, i.e. original intent. He was pushing the lie that all the FFs had the same intent. He deserved what he got for polluting our political discourse, a pollution that's still having it's effects as evidenced by your post.
You posted your dislike of Bork, but are fine with Ginsburg and the other leftists. Anyone objective would not do as you did.
No. A rather large house. When do you assholes fire on Ft. Sumter?I don't know. Since you are typing your comments on a computer, I would have no idea if you stutter. You are, however, a fucking idiot if you think the nation is more divided now than, say, when we went to war with one another or during the 60's as the grandparents of today's conservatives fought any attempts to include African Americans as full and equal citizens. And, if you think this President is to blame for the vitriol and hatred directed at him from a small, but loud, segment of the population, you are not smart enough to be called an idiot.Never? Let me guess...history was not your favorite subject in high school.I can't take a pool seriously, from a source that cites race relations as his strong point. This country has never been more divided.
Do I fucking stutter? NEVER!
The only thing that would validate my point is if we were in a full out race war? You really can't understand context can you?
You must live in a fucking cave!
