Obama retakes lead in rasmussen poll 46-45

[Conservative]

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™

first time obama has led in 3 weeks even though he has been rocked with bad news. ill take a guess and say roberts will make obama go up in the polls in the coming days.

oops.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows President Obama attracting 45% of the vote, while Mitt Romney earns 45%.

 

[Conservative]

Obama is also leading in every poll

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

Like I said in a earlier post you knew he would get a bump from the health care ruling now let's see if it last.

If that's the case, they should have plunged as the right wingers claim so many people hate the mandate. Obama's strong poll numbers show that the american people do support the ACA.

If the right wingers keep throwing a tantrum and go forward with their comical acts for repeal, the independents are going to continue running to the dems.

So, Obama approvals are below the percentage of people that approve of Obamacare, and that proves people support Obamacare?

Are you on crack?

 

[Old Rocks]

President Obama 3.6

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

President Obama 7.1 Governor Romney -0.3

RealClearPolitics - Obama & Romney: Favorable/Unfavorable

 

[Listening]

President Obama 3.6

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

President Obama 7.1 Governor Romney -0.3

RealClearPolitics - Obama & Romney: Favorable/Unfavorable

Noticed that you quit posting the elctoral map where it used to be 270 to 170 and it is now 221 to 181. That is a 60 point close.

Before the conventions. And Romney will win Florida, NC, VA, and MO.

Many agree that the direction of this thing isn't favoring Obama.

See you in November.

 

[blackhawk]

President Obama 3.6

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

President Obama 7.1 Governor Romney -0.3

RealClearPolitics - Obama & Romney: Favorable/Unfavorable

Noticed that you quit posting the elctoral map where it used to be 270 to 170 and it is now 221 to 181. That is a 60 point close.

Before the conventions. And Romney will win Florida, NC, VA, and MO.

Many agree that the direction of this thing isn't favoring Obama.

See you in November.

What people also seem to forget is for a good while Romney was getting hit with attack ads from his primary challengers and from the left as well while Obama was basically free and clear during that same time frame. It will be interesting to see how the Obama favorability fares now that Romney can focus all his attention on just Obama.

 

[AquaAthena]

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™

first time obama has led in 3 weeks even though he has been rocked with bad news. ill take a guess and say roberts will make obama go up in the polls in the coming days.

oops.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows President Obama attracting 45% of the vote, while Mitt Romney earns 45%.

Yes, they are even, today, according to Rasmussen. The Supreme Court is sure taking a hit though.

Public opinion of the Supreme Court has grown more negative since the highly publicized ruling on the president's health care law was released. A growing number now believe that the high court is too liberal and that justices pursue their own agenda rather than acting impartially.

Read more: Supreme Court Update - Rasmussen Reports™

 

[Black_Label]

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™

first time obama has led in 3 weeks even though he has been rocked with bad news. ill take a guess and say roberts will make obama go up in the polls in the coming days.

oops.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows President Obama attracting 45% of the vote, while Mitt Romney earns 45%.

Yes, they are even, today, according to Rasmussen. The Supreme Court is sure taking a hit though.

Public opinion of the Supreme Court has grown more negative since the highly publicized ruling on the president's health care law was released. A growing number now believe that the high court is too liberal and that justices pursue their own agenda rather than acting impartially.

Read more: Supreme Court Update - Rasmussen Reports™

Only the GOP thugs and their propaganda arm at Rasmussen would think something that stupid. We have one of the most conservative supreme courts in history.
The GOP also is showing again that they don't give a damn about the constitution, they just want the judges to vote party lines and that's it.

 

[clevergirl]

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™

first time obama has led in 3 weeks even though he has been rocked with bad news. ill take a guess and say roberts will make obama go up in the polls in the coming days.

oops.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows President Obama attracting 45% of the vote, while Mitt Romney earns 45%.

Yes, they are even, today, according to Rasmussen. The Supreme Court is sure taking a hit though.

