North Korea and why Iran wants the bomb......

Discussion in 'Politics' started by geauxtohell, Aug 15, 2011.

  1. geauxtohell
    Offline

    geauxtohell Choose your weapon.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    15,125
    Thanks Received:
    2,153
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Out here in the middle.
    Ratings:
    +2,155
    It's no secret. Iran wants the bomb. However, despite the what the saber rattlers (on both sides) say, it's not to destroy Israel. Iran leaders and the Mullahcracy are smart enough to know that any strike against Israel would spell their doom. The current regime would lose any support they have from Russia and others and they would be systematically dismantled by a multinational coalition of forces. And virtually every American (to include myself) would support that, even though it would ensure another 10 year counter insurgency effort. We are extremely effective at destroying governmental infrastructure and removing leadership (and less adept at fighting the counterinsurgency).

    Instead, Iran wants the bomb for one reason alone: it makes them invasion proof. After watching us invade two of their neighbors in the last decade and seeing us on both of their flanks, their paranoia is somewhat understandable. The day Iran announces they have the bomb is the day invasion pragmatically goes off the table.

    As evidence of this, look at North Korea. Perhaps the most obnoxious rogue nation in the "Axis of Evil". We never even threaten invasion. Why? N. Korea has the bomb and Soul is within lobbing distance.

    Something to keep in mind in the upcoming election as the GOP field (and perhaps even Obama) will become more hawkish over Iran.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. Paulie
    Offline

    Paulie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    31,569
    Thanks Received:
    4,854
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +15,417
    Exactly.

    They'd use it as a last ditch move in the event that we invaded them, because what would they have to lose at that point.

    It's easier to portray them as lunatics who'd prefer to initiate their own destruction by merely sending one lousy missile though.
     
  3. Full-Auto
    Offline

    Full-Auto Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    13,555
    Thanks Received:
    1,614
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +1,615
    :finger3: Thats for the avatar


    Youre right of course. Or at least I agree with your premise. Well done sir.
     
  4. geauxtohell
    Offline

    geauxtohell Choose your weapon.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    15,125
    Thanks Received:
    2,153
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Out here in the middle.
    Ratings:
    +2,155
    Well thanks.
     
  5. Two Thumbs
    Offline

    Two Thumbs Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    33,450
    Thanks Received:
    5,786
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Where ever I go, there I am.
    Ratings:
    +11,589
    That's more than likely the case.

    Except 12vers are in charge of things and these kooks are suicidal and want to bring about armagedden [-1sp]


    Hope for the best, prepare for the worst
     
  6. geauxtohell
    Offline

    geauxtohell Choose your weapon.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    15,125
    Thanks Received:
    2,153
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Out here in the middle.
    Ratings:
    +2,155
    I am sorry, but I just don't believe that to be the case. I think every leader (or cabal of leaders) wants one thing above all others, to hold onto their power. We are very good at eliminating government. Iran knows that.

    The problem with "hope for the best, prepare for the worst" is that it leads to this insane policy of "pre-emptive war".
     
  7. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    Exactly right about Iran.

    Sorta wrong about North Korea. North Korea has nothing. No wants anything from them. They are having trouble just keeping a population in their country. Everyone wants to leave.
     
  8. Patrick2
    Offline

    Patrick2 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,576
    Thanks Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +104
    Another exercize in illogic from our resident Gigglemeister. :D Exactly who would invade Iran, since the perfectly positioned and armed Iraq tried and failed in the 1980s? And why would the US invade Iran? Does ANYBODY really believe the US would do that, after being exhausted by two wars in the region? Further, it wouldn't make them "invasion proof" by anyone with nukes - if they used it on that occasion, they'd be committing national suicide as opposed to losing a war.

    Try again sparky. :lol:
     
  9. geauxtohell
    Offline

    geauxtohell Choose your weapon.

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    15,125
    Thanks Received:
    2,153
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Out here in the middle.
    Ratings:
    +2,155
    You obviously weren't watching (or paying attention) during Ames. Santorum is extremely hawkish towards Iran. The rest of the GOP field (save for Paul) is going to become much more hawkish on the issue as the election progresses.

    http://original.antiwar.com/anthony-gregory/2011/08/12/rick-santorum-targets-iran/

    Apparently Rick Santorum thinks we are already at war.

    You honestly think Iraq's failure to beat Iran in their war will have any bearing over our decision making process? Have you been sleeping for the last decade?

    I never thought the U.S. would be crazy enough to try and do a twofer while in Afghanistan. I am now cynical of what my government will do when it comes to wars of choice. It makes it so much easier to be militaristic with an all volunteer military.

    For the last point, it wouldn't matter. Even if we did obliterate Iran, the possibility of Iran nuking our staging area and inflicting tens if not hundreds of thousands of casualties makes the prospect so politically risky, no one would ever risk it.
     
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2011

Share This Page