- Sep 16, 2012
- 61,031
- 54,982
- 3,605
Chasing the "undecideds" at this point seems sort of ridiculous. These people are either lying or are trying to go through life without ever making a decision. How anybody cannot know who or what they want in the White House at this point in time is beyond me.
As for the debate itself, I watched it on live stream here . I was happy that Romney got to some key points: Fast & Furious, Benghazi and Canada oil pipline to name a few. Obama was clearly lying, but who really expects otherwise? Next week's poll numbers (the real ones) should seal the deal for Romney once and for all.
Sometime being undecided is not about whether you like or dislike one candidate or another, it is about whether or not you are even going to vote or not. Sure, you are registered and have voted in the past four, five, six, etc. presidential elections, but you have become increasingly aware that your vote doesn't matter.
It is beyond you, because you are a victim of media conditioning. You believe your vote makes a difference, that who ever becomes POTUS, will make a difference in the direction of the nation, and the world in general. Ostensibly, this is not so. After the election, the debt will continue, the violence will continue, the joblessness will continue, the further consolidation of wealth into the hands of the top one percent, will continue. Corporatism, will continue. We have been given two candidates. It makes no difference to the ruling elites who wins.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk]George Carlin Doesn't vote - YouTube[/ame]
But it is so late in the game, our consciousnesses will probably remain most clear if we just stay home this year and not lend an air of credibility to this sham.
As a non-partisan voter, one has become acutely aware, that both parties are controlled by both the same big corporate interests in different ways. We also have become aware that the election process too, has become increasingly corrupt, by both parties. It is horrendously corrupted, it is awful, worse than Russia, worse than a tin pot banana republic or a tin pot dictatorships. The corporations, the Fed, and the two major parties would never allow the UN department on political affairs or third party observers in to monitor the elections. They don't want that. The only way to make sure that the elections don't "elect" exactly who the elites want elected, is if an overwhelming amount of people come out and support one candidate that will support real change. Nope, no one chance of that happening. Another possibility is that we overwhelming elect someone whom we know has plans to do something terrible, and then we protest, as a nation, exactly against what we voted the person into office to do. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?
The elites have positioned Obama to give the world an united one world currency. . . this is terrible for each sovereign state within the Union. There is no individual Californian, New Yorker, Texan, Floridian, etc., that would ever, knowingly vote for this. . . ever. Not if they were a patriotic American. But this is the elites plan.
The elites have positioned Romney to give the world a more united political structure through the initiation of WWIII through the threat of "weapons of mass destruction," and global annihilation, via an attack on Iran, which ostensibly will draw in Russia, China, India, Israel, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, etc., etc., No patriotic American would vote for this option either.
Choose and lose. Or stay out of it and absolve yourself of the moral responsibility of being party to causing the end of America.
Last edited: