They released a statement after attorney Bennett, who has come off like nothing less than a dishonest ambulance chasing attorney screaming to let his client speak and they let her and she refuses, then when questioned he CAN'T remember anything about it NOTHING! His actions are what makes people not trust attorneys.
Summary:
Funny how when a liberal or a islamofacist has a story publish, the left say don't jump to conclusions, innocent until proven guilt. Yet even when it more and more likely that this was nothing more than either a fabrication in order to get money or an over-sensitive person complaining about a non-sexual gesture she took the wrong way and the company wanting to put it AND HER behind them.
Summary:
- Accuser filed an internal complaint.
- Cain denied it, because it was a fabrication.
- They signed an agreement with the so-called accuser and then paid her a SEVERANCE pay, NOT a settlement pay!
- The agreement DID NOT include ANY admission of guilt.
- Cain wasn't party to the agreement (since he would have been against agreeing with a slanderous gold-digger).
- They signed a MUTUAL confidentiality Agreement, meaning both the lying accuser and NRA has a duty to confidentiality.
- They agree to release her from her confidentiality commitment AND THE SO-CALLED ACCUSERS REFUSES TO SPEAK! THAT IS AN ADMISSION OF HER DISHONESTY!
Funny how when a liberal or a islamofacist has a story publish, the left say don't jump to conclusions, innocent until proven guilt. Yet even when it more and more likely that this was nothing more than either a fabrication in order to get money or an over-sensitive person complaining about a non-sexual gesture she took the wrong way and the company wanting to put it AND HER behind them.
Here's The National Restaurant Association's Statement On The Cain Scandal
"We have seen the statement Joel Bennett released earlier today on behalf of his client, a former employee of the Association. The Association consented to the release of that statement, at the request of Mr. Bennetts client.
Based upon the information currently available, we can confirm that more than a decade ago, in July 1999, Mr. Bennetts client filed a formal internal complaint, in accordance with the Associations existing policies prohibiting discrimination and harassment. Mr. Herman Cain disputed the allegations in the complaint. The Association and Mr. Bennetts client subsequently entered into an agreement to resolve the matter, without any admission of liability. Mr. Cain was not a party to that agreement. The agreement contains mutual confidentiality obligations. Notwithstanding the Associations ongoing policy of maintaining the privacy of all personnel matters, we have advised Mr. Bennett that we are willing to waive the confidentiality of this matter and permit Mr. Bennetts client to comment. As indicated in Mr. Bennetts statement, his client prefers not to be further involved with this matter and we will respect her decision."
The Association has robust policies designed to ensure that employees with concerns may bring them forward for prompt investigation and resolution, without risk of retaliation. The Association is fully committed to equal employment opportunity and to an environment that is free from any discrimination or harassment.
Read more: Here's The National Restaurant Association's Statement On The Cain Scandal