ReinyDays
Gold Member
No. Not even close to being within instrumentation error. These instruments are very, very good.Your graph very clearly shows 1,360 (± 5) W/m^2 ... your entire temperature plot is within instrumentation error ...
I know we have thermometers that are very accurate ... but the ones we have in wide distribution measure to the nearest whole degree ... and this is the NOAA standard for their thermometers ... ± 0.5ºC ... I know you're not familiar with meteorological data, but if you'd ever look you'd see that indeed all temperatures are recorded to the nearest whole degree ...
You are the only person I've ever encountered who says that TSI is perfectly constant. Nobody else on either side says such a thing. No science anywhere says such a thing. You are essentially alone in the universe with that claim.You're speaking nonsense ... the solar constant is called a constant for a very good reason ...
I understand you only listen to nonsense ... any solar scientist would agree with me ... solar output to three significant digits is 1,360 W/m^2 ... not 1,370 or 1,350 but 1,360 ...
Tell me how your average value can be more accurate than your original data ... and how would we know if we don't measure it ...