Public opinion of the Supreme Court has grown more negative since the highly publicized ruling on the president's health care law was released. A growing number now believe that the high court is too liberal and that justices pursue their own agenda rather than acting impartially.

Read more: Supreme Court Update - Rasmussen Reports™

Even is bad for Obama the incumbent (also see his unfavorable numbers) not Romney.

 

[Sarah G]

President Obama 3.6

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama

President Obama 7.1 Governor Romney -0.3

RealClearPolitics - Obama & Romney: Favorable/Unfavorable

Yes, poor Obama and his winning numbers. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor and the numbers reflect that. All he has to do is get out the vote and congress will follow.

 

[clevergirl]

 

[Care4all]

taxes were mentioned several times in the Act....don't know why you all are pretending 'taxes' never being mentioned? Unless you can't read? How do you think you got all of your 21 tax measures in the Act, if they were not MENTIONED in the Act?

Just because you ''say'' Democrats never mentioned taxes in the Act or about the Act, doesn't mean you are anywhere near being honest...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

taxes were mentioned several times in the Act....don't know why you all are pretending 'taxes' never being mentioned? Unless you can't read? How do you think you got all of your 21 tax measures in the Act, if they were not MENTIONED in the Act?

Just because you ''say'' Democrats never mentioned taxes in the Act or about the Act, doesn't mean you are anywhere near being honest...

But obama said it wasn't a tax. he was very firm about that.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

oops.

Yes, they are even, today, according to Rasmussen. The Supreme Court is sure taking a hit though.

Public opinion of the Supreme Court has grown more negative since the highly publicized ruling on the president's health care law was released. A growing number now believe that the high court is too liberal and that justices pursue their own agenda rather than acting impartially.

Read more: Supreme Court Update - Rasmussen Reports™

Only the GOP thugs and their propaganda arm at Rasmussen would think something that stupid. We have one of the most conservative supreme courts in history.
The GOP also is showing again that they don't give a damn about the constitution, they just want the judges to vote party lines and that's it.

Hey idiot Rasmussen has obama leading romney right now. I think you've been to that thread.

 

[Care4all]

taxes were mentioned several times in the Act....don't know why you all are pretending 'taxes' never being mentioned? Unless you can't read? How do you think you got all of your 21 tax measures in the Act, if they were not MENTIONED in the Act?

Just because you ''say'' Democrats never mentioned taxes in the Act or about the Act, doesn't mean you are anywhere near being honest...

But obama said it wasn't a tax. he was very firm about that.

you mean the penalty? you're saying he believed the penalty for those who have to pay it is not a tax? So what? No biggie. The penalty is the same amount of money whether it is called a penalty or tax penalty. The rest of the bill had several tax measures in it that were all debated and discussed as tax measures....sooooo, it is no biggie that the penalty is called a tax penalty....it's not like America was not informed about all the taxes in the Act? Taxes were mentioned a gazillion times during the debates and in the Bill....so, seems to me, you all are trying to make some mountain out of a molehill....again!!!

 

[zonly1]

wait for the physical data down the streets performance but we can't forget 4 years of no budget by mao husein obama, prodigy for rules for radicals.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

taxes were mentioned several times in the Act....don't know why you all are pretending 'taxes' never being mentioned? Unless you can't read? How do you think you got all of your 21 tax measures in the Act, if they were not MENTIONED in the Act?

Just because you ''say'' Democrats never mentioned taxes in the Act or about the Act, doesn't mean you are anywhere near being honest...

But obama said it wasn't a tax. he was very firm about that.

you mean the penalty? you're saying he believed the penalty for those who have to pay it is not a tax? So what? No biggie. The penalty is the same amount of money whether it is called a penalty or tax penalty. The rest of the bill had several tax measures in it that were all debated and discussed as tax measures....sooooo, it is no biggie that the penalty is called a tax penalty....it's not like America was not informed about all the taxes in the Act? Taxes were mentioned a gazillion times during the debates and in the Bill....so, seems to me, you all are trying to make some mountain out of a molehill....again!!!

