Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When Mohammed Zahir was caught, among his possessions was found a small sealed can marked, in Russian, “Heavy Water U235 150 Grams.”
According to the classified report, the uranium had been identified by Zahir “in his memorandum as being intended for the production of an “atom bomb.”
Zahir was not just another captured Jihadist. He was the Secretary General of the Taliban’s Intelligence Directorate and was in contact with top leaders of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. His possessions included a fax with questions intended for Osama bin Laden and he had been arrested on suspicion of possessing Stinger missiles.
But that may not have even been the worst of it.
Among the items was a notebook containing references to large sugar shipments to Washington D.C. Investigators believed that sugar was used as a code word for heroin. The Black Sea stops mentioned in the notebook are major hubs for smuggling heroin and for nuclear smuggling as well.
Not only was Mohammed Zahir a terrorist kingpin, but he was also a drug kingpin and the notebook suggested that his eye was on the United States of America.
It was no wonder that Mohammad Zahir had been rated as posing a high risk, but Obama had already freed a number of other high risk Guantanamo Bay detainees. Yet Zahir was the closest thing to a major nuclear terrorist in United States custody. Freeing him was wildly irresponsible even by the standards of a leader who had sacrificed thousands of Americans in a futile effort to “win” Afghan hearts and minds.
Nor did Obama even bother with the plausible deniability of releasing him to a South American country, the way he had with his previous batch of ISIS recruits, or at least to Qatar. Instead Mohammed Zahir went back directly to the battlefield in Afghanistan.
Obama couldn’t have done more without handing over the blueprints for constructing a nuclear bomb.
And yet it wasn’t surprising that Obama would free Mohammed Zahir. He hadalready freed Zahir’s old boss, the Taliban’s Deputy Minister of Intelligence, as well as another senior Taliban intel official under whom Zahir had used to work. It just happened to be Zahir’s turn.
If the other Gitmo detainees freed by Obama are deadly, Zahir was part of an effort to engage in the mass murder of Americans using weapons of mass destruction. Considering how many Gitmo detainees returned to terrorism once they were released, it is highly likely that Zahir will go on doing what he used to do and that American soldiers and civilians will end up paying the price for Obama’s license to Jihad.
Zahir wasn’t released on his own. Accompanying him back to the motherland of terror were Khi Ali Gul, who was linked to Al Qaeda’s Haqqani Network, Shawali Khan, the member of group that merged with Al Qaeda and Abdul Ghani, who had frequently bragged about his high rank in the Taliban and had participated in rocket and mine attacks on American soldiers.
These men were assessed as very dangerous. Like the last batch released, they’re almost certain to return to the industry of terror.
Even as a $5 million bounty has been put on the head of Ibrahim al-Rubaysh, a Gitmo terrorist released for rest and rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia, the same mistakes that led to his release continue to be made.
Ibrahim al-Rubaysh returned to play a leading role in Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Mohammed Zahir and his pals will have an even shorter trip to get back into the fight. They won’t even have to go through the charade of being rehabilitated before they return to their bloody trade.
With the release of the latest batch of Taliban figures, Obama is helping the Taliban rebuild its organizational structure at the top. Even while he’s declaring victory over the Taliban, he is helping the Taliban win.
And in the process he is sending dangerous men back into the fight. Men like Mohammed Zahir.
I hope that fuck gets the first nuke up his asshole.The son of a bitch wants the USofA destroyed. That is his ONLY remaining goal in his lame duck presidency...EXCEPT for 8 or 9 more 18 day family vacations at OUR EXPENSE.
I hope that fuck gets the first nuke up his asshole.The son of a bitch wants the USofA destroyed. That is his ONLY remaining goal in his lame duck presidency...EXCEPT for 8 or 9 more 18 day family vacations at OUR EXPENSE.
No, just their boss.Yea I guess the President, CIA, FBI, homeland Security, and the military are all a bunch of retards. We should be nuked any second now.
No, just their boss.Yea I guess the President, CIA, FBI, homeland Security, and the military are all a bunch of retards. We should be nuked any second now.
Might have been.With such damning evidence, it must have been a cake walk to convict the guy.
So how many years did he get as part of his trial?
Might have been.With such damning evidence, it must have been a cake walk to convict the guy.
So how many years did he get as part of his trial?
We don't try them though so that really is a moot point right now. Perhaps Obama should restart the trials that he started 6 years ago.
