Now the Trump admin wants to bypass Congress

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Penelope, Jul 31, 2018.

  1. Penelope
    Offline

    Penelope Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    31,121
    Thanks Received:
    2,769
    Trophy Points:
    1,145
    Ratings:
    +14,783
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Tipsycatlover
    Online

    Tipsycatlover Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    23,349
    Thanks Received:
    4,121
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +28,837
    if the poor get a tax cut, if at all, it is very small. They pay very little in taxes and cannot get any kind of substantial tax cut.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. JGalt
    Offline

    JGalt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    12,006
    Thanks Received:
    2,557
    Trophy Points:
    380
    Location:
    North
    Ratings:
    +17,111
    Why not give a tax cut to those who pay in most of the taxes, and who are the job creators?

    I have no class envy against anyone who's been successful, and I've never been given a job by a poor person.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. Tipsycatlover
    Online

    Tipsycatlover Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    23,349
    Thanks Received:
    4,121
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +28,837
    Each and every day, 10 men go to a restaurant for dinner together. The bill for all 10 comes to $100 each day. If the bill were paid the way we pay our taxes, the first four would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1; the sixth would pay $3; the seventh $7; the eighth $12; the ninth $18. The 10th man – the richest – would pay $59. Although the 10 men didn't share the bill equally, they all seemed content enough with the arrangement – until the restaurant owner threw them a curve.


    "You're all very good customers," the owner said, "so I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20. I'm going to charge you just $80 in total." The 10 men looked at each other and seemed genuinely surprised, but quite happy about the news.

    The first four men, of course, are unaffected because they weren't paying anything for their meals anyway. They'll still eat for free. The big question is how to divvy up the $20 in savings among the remaining six in a way that's fair for each of them. They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33, but if they subtract that amount from each person's share, then the fifth and sixth men would end up being paid to eat their meals. The restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each person's bill by roughly the same percentage, and he proceeded to work out the amounts that each should pay.


    The results? The fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in $2, the seventh paid $5, the eighth paid $9, the ninth paid $14, leaving the 10th man with a bill of $50 instead of $59. Outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got one dollar out of the $20," said the sixth man, pointing to the 10th man, "and he got $9!" "Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too! It's not fair that he got nine times more than me!" "That's true," shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get back $9 when I only got $2? The rich get all the breaks!" "Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

    The nine outraged men surrounded the 10th and brutally assaulted him. The next day, he didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they faced a problem that they hadn't faced before. They were $50 short.

    The moral

    There are a couple of lessons to be learned here. The first is an observation: If the 10 individuals had been women, they probably would have figured things out. But in all seriousness, I'm going to suggest that the approach taken by the restaurant owner in the story is exactly the right approach to divvying up tax cuts. It's how our system should work. The people who pay the highest taxes should get the greatest relief from a tax cut, in absolute dollars.

    The fact is, if you overtax the rich, they just might not show up for dinner next time. After all, there are plenty of good restaurants around the world.

    This story is relevant today because both the Conservatives and the Liberals have proposed to cut taxes – in different ways. The Liberals have said that they would offer no tax cuts to the rich, but would instead increase the tax burden on the highest earners. The problem with this, of course, is that pushing any taxpayer's marginal tax rate to 50 per cent or higher (which would be the case for many Canadians, particularly in provinces that also have taken steps to increase the marginal tax rate for the highest earners) will absolutely cause those folks to explore new ways to bring the tax burden down. And in the end, it may drive some to leave.

    Tim Cestnick is managing director of Advanced Wealth Planning, Scotiabank Global Wealth Management, and founder of WaterStreet Family Offices.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. BlackFlag
    Online

    BlackFlag I haz hoisted it!

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2014
    Messages:
    12,064
    Thanks Received:
    1,081
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    3 sheets to the wind, so to speak
    Ratings:
    +8,083
    Good little peasant :itsok:
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  6. MarcATL
    Online

    MarcATL Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    19,278
    Thanks Received:
    3,029
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,470
    All the rightwing talking points, all at once.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Pete7469
    Offline

    Pete7469 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    16,843
    Thanks Received:
    3,530
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    The Real World
    Ratings:
    +19,964
    Funny...

    When the meat puppet faggot went around congress with his pen and phone bed wetters insisted it was OK.


    .
     
  8. Tipsycatlover
    Online

    Tipsycatlover Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    23,349
    Thanks Received:
    4,121
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +28,837
    are you really so outlandishly ignorant that you actually believe that the poor can get a meaningful tax cut? Really? They can't and never could.
     
  9. Tipsycatlover
    Online

    Tipsycatlover Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2016
    Messages:
    23,349
    Thanks Received:
    4,121
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +28,837
    On what basis do you believe that the poor who pay no or very little in taxes can get a substantial tax cut?
     
  10. Indeependent
    Offline

    Indeependent Platinum Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    30,235
    Thanks Received:
    2,595
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Ratings:
    +15,425
    All Tax Cuts should have time limits and be contingent upon how they help Americans.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page