Yes, it's a quagmire of booby-trapped conclusions...Arming the Kurds would also provoke the Shia militias into attacking US interests in the region.“Some of America’s closest allies say President Barack Obama and other Western leaders, including David Cameron, are failing to show strategic leadership over the world’s gravest security crisis for decades.
Yet one can't deny that Iraq wants no arming of the rebels only Shia..
The Iraq govt. doesn't want the heavy weapons given to Sunni militias, have you ever heard of them? Iraq?I can't help but notice the OP failed to mention the Senate voted down a measure to provide arms directly to the Kurds in June.
You see, it is ILLEGAL for Obama to provide arms directly to the Kurds. He is required by law to only provide arms to recognized sovereign governemnts.
I know how much you faux raging, fake scandalizers care about Obama doing things legally. You're constantly moaning how he is violating the Constitution and stuff, and here he is abiding by it, and you STILL complain.
Hypocrites.
And as always the irony impaired far left drones do not read what is posted..
The United States has blocked attempts by its Middle East allies to fly heavy weapons directly to the Kurds fighting Islamic State jihadists in Iraq,
US blocks attempts by Arab allies to fly heavy weapons directly to Kurds to fight Islamic State - Telegraph
Not sure how the far left can blame the senate for blocking other countries..
But leave it to the far left drones to trout out the "hate" of anything not far left..