Have to wait until the muslim's out of office.Just do it and get it over with. Give us a reason to blow up the entire middle east to ash.
What crime did he commit? NO crime at all.With such damning evidence, it must have been a cake walk to convict the guy.
So how many years did he get as part of his trial?
We don't try them because that is virtually impossible when these people were captured on the battlefield.Might have been.With such damning evidence, it must have been a cake walk to convict the guy.
So how many years did he get as part of his trial?
We don't try them though so that really is a moot point right now. Perhaps Obama should restart the trials that he started 6 years ago.
Why don't we try them? Our laws mandate that we do. Our constitution mandates it. By any semblance of our own values and legal system, the only circumstance where someone should be in prison for 10 years is when they've been sentenced to it after a conviction for a criminal offense.
So what was he convicted of?
Try them for what? Guilty of what? They are POWs. You dont try POWs. You hold them until hostilities are over.We don't try them because that is virtually impossible when these people were captured on the battlefield.Might have been.With such damning evidence, it must have been a cake walk to convict the guy.
So how many years did he get as part of his trial?
We don't try them though so that really is a moot point right now. Perhaps Obama should restart the trials that he started 6 years ago.
Why don't we try them? Our laws mandate that we do. Our constitution mandates it. By any semblance of our own values and legal system, the only circumstance where someone should be in prison for 10 years is when they've been sentenced to it after a conviction for a criminal offense.
So what was he convicted of?
I think we should try them in some manner that way we can point to an affirmative of guilt or not. It would make this process so much simpler but there are complications involved. Obama pushed hard for this to occur and then totally forgot about it.
Terrorist actions. You can get charged with committing terrorist actions or making terrorist threats even here on the states.Try them for what? Guilty of what? They are POWs. You dont try POWs. You hold them until hostilities are over.We don't try them because that is virtually impossible when these people were captured on the battlefield.Might have been.With such damning evidence, it must have been a cake walk to convict the guy.
So how many years did he get as part of his trial?
We don't try them though so that really is a moot point right now. Perhaps Obama should restart the trials that he started 6 years ago.
Why don't we try them? Our laws mandate that we do. Our constitution mandates it. By any semblance of our own values and legal system, the only circumstance where someone should be in prison for 10 years is when they've been sentenced to it after a conviction for a criminal offense.
So what was he convicted of?
I think we should try them in some manner that way we can point to an affirmative of guilt or not. It would make this process so much simpler but there are complications involved. Obama pushed hard for this to occur and then totally forgot about it.
Your president just put the rest of us at risk for nuclear attack, so it is fitting he's the first when that prisoner builds his dirty bomb. That fucker has shown he isn't interested in the safety of the public.I hope that fuck gets the first nuke up his asshole.The son of a bitch wants the USofA destroyed. That is his ONLY remaining goal in his lame duck presidency...EXCEPT for 8 or 9 more 18 day family vacations at OUR EXPENSE.
Hmm a conservative just hoped a nuclear bomb gets dropped on our President. Our lack of surprise should be telling.
we don't' give foreign terrorist constitutional rights. Obama screwed up the military tribunal process that was in place . Obama and his terrorist lawyer attorney general Eric HoderMight have been.With such damning evidence, it must have been a cake walk to convict the guy.
So how many years did he get as part of his trial?
We don't try them though so that really is a moot point right now. Perhaps Obama should restart the trials that he started 6 years ago.
Why don't we try them? Our laws mandate that we do. Our constitution mandates it. By any semblance of our own values and legal system, the only circumstance where someone should be in prison for 10 years is when they've been sentenced to it after a conviction for a criminal offense.
So what was he convicted of?
He did when he started demanding that the trials be in open court here in the states when they weren't equipped for it.we don't' give foreign terrorist constitutional rights. Obama screwed up the military tribunal process that was in place . Obama and his terrorist lawyer attorney general Eric HoderMight have been.With such damning evidence, it must have been a cake walk to convict the guy.
So how many years did he get as part of his trial?
We don't try them though so that really is a moot point right now. Perhaps Obama should restart the trials that he started 6 years ago.
Why don't we try them? Our laws mandate that we do. Our constitution mandates it. By any semblance of our own values and legal system, the only circumstance where someone should be in prison for 10 years is when they've been sentenced to it after a conviction for a criminal offense.
So what was he convicted of?