No biggie? Because it was ruled a tax made it "constitutional" If it had not been ruled a tax we would not be having this conversation. And that is a biggie.

 

[FA_Q2]

romney was a big mistake for republicans. why vote for a liberal when we already have a liberal?

It's like someone said that here already....

Oh yeah!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/220746-dear-conservatives.html

I am a bit more skeptical. I do think Romney's billionaire buddies can buy this election. However, it will be harder for them if Obama is popping.

Face it, the GOP picked Romney only because they thought he had the best chance of beating Obama. If it was about conservatism, Santorum or Gingrich will be your pick.

You screwed up in that you assume the rest of America is as obsessed with getting rid of Obama as you are.

Really, SANTORUM!!!

If it was really about conservatism, none of them would have made it anywhere near the presidency. If it was really about conservatism, Ron Paul would have done better than the lot of 'em. It really is more about making the government force people to agree with you, weather it is the right or left...

romney was a big mistake for republicans. why vote for a liberal when we already have a liberal?

he's hardly a 'liberal'. at best, he used to be a moderate.

the problem is that everyone else the GOP ran was horrible.

This. Romney might be terrible but who else would anyone pick???
The field was terrible because we all keep voting for the same terrible people year in and year out. That and we instantly discount anyone that actually lived in the real world because failure in any shape at any time of your life for any reason is unacceptable. Look at Herman Cain. He was not rejected because of his policies, no matter how bad or good they were.

 

[tinydancer]

romney was a big mistake for republicans. why vote for a liberal when we already have a liberal?

It's like someone said that here already....

Oh yeah!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/220746-dear-conservatives.html

I am a bit more skeptical. I do think Romney's billionaire buddies can buy this election. However, it will be harder for them if Obama is popping.

Face it, the GOP picked Romney only because they thought he had the best chance of beating Obama. If it was about conservatism, Santorum or Gingrich will be your pick.

You screwed up in that you assume the rest of America is as obsessed with getting rid of Obama as you are.

Really, SANTORUM!!!

If it was really about conservatism, none of them would have made it anywhere near the presidency. If it was really about conservatism, Ron Paul would have done better than the lot of 'em. It really is more about making the government force people to agree with you, weather it is the right or left...

romney was a big mistake for republicans. why vote for a liberal when we already have a liberal?

he's hardly a 'liberal'. at best, he used to be a moderate.

the problem is that everyone else the GOP ran was horrible.

This. Romney might be terrible but who else would anyone pick???
The field was terrible because we all keep voting for the same terrible people year in and year out. That and we instantly discount anyone that actually lived in the real world because failure in any shape at any time of your life for any reason is unacceptable. Look at Herman Cain. He was not rejected because of his policies, no matter how bad or good they were.

No offense, but here is the mistake in your conclusion . The GOP ran one candidate and one candidate only. Romney.

But he is the candidate now. We have to work from here. Many won't be happy that Governor Romney is the candidate to go against Obama, but at this point in time I would vote for a hamster that said he was an R.

 

[FA_Q2]

No offense, but here is the mistake in your conclusion . The GOP ran one candidate and one candidate only. Romney.

But he is the candidate now. We have to work from here. Many won't be happy that Governor Romney is the candidate to go against Obama, but at this point in time I would vote for a hamster that said he was an R.

First, I don't care who the GOP wants to run. The power lies with the people and their vote. We are where we are today because people are, in general, to damn lazy and have such a short attention span to actually exercise that vote. It is born out of the good times, people become too lazy to pay attention when they are well fed and happy.

Second, to the bolded part: as long as you are willing to vote for the hamster, you are going to keep getting hamsters. That kind of partisan thinking is why the GOP is able to get the guy they want and keep the masters in power.

 

[Claudette]

LOL Next week Romney will be leading in all polls.

The week after that Barry will be leading.

Polls are meaningless.