Nobody is infringing on Ann Coulter's right to free speech

[MordechaiGoodbud]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

 

[Auld Phart]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

 

[deannalw]

None of you screamy yahoos can ever explain what any of these people have said that is racist, prejudiced, hateful or Nazi.
Y'all are always lying and you know it

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

.

You are certainly doing an excellent job hiding such from us, that's for sure.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

Everyone's right to free speech was "infringed on" when the university cowered and broke under threats of violence from the rioters. Without free speech, there is no democracy. If her ideas are so abhorrent and absurd, they can be defeated by arguments, but when the rioters resorted to threats of violence to keep her from speaking, they became the fascists they claim to oppose.

 

[Norman]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

^ This my friends, is how a complete moron sounds like.

Please move to North Korea and live your values there.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Everyone's right to free speech was "infringed on" when the university cowered and broke under threats of violence from the rioters. Without free speech, there is no democracy. If her ideas are so abhorrent and absurd, they can be defeated by arguments, but when the rioters resorted to threats of violence to keep her from speaking, they became the fascists they claim to oppose.

Can't you just imagine how this moron would respond if right wingers used intimidation and threats of violence to shut down Michael Moore or Noam Chomsky?

He'd be wetting himself in an uncontrollable rage.

For the lockstep leftist true believers, there ARE no principles. Just like the most fierce bible thumpers of the right, there is simply being with them or against them.

 

[2aguy]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

She isn't a neo-nazi...a nazi is a national socialist....she is an American Conservative so is, in fact, the exact opposite of a national socialist....but since you are a dumb ass, you wouldn't understand that....

 

[2aguy]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

What is it today....all the left wing dumb asses are posting ......after seeming to have consumed large quantities of drugs and alcohol...is it some sort of left wing asshole holiday or something?

 

[kyzr]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

What is it today....all the left wing dumb asses are posting ......after seeming to have consumed large quantities of drugs and alcohol...is it some sort of left wing asshole holiday or something?

Its apparently what they learn in college these days.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

So in your estimation faction A has the right to voice their opinions regarding the faction B's free speech, but faction B is not to be given reciprocal free speech voicing their opinions on faction A's? There's several names for that type of thinking.

 

[Auld Phart]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

So in your estimation faction A has the right to voice their opinions regarding the faction B's free speech, but faction B is not to be given reciprocal free speech voicing their opinions on faction A's? There's several names for that type of thinking.

Do you consider this infringement of free speech?



Why, or why not?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

She won't do that because no one's going to pay her $20,000 to do that, which was to be her payment to perform at Berkeley.

 

[2aguy]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

She won't do that because no one's going to pay her $20,000 to do that, which was to be her payment to perform at Berkeley.

That isn't very much...bill clinton, the rapist, got 500,000 dollars for speeches in Russia for putin, when hilary was Secretary of State.....

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

So in your estimation faction A has the right to voice their opinions regarding the faction B's free speech, but faction B is not to be given reciprocal free speech voicing their opinions on faction A's? There's several names for that type of thinking.

Do you consider this infringement of free speech?



Why, or why not?

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

You wrote that in response to this regarding Coulter;

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That had nothing to do with infringing speech, because Coulter didn't show up for her stunt and stab at further agitating to get more publicity. There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool! And it had nothing to do with BLM infringing on Sander's speech. Two different things altogether you are trying to meld together in your logical fallacy!

 

[2aguy]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

So in your estimation faction A has the right to voice their opinions regarding the faction B's free speech, but faction B is not to be given reciprocal free speech voicing their opinions on faction A's? There's several names for that type of thinking.

Do you consider this infringement of free speech?



Why, or why not?

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

You wrote that in response to this regarding Coulter;

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That had nothing to do with infringing speech, because Coulter didn't show up for her stunt and stab at further agitating to get more publicity. There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool! And it had nothing to do with BLM infringing on Sander's speech. Two different things altogether you are trying to meld together in your logical fallacy!

Please....stop drinking...stop doing drugs.......get help.........

 

[Moonglow]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

She won't do that because no one's going to pay her $20,000 to do that, which was to be her payment to perform at Berkeley.

That isn't very much...bill clinton, the rapist, got 500,000 dollars for speeches in Russia for putin, when hilary was Secretary of State.....

They value men as such in Russia...

 

[blackhawk]

 

[Auld Phart]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

So in your estimation faction A has the right to voice their opinions regarding the faction B's free speech, but faction B is not to be given reciprocal free speech voicing their opinions on faction A's? There's several names for that type of thinking.

Do you consider this infringement of free speech?



Why, or why not?

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

You wrote that in response to this regarding Coulter;

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That had nothing to do with infringing speech, because Coulter didn't show up for her stunt and stab at further agitating to get more publicity. There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool! And it had nothing to do with BLM infringing on Sander's speech. Two different things altogether you are trying to meld together in your logical fallacy!

There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool!

Tell me, thoughtless.

did the people that contracted her pull their offer because of the threats made about her speaking?

 

[Moonglow]

Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.

Amazon.com: Ann Coulter

Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.

If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.

However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

So in your estimation faction A has the right to voice their opinions regarding the faction B's free speech, but faction B is not to be given reciprocal free speech voicing their opinions on faction A's? There's several names for that type of thinking.

Do you consider this infringement of free speech?



Why, or why not?

That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.

You wrote that in response to this regarding Coulter;

because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.

That had nothing to do with infringing speech, because Coulter didn't show up for her stunt and stab at further agitating to get more publicity. There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool! And it had nothing to do with BLM infringing on Sander's speech. Two different things altogether you are trying to meld together in your logical fallacy!

There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool!

Tell me, thoughtless.

did the people that contracted her pull their offer because of the threats made about her speaking?

She has to have inflammatory speeches, since she got left behind on looks..