Obama Supporters: How Can This Be???

[Soggy in NOLA]

It's all Bush's fault.

 

[hadit]

I just heard this fact....and had to check to see if it is true.

It puts Obama in a class by himself.
The dumb class.


1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth:

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." President Obama’s Growth Gap Hits $1.31 Trillion

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. "....first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth." Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire



What possible laurels can this perennial failure have left America as his legacy.



2. And....it AGAIN paints this fraud as a congenital liar:

"In a 2014 study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford University’s Robert Hall wrote about America’s sub-par economic performance. His opening line was basically a preemptive refutation of Obama’s claim – made during the State-of-the-Union Address – that the economy is strong.

The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression."
Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt



What the heck is wrong with you Obama supporters?????

The only comparison in history is with Hiroo Onoda.....

"Hirō Onoda(小野田 寛郎 Onoda Hirō?, March 19, 1922 – January 16, 2014) was anImperial Japanese Armyintelligence officer who fought in World War II and a Japanese holdout who did not surrender in 1945. After Onoda spent nearly 30 years holding out in the Philippines,..."
Hiroo Onoda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Come to the light, Obama supporters.....

...it's time.

Oh, come now. You know the drill. It's all Bush's fault and the poor Fragile One could not possibly have fixed the problem in <enter arbitrary length of time here>. In fact, the ONLY way the economy becomes the current president's responsibility is when the next Republican is elected or it grows by at least 3% annually, whichever comes first. At this rate, it looks like it will be when the Republican is elected.

 

[NYcarbineer]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Do you have reading problems, or math problems?

 

[hadit]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Now fuck off.

That's not what she said. Here's the money quote, and I put the important piece in bold.

By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery

There is a difference between "recovery years" and "never saw a year".

 

[Dot Com]

View attachment 61935

So next January we go back to two full blown wars in the Mid East !?

Thats what Rubio promises

 

[flacaltenn]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Do you have reading problems, or math problems?

Here is the claim made by InvBusDaily in the OP...

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery.

There is ONE "recovery year" under Reagan where GDP (final or not?) was 2.94%... If you WANT to call that "a lie" ---- have at it.. Recoveries are EXPECTED to run out 2 or 3 years. Because the first year in office, the new Admin is operating off the PREVIOUS Admin's budget..

This whole discussion is pretty petty.. Since what's happened to the economy is MONUMENTALLY historic and NOT influenced as much by politics as it is by Demographics and changes in the Globalization of labor and automation. Govt doesn't respond to earth shaking "work revolutions" like those very efficiently or quickly. And it will probably have to resolved over decades... Regardless of the partisan bickering over "magical powers" of their Pokeman political heroes...

 

[NYcarbineer]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Do you have reading problems, or math problems?

Here is the claim made by InvBusDaily in the OP...

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery.

There is ONE "recovery year" under Reagan where GDP (final or not?) was 2.94%... If you WANT to call that "a lie" ---- have at it.. Recoveries are EXPECTED to run out 2 or 3 years. Because the first year in office, the new Admin is operating off the PREVIOUS Admin's budget..

This whole discussion is pretty petty.. Since what's happened to the economy is MONUMENTALLY historic and NOT influenced as much by politics as it is by Demographics and changes in the Globalization of labor and automation. Govt doesn't respond to earth shaking "work revolutions" like those very efficiently or quickly. And it will probably have to resolved over decades... Regardless of the partisan bickering over "magical powers" of their Pokeman political heroes...

Reagan had a minus GDP growth year in 1982. Stop, please.

 

[flacaltenn]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Do you have reading problems, or math problems?

Here is the claim made by InvBusDaily in the OP...

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery.

There is ONE "recovery year" under Reagan where GDP (final or not?) was 2.94%... If you WANT to call that "a lie" ---- have at it.. Recoveries are EXPECTED to run out 2 or 3 years. Because the first year in office, the new Admin is operating off the PREVIOUS Admin's budget..

This whole discussion is pretty petty.. Since what's happened to the economy is MONUMENTALLY historic and NOT influenced as much by politics as it is by Demographics and changes in the Globalization of labor and automation. Govt doesn't respond to earth shaking "work revolutions" like those very efficiently or quickly. And it will probably have to resolved over decades... Regardless of the partisan bickering over "magical powers" of their Pokeman political heroes...

Reagan had a minus GDP growth year in 1982. Stop, please.

It's like I said -- 1980 doesn't count to "recovery" and 2 years is the EXPECTED length for any govt policies to have a real effect.. So 81, 82 and then in 83 --- it was over 7%, and then 5%..

It's silly to be expecting govt intervention to turn the economy around in just one or two budget cycles. And as I said -- this entire pissing match IGNORES the fundamental shifts TODAY in EVERYONE'S economy that are NOT addressed by govt policy tools of taxes and spending.

