- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
The threat of ISIS is being greatly exaggerated. But why such exaggeration? I'll have to let people figure that out for themselves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Where have I supported the U.S. bombing ISIS, dope?So why are you supporting Obama's bombing campaign?Correct. We Liberals want the ME countries to deal with their own problems.Hmm loks like it's not going over well with his liberal wing:He is bombing in Iraq but not in Syria because he doesn't want to help Assad.Well NotFooledByW seems to believe Obama is acting decisivly by bombing. Both of you are Obama knee padders. So which is it?False. He is not bombing Syria. Which is why he said there was no strategy yet. They do not want to help Assad by attacking ISIS in Syria.One year ago the administration was touting Assad as a modern day Hitler and needed to be bombed.
Yet, today we are helping Assad by conducting air strikes on his rebel enemies.
Go figure...........
Got it now, dope, or do you need pictures in crayon?
Tell President Obama Don t Bomb Iraq CREDO Action
You wingnuts want to explode our debt again with another war.
Geez you're all over the map here. No consistency at all. Just like Obama.
I'm shocked that a guy who calls himself Sunni Man supports a group of radical Sunni terrorists!Correct .....So you are arguing that ISIS should not be attacked because it would help Assad?
Yeah, so ISIS can take Syria.Assad is the mad dog terrorist who needs to be put down. .....I'm shocked that a guy who calls himself Sunni Man supports a group of radical Sunni terrorists!Correct .....So you are arguing that ISIS should not be attacked because it would help Assad?
Actually. he is an Alawite.......which aren't even muslims.You just don't like him because he's a Shiite.Assad is the mad dog terrorist who needs to be put down. .....I'm shocked that a guy who calls himself Sunni Man supports a group of radical Sunni terrorists!Correct .....So you are arguing that ISIS should not be attacked because it would help Assad?
Nice try with the taqiyya, but I'm not falling for it. Alawites are mudslimes.Actually. he is an Alawite.......which aren't even muslims.You just don't like him because he's a Shiite.Assad is the mad dog terrorist who needs to be put down. .....I'm shocked that a guy who calls himself Sunni Man supports a group of radical Sunni terrorists!Correct .....So you are arguing that ISIS should not be attacked because it would help Assad?
Assad is for more brutal and blood thirsty than ISIS. .....
The choice between one mudslime and another is like the choice between being in the frying pan or in the fire. We just need to get rid of Isis and Assad, and Putin too while we're at it.Yeah, so ISIS can take Syria.Assad is the mad dog terrorist who needs to be put down. .....I'm shocked that a guy who calls himself Sunni Man supports a group of radical Sunni terrorists!Correct .....So you are arguing that ISIS should not be attacked because it would help Assad?
The West and several Sunni Muslim Nations in the region are to blame for ISIS. They funded & armed them. Putin warned that Assad was the safer play. But the West and especially Saudi Arabia, didn't listen. Just more tragic Blow Back.
Correct. We Liberals want the ME countries to deal with their own problems.Hmm loks like it's not going over well with his liberal wing:He is bombing in Iraq but not in Syria because he doesn't want to help Assad.Well NotFooledByW seems to believe Obama is acting decisivly by bombing. Both of you are Obama knee padders. So which is it?False. He is not bombing Syria. Which is why he said there was no strategy yet. They do not want to help Assad by attacking ISIS in Syria.One year ago the administration was touting Assad as a modern day Hitler and needed to be bombed.
Yet, today we are helping Assad by conducting air strikes on his rebel enemies.
Go figure...........
Got it now, dope, or do you need pictures in crayon?
Tell President Obama Don t Bomb Iraq CREDO Action
You wingnuts want to explode our debt again with another war.
. First, just because a pol doesnt use the word clueless doesnt mean that's not what he's saying.
. You can play semantic games all day long but when Democrats are criticizing the president for being too cautious, you know he's not doing the right thing.
Actually. he is an Alawite.......which aren't even muslims.
Assad is for more brutal and blood thirsty than ISIS. .....
Second, Obama knew all along about ISIS. You morphed the statement "We didnt know" into "The CIA didn't know." No evidence for that.
Feinstein does not see the President's Daily Briefing, where that information would have come out.
And if the CIA didn't know, why is that? Why are they so incompetent as to have missed a major movement?
You are a moron, like thats news.. First, just because a pol doesnt use the word clueless doesnt mean that's not what he's saying.
And conversely it does not mean it is what he or she is saying. So you lied and are now trying to hide behind semantics.
. You can play semantic games all day long but when Democrats are criticizing the president for being too cautious, you know he's not doing the right thing.
No. You are flat out wrong. We don't 'know' that Obama is not doing the right thing. That is a very stupid argument. The critics (McCain) here have demonstrated that they can be horribly wrong on military and intelligence matters very often in the past.
And further against your argument there, you have cited a report about too much caution on the part of the president. You failed to point out that your report also cited political support for the Commander in Chief's cautious approach.
So basically you are showing that you have no ability to objectively read a non-partisan balanced report and use what you read in your arguments.
You are a political hack working overtime to undermine US foreign and military policy solely for domestic tribal advances.
Well NotFooledByW seems to believe Obama is acting decisivly by bombing. Both of you are Obama knee padders. So which is it?False. He is not bombing Syria. Which is why he said there was no strategy yet. They do not want to help Assad by attacking ISIS in Syria.One year ago the administration was touting Assad as a modern day Hitler and needed to be bombed.
Yet, today we are helping Assad by conducting air strikes on his rebel enemies.
Go figure...........
We just need to get rid of Isis and Assad, and Putin too while we're at it.
We is We the People. We is the United States of America. We is Christians worldwide standing up for our ally Israel.We just need to get rid of Isis and Assad, and Putin too while we're at it.
Who exactly are the 'we' in your 'we need to...' admonition on Isis and Assad?
You don't present options for those two? But your ambitions for 'we' that casually tossed in getting rid of Putin too, shows that you are nothing but a typical Tea Party non-thinking political extremist and hack.
It cost us a couple trillion of borrowed dollars to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
Now we have a Tea Partier insanely calling for toppling the popular elected leader of the Russian Federation.
The Tea Party has gone nuts.