Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All those people are dead.What is the major malfunction here?
Julian Castro defends reparations push, says people who were state-sanctioned property deserve compensation
Come and repair my fence and I'll give you some shekels.Im a jew. Im owed reparations from almost every civilization on earth.
Im ok with reparations
All those people are dead.What is the major malfunction here?
Julian Castro defends reparations push, says people who were state-sanctioned property deserve compensation
Not everyone had riches passed down.There were also slaves all over the world at one time or another, it was acceptable and legal. It wasn't right, but that's what it was. Egyptians had slaves, are they held accountable? Same for all other countries.What about unjust enrichment, the proceeds of which have been passed down from generation to generation?
In contract law, unjust enrichment occurs when one person is enriched at the expense of another in circumstances that the law sees as unjust.[1] Where an individual is unjustly enriched, the law imposes an obligation upon the recipient to make restitution, subject to defences such as change of position. Liability for an unjust (or unjustified) enrichment arises irrespective of wrongdoing on the part of the recipient. The concept of unjust enrichment can be traced to Roman law and the maxim that "no one should be benefited at another's expense": nemo locupletari potest aliena iactura or nemo locupletari debet cum aliena iactura.
Unjust enrichment - Wikipedia
Lol sometimes i just think you are a trollWhat about unjust enrichment, the proceeds of which have been passed down from generation to generation?
In contract law, unjust enrichment occurs when one person is enriched at the expense of another in circumstances that the law sees as unjust.[1] Where an individual is unjustly enriched, the law imposes an obligation upon the recipient to make restitution, subject to defences such as change of position. Liability for an unjust (or unjustified) enrichment arises irrespective of wrongdoing on the part of the recipient. The concept of unjust enrichment can be traced to Roman law and the maxim that "no one should be benefited at another's expense": nemo locupletari potest aliena iactura or nemo locupletari debet cum aliena iactura.
Unjust enrichment - Wikipedia
Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premiseLol sometimes i just think you are a troll
Where does it say EVERYONE? And bringing up others who have committed human rights violations doesn't absolve the ones committed by those in the United States. Most people know "but Timmy did it too" is not a valid argument or excuse for their own wrong or in this case immoral and unlawful behavior by the time they're 5.Not everyone had riches passed down.There were also slaves all over the world at one time or another, it was acceptable and legal. It wasn't right, but that's what it was. Egyptians had slaves, are they held accountable? Same for all other countries.
Your argument lacks any thinking. To use that argument for reparations, that would include millions of other people.Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premiseLol sometimes i just think you are a troll
I didnt make excuses. I pointed out the reality, and it was not right and America and/or whites were not the only pepetratorsWhere does it say EVERYONE? And bringing up others who have committed human rights violations doesn't absolve the ones committed by those in the United States. Most people know "but Timmy did it too" is not a valid argument or excuse for their own wrong or in this case immoral and unlawful behavior by the time they're 5.Not everyone had riches passed down.There were also slaves all over the world at one time or another, it was acceptable and legal. It wasn't right, but that's what it was. Egyptians had slaves, are they held accountable? Same for all other countries.
The fact that it hasnt happened yet tells us everything we need to know about its "legal premise".Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premiseLol sometimes i just think you are a troll
Says the man (allegedly) who doesn't know the difference between a legal theory and an argument.Your argument lacks any thinking. To use that argument for reparations, that would include millions of other people.
Do you want to pay reparations to whites?
Your argument is a legal theory, genius.Says the man (allegedly) who doesn't know the difference between a legal theory and an argument.Your argument lacks any thinking. To use that argument for reparations, that would include millions of other people.
Do you want to pay reparations to whites?
We have done more than dispute it.Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premiseLol sometimes i just think you are a troll
Don't you know anything about Jews?
Someone brought a court case against the U.S. government for reparations for human rights violations against people of African descent and lost? What's the case number and send me a link to the decision(s).We have done more than dispute it.Why? I'm not the one who can't dispute the legal premiseLol sometimes i just think you are a troll
I haven't made an argument, that you don't know that is beyond pathetic.Your argument is a legal theory, genius.Says the man (allegedly) who doesn't know the difference between a legal theory and an argument.Your argument lacks any thinking. To use that argument for reparations, that would include millions of other people.
Do you want to pay reparations to whites?
Doesnt mean its settled.
