gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 68,587
- 36,702
- 2,605
Wrong again. The study clearly showed it’s cheaper, then the lead researcher tried to deny it. Because after all, he was employed by the Koch Brothers. LOL.No, they didn’t. And the findings have been misrepresented according to the researcher.Wrong. The Koch Brothers commissioned the a study some time ago thinking they could prove your position. They proved Med4All would be cheaper. Makes sense right? The most expensive HC system in the fucking world, can’t be cost effective.No, it’s not. The figures they put out in support of it did NOT include all expenses. They were selective, to make it appear that way. And, studies prove them wrong-No. Med4All is cheaper than the outrageously expensive, terribly inefficient, and entirely unjust system we have today.Not only did premiums go way up, deductibles became sky high.
Taxes will go sky high under Bernie’s plan.
Several independent studies have estimated that government spending on health care would increase dramatically, in the range of about $25 trillion to $35 trillion or more over a 10-year period. Specifically, a study released over the summer by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University estimated it would cost $32.6 trillion — $3.26 trillion per year — over 10 years. For comparison, the federal budget proposal for the fiscal year 2019 was $4.4 trillion, the Congressional Budget Office states.
How much would 'Medicare for All' cost? Democrats' health care plan explained
The Cost of 'Medicare-for-All' - FactCheck.org
Did a study show big savings for Sanders' Medicare for All?
Don’t buy into the lies from the establishment. The entire western world provides HC to all it’s citizens, except for the USA. I guess we just aren’t smart enough...or could it be the .1% really like the huge profits they make off the current fraudulent system?