Obama should be defending himself ON THAT REALITY. The budget is being eaten up because the SocSec crisis came about 8 years earlier than estimated. And employment figures based on crappy jobs really does not reflect the steam that has been taken out of our economy today.

THe major screw has been applied to retirees who DEPENDED on economic growth and interest rates to fund their retirement. His continuing deficit issues are largely because of Social Security and Medicare not running surpluses but now DEFICITS.

And the retired are taking a HUGE chunk of dough OUT of the economy and spending it on pudding and Depends.

NO POLITICIAN is currently addressing ANY of those fundamental economic shifts..
Obama COULD --- but he would have to acknowledge the demographic shifts and the powerful redefinition of what a 21st century job really is...

 

[francoHFW]

OP- Duh- Our problem is lack of consumer spending, because of mindless GOP obstruction and defending to the death of pander to the rich policy DUH. See sig, dupes.

Frankie send me some dollars and i will spend it in spite of the GOP.....lol

50 degrees til Wednesday.

whats the coldest day the area has had this winter?.....

Like 15 as a high, once- usually over freezing at least.. The amazing thing was first measurable snow. The record was Dec 3. this year Dec 31st or so.

i can remember some pretty nasty days back when i lived there.....nothing like that lake effect snow...

Last year was the most amazing LE band ever- about 15 wiles wide, didn't move until they got 7 FEET lol. But Buffalo and we, right next to it, got nothing....

 

[ClosedCaption]

I just heard this fact....and had to check to see if it is true.

It puts Obama in a class by himself.


1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth:

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." President Obama’s Growth Gap Hits $1.31 Trillion

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. "....first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth." Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire



What possible laurels can this perennial failure have left America as his legacy.



2. And....it AGAIN paints this fraud as a congenital liar:

"In a 2014 study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford University’s Robert Hall wrote about America’s sub-par economic performance. His opening line was basically a preemptive refutation of Obama’s claim – made during the State-of-the-Union Address – that the economy is strong.

The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression."
Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt



What the heck is wrong with you Obama supporters?????

The only comparison in history is with Hiroo Onoda.....

"Hirō Onoda(小野田 寛郎 Onoda Hirō?, March 19, 1922 – January 16, 2014) was anImperial Japanese Armyintelligence officer who fought in World War II and a Japanese holdout who did not surrender in 1945. After Onoda spent nearly 30 years holding out in the Philippines,..."
Hiroo Onoda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Come to the light, Obama supporters.....

...it's time.

Look at the table and count how many years the Reagan annual GDP growth was under 3%

US Real GDP Growth Rate by Year

I count 3. 2 if you wish to duck out of 1981.

So who's lying?

Damn bro, You didnt have to drop the truth on her head like that

 

[francoHFW]

It's all Bush's fault.

Well, the GOP's actually, of course. Allowed 9/11 through sheer incompetence, the stupidest wars EVER, a totally corrupt GOP WORLD DEPRESSION, and now 7 years of mindless, racist obstruction and bs for the dupes like you.

 

[francoHFW]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Now fuck off.

That's not what she said. Here's the money quote, and I put the important piece in bold.

By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery

There is a difference between "recovery years" and "never saw a year".

Easy to recover when you triple the debt spending on defense and screw the nonrich with tax hikes...oh and a corrupt S+L bubble...

We could easily top 3% with a typical-for-the-situation infrastructure and training bill- but we can't do ANYTHING the black guy wants...GOP a-holes and dupes AGAIN. A disgrace.

 

[hadit]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Now fuck off.

That's not what she said. Here's the money quote, and I put the important piece in bold.

By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery

There is a difference between "recovery years" and "never saw a year".

Easy to recover when you triple the debt spending on defense and screw the nonrich with tax hikes...oh and a corrupt S+L bubble...

We could easily top 3% with a typical-for-the-situation infrastructure and training bill- but we can't do ANYTHING the black guy wants...GOP a-holes and dupes AGAIN. A disgrace.

Name one major Obama initiative the GOP stopped.

 

[Rustic]

I just heard this fact....and had to check to see if it is true.

It puts Obama in a class by himself.
The dumb class.


1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth:

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." President Obama’s Growth Gap Hits $1.31 Trillion

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. "....first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth." Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire



What possible laurels can this perennial failure have left America as his legacy.



2. And....it AGAIN paints this fraud as a congenital liar:

"In a 2014 study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford University’s Robert Hall wrote about America’s sub-par economic performance. His opening line was basically a preemptive refutation of Obama’s claim – made during the State-of-the-Union Address – that the economy is strong.

The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression."
Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt



What the heck is wrong with you Obama supporters?????

The only comparison in history is with Hiroo Onoda.....

