Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If your intention is not to protect the people of this country than you have absolutely NO BUSINESS BEING THE PRESIDENT OF THIS COUNTRY.
If your intention is not to protect the people of this country than you have absolutely NO BUSINESS BEING THE PRESIDENT OF THIS COUNTRY.
If your intention is not to protect the people of this country than you have absolutely NO BUSINESS BEING THE PRESIDENT OF THIS COUNTRY.
So while all of you on the left are cheering your new President in his effort to win his "World wide popularity contest"--one has to wonder what else he is going to release that would jeopardise the National Security of this nation!
Obama released these memos against the advise of 4 former CIA directors.
George Tenett a Clinton appointee who was a director for the CIA from July 1997- July 04 advised against this.
Leon Panetta, former Clinton white house chief of staff, CURRENT CIA director under President Obama advised against the release of these memo's.
He did it to appease the ACLU and move on dot.org and in so doing violated the trust of the American people and our Allies in this war on terror.
He sold us down the river for supposed political gain, and he has made a disastorous mistake in doing so. This will derail his agenda, a good thing in my view. However, he has put Americans at risk.
Liberals- there is no defending the defenseless, senseless move of this President.
So while all of you on the left are cheering your new President in his effort to win his "World wide popularity contest"--one has to wonder what else he is going to release that would jeopardise the National Security of this nation!
Calm yourself down little girl.
The fact that we waterboarded was well known before Obama released any documents.
Dick Cheney admitted we waterboared months ago. In public and on television.
So while all of you on the left are cheering your new President in his effort to win his "World wide popularity contest"--one has to wonder what else he is going to release that would jeopardise the National Security of this nation!
Calm yourself down little girl.
The fact that we waterboarded was well known before Obama released any documents.
Dick Cheney admitted we waterboared months ago. In public and on television.
Good point.
Cheney indicated the Bush administration doesn't regard waterboarding as torture and allows the CIA to use it. "It's a no-brainer for me," Cheney said.
The Seattle Times: Nation & World: Cheney confirms waterboarding
The national security outrage for divulging this should be directed to Mr. Cheney, who beat the Obama administation by a couple years on divulging this "top secret" information.
With Gitmo closing what will happen when terrorist suspects are captured in the future? Where will they go? Will Obama invite them to the WH for a chit-chat? After they are given a dish of coffee ice cream and are allowed to watch some tube, and the terrorists offer no intel - an dthey won't because they know this is all that will happen to them - will we just let them go? What happens when we get hit again? Will Obama merely turn the other cheek, Americans be damned?
Calm yourself down little girl.
The fact that we waterboarded was well known before Obama released any documents.
Dick Cheney admitted we waterboared months ago. In public and on television.
Good point.
Cheney indicated the Bush administration doesn't regard waterboarding as torture and allows the CIA to use it. "It's a no-brainer for me," Cheney said.
The Seattle Times: Nation & World: Cheney confirms waterboarding
The national security outrage for divulging this should be directed to Mr. Cheney, who beat the Obama administation by a couple years on divulging this "top secret" information.
You will be waiting for an eternity for the Bush lovers on this thread to express outrage that Cheney admitted in public that our government waterboarded, months before Obama ever released any documents
With Gitmo closing what will happen when terrorist suspects are captured in the future? Where will they go? Will Obama invite them to the WH for a chit-chat? After they are given a dish of coffee ice cream and are allowed to watch some tube, and the terrorists offer no intel - and they won't because they know this is all that will happen to them - will we just let them go? What happens when we get hit again? Will Obama merely turn the other cheek, Americans be damned?
If there is evidence they are terrorists, why don't they just try them and throw them in jail?
With Gitmo closing what will happen when terrorist suspects are captured in the future? Where will they go? Will Obama invite them to the WH for a chit-chat? After they are given a dish of coffee ice cream and are allowed to watch some tube, and the terrorists offer no intel - and they won't because they know this is all that will happen to them - will we just let them go? What happens when we get hit again? Will Obama merely turn the other cheek, Americans be damned?
If there is evidence they are terrorists, why don't they just try them and throw them in jail?
What jail? No one wants them. Gitmo was designed for this but now it's scheduled to be closed. And when the terrorists offer no intel (even when we know they have it) because they now know that nothing 'harsh' will be done to them, they just get released?
it's because no one wants them in their backyard. I will make a bet right now, Gitmo is not going to close because no one wants them. Their own countries don't want them back, they are troublemakers who are terrorists that kill innocent civilians. Americans don't want them in their prisons. It might have been a GOOD idea for Obama to have worked out the accomdations of these terrorists before announcing that he was going to close Gitmo. He is not a good proactive President, he flew over NY today with jet fighter planes and scared the Be-Jesus out of everyone.
Maybe he can put them up in a Motel eight near you.
it's because no one wants them in their backyard. I will make a bet right now, Gitmo is not going to close because no one wants them. Their own countries don't want them back, they are troublemakers who are terrorists that kill innocent civilians. Americans don't want them in their prisons. It might have been a GOOD idea for Obama to have worked out the accomdations of these terrorists before announcing that he was going to close Gitmo. He is not a good proactive President, he flew over NY today with jet fighter planes and scared the Be-Jesus out of everyone.
Maybe he can put them up in a Motel eight near you.
If there is evidence they are terrorists, why don't they just try them and throw them in jail?
What jail? No one wants them. Gitmo was designed for this but now it's scheduled to be closed. And when the terrorists offer no intel (even when we know they have it) because they now know that nothing 'harsh' will be done to them, they just get released?
We have gobs of them in the states. The maximum security pen at Levenworth would be fine.
I'm not in favor of releasing any terrorist, if they are terrorists. Convict them in a trial and lock them away.
Why should they release terrorists?