Democrats are no longer stuck in the mud due to Obama-Biden. CBS-NY Times polling ended 9/12 finds Obama better regarded better able to handle the economy among all potential voters, and even leading by a point among likely voters.
See page 20 in the actual results, if the linky-thingy goes near there.
Latest New York Times/CBS News Poll - Document - NYTimes.com
Only apparently better able is Romney to do something about the relatively insignifcant federal deficit--$16.0 tril. of $55.0 tril. of the Total Credit Market.
Mostly, since no one discusses the "new money" of modern markets, which is the credit market: Then someone needs mainly to ask, "Who is better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States? Is the vomit-sucking, pig disemboweling, all around credit market unfriendly Romney better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States? Is World-Class, Default-Avoiding, Free World Leader Obama better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States?
No one anywhere, of course, discusses the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly, economists do not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly, Nobel Laureates do not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly the Tea Party does not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Rep. Ryan is all about taking spending customers out of all the stores. Clearly, Repl. Ryan does not discuss the 'new money" of modern markets. The Romneys took one look at the "new money" of market economes: And decided to spread none of it around. They hoard it.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Great Chairman Bernanke now accepts even mortages as "new money" of market economies(?)! Anyone hopes to be able to ask, "What does he know, and when did he know it?! With credit, you meet its terms, or die!)
See page 20 in the actual results, if the linky-thingy goes near there.
Latest New York Times/CBS News Poll - Document - NYTimes.com
Only apparently better able is Romney to do something about the relatively insignifcant federal deficit--$16.0 tril. of $55.0 tril. of the Total Credit Market.
Mostly, since no one discusses the "new money" of modern markets, which is the credit market: Then someone needs mainly to ask, "Who is better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States? Is the vomit-sucking, pig disemboweling, all around credit market unfriendly Romney better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States? Is World-Class, Default-Avoiding, Free World Leader Obama better able to meet the credit obligations of the United States?
No one anywhere, of course, discusses the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly, economists do not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly, Nobel Laureates do not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Clearly the Tea Party does not discuss the "new money" of modern markets. Rep. Ryan is all about taking spending customers out of all the stores. Clearly, Repl. Ryan does not discuss the 'new money" of modern markets. The Romneys took one look at the "new money" of market economes: And decided to spread none of it around. They hoard it.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Great Chairman Bernanke now accepts even mortages as "new money" of market economies(?)! Anyone hopes to be able to ask, "What does he know, and when did he know it?! With credit, you meet its terms, or die!)