"Hirō Onoda(小野田 寛郎 Onoda Hirō?, March 19, 1922 – January 16, 2014) was anImperial Japanese Armyintelligence officer who fought in World War II and a Japanese holdout who did not surrender in 1945. After Onoda spent nearly 30 years holding out in the Philippines,..."
Hiroo Onoda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Come to the light, Obama supporters.....

...it's time.

 

[jknowgood]

I just heard this fact....and had to check to see if it is true.

It puts Obama in a class by himself.
The dumb class.


1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth:

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." President Obama’s Growth Gap Hits $1.31 Trillion

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. "....first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth." Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire



What possible laurels can this perennial failure have left America as his legacy.








2. And....it AGAIN paints this fraud as a congenital liar:

"In a 2014 study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford University’s Robert Hall wrote about America’s sub-par economic performance. His opening line was basically a preemptive refutation of Obama’s claim – made during the State-of-the-Union Address – that the economy is strong.

The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression."
Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt



What the heck is wrong with you Obama supporters?????

The only comparison in history is with Hiroo Onoda.....

"Hirō Onoda(小野田 寛郎 Onoda Hirō?, March 19, 1922 – January 16, 2014) was anImperial Japanese Armyintelligence officer who fought in World War II and a Japanese holdout who did not surrender in 1945. After Onoda spent nearly 30 years holding out in the Philippines,..."
Hiroo Onoda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Come to the light, Obama supporters.....

...it's time.

corporations making more than ever before 68 straight months of employment gains ,,unemployment 5 1/4%, dow and nas risen from the dead that bush left and all this with republicans trying to tear america and obama down ,, great going so called patriots

14 million new jobs.

OK...ok....I'll help you out just this one more time....but you have to change your avi to the far more accurate "MatthewMoron"....m'kay?


"Report: 3 million more children in poverty under Obama, 22% of all kids
The report also explained that a lack of jobs or good income above the poverty rate of $23,624 was the reason more children have grown up in poor families."
Report: 3 million more children in poverty under Obama, 22% of all kids

Lack of jobs?? why not tell the repub congress to stop business from leaving america without blackmailing america into giving billionaires tax cuts?

You do realize the republicans has given Obama everything he wants? That's the problem.

 

[hadit]

I just heard this fact....and had to check to see if it is true.

It puts Obama in a class by himself.
The dumb class.


1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth:

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." President Obama’s Growth Gap Hits $1.31 Trillion

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. "....first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth." Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire



What possible laurels can this perennial failure have left America as his legacy.








2. And....it AGAIN paints this fraud as a congenital liar:

"In a 2014 study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford University’s Robert Hall wrote about America’s sub-par economic performance. His opening line was basically a preemptive refutation of Obama’s claim – made during the State-of-the-Union Address – that the economy is strong.

The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression."
Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt



What the heck is wrong with you Obama supporters?????

The only comparison in history is with Hiroo Onoda.....

"Hirō Onoda(小野田 寛郎 Onoda Hirō?, March 19, 1922 – January 16, 2014) was anImperial Japanese Armyintelligence officer who fought in World War II and a Japanese holdout who did not surrender in 1945. After Onoda spent nearly 30 years holding out in the Philippines,..."
Hiroo Onoda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Come to the light, Obama supporters.....

...it's time.

corporations making more than ever before 68 straight months of employment gains ,,unemployment 5 1/4%, dow and nas risen from the dead that bush left and all this with republicans trying to tear america and obama down ,, great going so called patriots

14 million new jobs.

OK...ok....I'll help you out just this one more time....but you have to change your avi to the far more accurate "MatthewMoron"....m'kay?


"Report: 3 million more children in poverty under Obama, 22% of all kids
The report also explained that a lack of jobs or good income above the poverty rate of $23,624 was the reason more children have grown up in poor families."
Report: 3 million more children in poverty under Obama, 22% of all kids

Lack of jobs?? why not tell the repub congress to stop business from leaving america without blackmailing america into giving billionaires tax cuts?

You do realize the republicans has given Obama everything he wants? That's the problem.

That is the correct motorcycle, and is a large reason for Trump's popularity right now. People are sick of the GOP elite acting like the French military.

 

[eddiew]

I just heard this fact....and had to check to see if it is true.

It puts Obama in a class by himself.
The dumb class.


1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth:

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." President Obama’s Growth Gap Hits $1.31 Trillion

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. "....first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth." Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire



What possible laurels can this perennial failure have left America as his legacy.








2. And....it AGAIN paints this fraud as a congenital liar:

"In a 2014 study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford University’s Robert Hall wrote about America’s sub-par economic performance. His opening line was basically a preemptive refutation of Obama’s claim – made during the State-of-the-Union Address – that the economy is strong.

The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression."
Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt



What the heck is wrong with you Obama supporters?????

The only comparison in history is with Hiroo Onoda.....

"Hirō Onoda(小野田 寛郎 Onoda Hirō?, March 19, 1922 – January 16, 2014) was anImperial Japanese Armyintelligence officer who fought in World War II and a Japanese holdout who did not surrender in 1945. After Onoda spent nearly 30 years holding out in the Philippines,..."
Hiroo Onoda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Come to the light, Obama supporters.....

...it's time.

corporations making more than ever before 68 straight months of employment gains ,,unemployment 5 1/4%, dow and nas risen from the dead that bush left and all this with republicans trying to tear america and obama down ,, great going so called patriots

14 million new jobs.

OK...ok....I'll help you out just this one more time....but you have to change your avi to the far more accurate "MatthewMoron"....m'kay?


"Report: 3 million more children in poverty under Obama, 22% of all kids
The report also explained that a lack of jobs or good income above the poverty rate of $23,624 was the reason more children have grown up in poor families."
Report: 3 million more children in poverty under Obama, 22% of all kids

Lack of jobs?? why not tell the repub congress to stop business from leaving america without blackmailing america into giving billionaires tax cuts?

You do realize the republicans has given Obama everything he wants? That's the problem.

I'll have to research that mr knowgood I was of the thought that republicans gave Obama nothing

 

[NYcarbineer]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Now fuck off.

That's not what she said. Here's the money quote, and I put the important piece in bold.

By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery

There is a difference between "recovery years" and "never saw a year".

Easy to recover when you triple the debt spending on defense and screw the nonrich with tax hikes...oh and a corrupt S+L bubble...

We could easily top 3% with a typical-for-the-situation infrastructure and training bill- but we can't do ANYTHING the black guy wants...GOP a-holes and dupes AGAIN. A disgrace.

Name one major Obama initiative the GOP stopped.

They blocked the background check bill that had the support of 90% of the American people.

 

[eddiew]

I just heard this fact....and had to check to see if it is true.

It puts Obama in a class by himself.
The dumb class.


1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth:

"...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." President Obama’s Growth Gap Hits $1.31 Trillion

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. "....first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth." Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire



What possible laurels can this perennial failure have left America as his legacy.








2. And....it AGAIN paints this fraud as a congenital liar:

"In a 2014 study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford University’s Robert Hall wrote about America’s sub-par economic performance. His opening line was basically a preemptive refutation of Obama’s claim – made during the State-of-the-Union Address – that the economy is strong.

The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression."
Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt



What the heck is wrong with you Obama supporters?????

The only comparison in history is with Hiroo Onoda.....

"Hirō Onoda(小野田 寛郎 Onoda Hirō?, March 19, 1922 – January 16, 2014) was anImperial Japanese Armyintelligence officer who fought in World War II and a Japanese holdout who did not surrender in 1945. After Onoda spent nearly 30 years holding out in the Philippines,..."
Hiroo Onoda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Come to the light, Obama supporters.....

...it's time.

corporations making more than ever before 68 straight months of employment gains ,,unemployment 5 1/4%, dow and nas risen from the dead that bush left and all this with republicans trying to tear america and obama down ,, great going so called patriots

14 million new jobs.

OK...ok....I'll help you out just this one more time....but you have to change your avi to the far more accurate "MatthewMoron"....m'kay?


"Report: 3 million more children in poverty under Obama, 22% of all kids
The report also explained that a lack of jobs or good income above the poverty rate of $23,624 was the reason more children have grown up in poor families."
Report: 3 million more children in poverty under Obama, 22% of all kids

Lack of jobs?? why not tell the repub congress to stop business from leaving america without blackmailing america into giving billionaires tax cuts?

You do realize the republicans has given Obama everything he wants? That's the problem.

Hope this is ok with mods
Brit Hume: Claim That Congress Gives Obama Everything He Wants Is "Utter Nonsense"

 

[NYcarbineer]

View attachment 61859

Nobody's lying. NYCarb... There are LOTS of true statements you could make about that chart.. ONE of them is that Obama is the FIRST in that chart not to have a single year with over 3% growth..

But that's a VICTORY.. Because leftists see an ever increasing economy as "unsustainable" and a BAD thing. It's a GOAL of leftists to reduce the growth of consumption and use of resources..

One of the statements I'll make is that the chart shows a clear lack of volatility or variance as time goes on. It's like a sputtering engine coming to a gradual silent halt.. You can see that in a graph -- better than in a table..

She lied when she said Reagan never saw a year under 3%. Now fuck off.

That's not what she said. Here's the money quote, and I put the important piece in bold.

By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery

There is a difference between "recovery years" and "never saw a year".

Easy to recover when you triple the debt spending on defense and screw the nonrich with tax hikes...oh and a corrupt S+L bubble...

We could easily top 3% with a typical-for-the-situation infrastructure and training bill- but we can't do ANYTHING the black guy wants...GOP a-holes and dupes AGAIN. A disgrace.

Name one major Obama initiative the GOP stopped.

Boehner refused to allow a vote on the immigration bill.